A comparison of core muscle endurance of females with fibromyalgia versus healthy females: An observational study

Q3 Health Professions
{"title":"A comparison of core muscle endurance of females with fibromyalgia versus healthy females: An observational study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rcreu.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Despite the numerous benefits of core muscle strengthening in improving symptoms of fibromyalgia (FM), limited studies have quantified core muscle function in FM patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the core muscle endurance of FM<span> females with age-matched healthy females and determine whether a correlation exists between core muscle endurance and FM severity.</span></div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div><span>Pre-diagnosed female FM patients (</span><em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->7) and age-matched healthy females (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->19) were assessed using McGill's core endurance tests in four positions – flexion, extension, and bilateral side-bridge. The longest contraction holding time (in seconds) in each position was noted and compared in both groups. Additionally, patient-reported Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) scores were obtained to determine disease severity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean holding time for trunk extensors (26.14<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.7<!--> <!-->s), right lateral flexors (20.14<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.3<!--> <!-->s), and left lateral flexors (20.86<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.3<!--> <!-->s) was significantly lower in the FM females than the healthy females (trunk extensors<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->55.21<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->17.1<!--> <!-->s; right lateral flexors<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->36.05<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->13.2<!--> <!-->s; left lateral flexors<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->35.11<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->13.8<!--> <!-->s). The endurance of trunk flexors was statistically similar in both groups (FM females<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->52.14<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->27.9<!--> <!-->s; healthy females<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->74.37<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->37.7<!--> <span>s). Lastly, core muscle endurance was not correlated with the FIQ scores in FM patients (</span><em>p</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of this preliminary study revealed that core extensor and lateral flexor endurance in FM females was lower than their healthy female counterparts. Larger sample studies are needed to further substantiate our findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37643,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0121812323000907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the numerous benefits of core muscle strengthening in improving symptoms of fibromyalgia (FM), limited studies have quantified core muscle function in FM patients.

Objective

To compare the core muscle endurance of FM females with age-matched healthy females and determine whether a correlation exists between core muscle endurance and FM severity.

Materials and methods

Pre-diagnosed female FM patients (n = 7) and age-matched healthy females (n = 19) were assessed using McGill's core endurance tests in four positions – flexion, extension, and bilateral side-bridge. The longest contraction holding time (in seconds) in each position was noted and compared in both groups. Additionally, patient-reported Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) scores were obtained to determine disease severity.

Results

The mean holding time for trunk extensors (26.14 ± 7.7 s), right lateral flexors (20.14 ± 8.3 s), and left lateral flexors (20.86 ± 5.3 s) was significantly lower in the FM females than the healthy females (trunk extensors = 55.21 ± 17.1 s; right lateral flexors = 36.05 ± 13.2 s; left lateral flexors = 35.11 ± 13.8 s). The endurance of trunk flexors was statistically similar in both groups (FM females = 52.14 ± 27.9 s; healthy females = 74.37 ± 37.7 s). Lastly, core muscle endurance was not correlated with the FIQ scores in FM patients (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The results of this preliminary study revealed that core extensor and lateral flexor endurance in FM females was lower than their healthy female counterparts. Larger sample studies are needed to further substantiate our findings.
纤维肌痛女性患者与健康女性核心肌耐力的比较:观察研究
引言尽管增强核心肌肉对改善纤维肌痛(FM)症状有诸多益处,但对 FM 患者核心肌肉功能进行量化的研究却很有限。目的比较 FM 女性与年龄匹配的健康女性的核心肌肉耐力,并确定核心肌肉耐力与 FM 严重程度之间是否存在相关性。材料和方法使用麦吉尔核心耐力测试,在屈曲、伸展和双侧桥式四种姿势下,对确诊的女性 FM 患者(7 人)和年龄匹配的健康女性(19 人)进行评估。记录每个体位的最长收缩保持时间(秒),并对两组进行比较。结果 躯干伸肌(26.14 ± 7.7 秒)、右侧屈肌(20.14 ± 8.3 秒)和左侧屈肌(20.86 ± 5.3 秒)的平均保持时间,FM 女性明显低于健康女性(躯干伸肌 = 55.21 ± 17.1 秒;右侧屈肌 = 36.05 ± 13.2 秒;左侧屈肌 = 35.11 ± 13.8 秒)。两组的躯干屈肌耐力在统计上相似(FM 女性 = 52.14 ± 27.9 秒;健康女性 = 74.37 ± 37.7 秒)。最后,核心肌耐力与 FM 患者的 FIQ 分数不相关(p > 0.05)。要进一步证实我们的研究结果,还需要进行更大规模的样本研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Reumatologia
Revista Colombiana de Reumatologia Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: The Colombian Journal of Rheumatology (Revista Colombiana de Reumatología) is the official organ of the Colombian Association of Rheumatology (Asociación Colombiana de Reumatología) and the Central American, Caribbean and Andean Association of Rheumatology (Asociación Centroamericana Caribe Andina de Reumatología) - ACCA. It was created in December 1993 with the purpose of disseminating scientific information derived from primary and secondary research and presenting cases coming from the practice of Rheumatology in Latin America. Since its foundation, the Journal has been characterized by its plurality with subjects of all rheumatic and osteomuscular pathologies, in the form of original articles, historical articles, economic evaluations, and articles of reflection and education in Medicine. It covers an extensive area of topics ranging from the broad spectrum of the clinical aspects of rheumatology and related areas in autoimmunity (both in pediatric and adult pathologies), to aspects of basic sciences. It is an academic tool for the different members of the academic and scientific community at their different levels of training, from undergraduate to post-doctoral degrees, managing to integrate all actors inter and trans disciplinarily. It is intended for rheumatologists, general internists, specialists in related areas, and general practitioners in the country and abroad. It has become an important space in the work of all rheumatologists from Central and South America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信