Are We Truly Different in Personal Values and Compulsive Buying Proclivity? Cross-Cultural Contrasts Between the United States and East-Central Europe

IF 8.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Piotr Tarka, Richard J. Harnish, Jasurbek Babaev
{"title":"Are We Truly Different in Personal Values and Compulsive Buying Proclivity? Cross-Cultural Contrasts Between the United States and East-Central Europe","authors":"Piotr Tarka,&nbsp;Richard J. Harnish,&nbsp;Jasurbek Babaev","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.13094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The current study explores the intersection of personal values theory, consumer culture, and compulsive buying behavior theories. By examining the importance of different values types, we aim to understand the extent to which specific values influence individuals' tendency to either embrace or resist maladaptive behaviors like compulsive buying. This study postulated that one's values can both contribute to the development of compulsive buying tendencies and act as a protective factor. Importantly, we explored this values-compulsive relationship within the contrasting consumer cultures of the United States characterized by individualism, and Poland, which predominantly exhibits collectivistic trends. In this work, we utilized two distinct samples/studies of American (<i>n</i> = 367) and Polish (<i>n</i> = 370) consumers and employed two key measurement tools: the Portrait Values Questionnaire and the Richmond Compulsive Buying Scale. The research findings revealed that values such as self-direction, stimulation, hedonism, power, and achievement tend to promote compulsive buying tendencies irrespective of the cultural context. However, the prevalence of compulsive buying is more pronounced among American consumers compared to their Polish counterparts. Furthermore, the impact of hedonism and achievement on compulsive buying was twice as large in the United States as it was in Poland. On the other hand, values such as tradition, security, conformity, benevolence, and universalism appeared to help individuals in preventing or mitigating compulsive buying behavior. This study underscores the critical role of personal values, cultural variations, and their impact on compulsive buying tendencies among consumers. It highlights the presence of specific personal values that can either inhibit or facilitate the development of compulsive buying behaviors.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"48 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.13094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study explores the intersection of personal values theory, consumer culture, and compulsive buying behavior theories. By examining the importance of different values types, we aim to understand the extent to which specific values influence individuals' tendency to either embrace or resist maladaptive behaviors like compulsive buying. This study postulated that one's values can both contribute to the development of compulsive buying tendencies and act as a protective factor. Importantly, we explored this values-compulsive relationship within the contrasting consumer cultures of the United States characterized by individualism, and Poland, which predominantly exhibits collectivistic trends. In this work, we utilized two distinct samples/studies of American (n = 367) and Polish (n = 370) consumers and employed two key measurement tools: the Portrait Values Questionnaire and the Richmond Compulsive Buying Scale. The research findings revealed that values such as self-direction, stimulation, hedonism, power, and achievement tend to promote compulsive buying tendencies irrespective of the cultural context. However, the prevalence of compulsive buying is more pronounced among American consumers compared to their Polish counterparts. Furthermore, the impact of hedonism and achievement on compulsive buying was twice as large in the United States as it was in Poland. On the other hand, values such as tradition, security, conformity, benevolence, and universalism appeared to help individuals in preventing or mitigating compulsive buying behavior. This study underscores the critical role of personal values, cultural variations, and their impact on compulsive buying tendencies among consumers. It highlights the presence of specific personal values that can either inhibit or facilitate the development of compulsive buying behaviors.

我们的个人价值观和强迫性购买倾向真的不同吗?美国与中东欧的跨文化对比
本研究探讨了个人价值观理论、消费文化和强迫性购买行为理论的交叉点。通过研究不同价值观类型的重要性,我们旨在了解特定价值观在多大程度上影响个人接受或抵制强迫性购买等不良行为的倾向。本研究推测,一个人的价值观既可能导致强迫性购买倾向的形成,也可能成为一种保护因素。重要的是,我们在以个人主义为特征的美国和以集体主义趋势为主的波兰这两种截然不同的消费文化中探讨了价值观与强迫症之间的关系。在这项工作中,我们利用了美国(367 人)和波兰(370 人)两个不同的消费者样本/研究,并使用了两个关键的测量工具:肖像价值观问卷和里士满强迫性购买量表。研究结果表明,无论文化背景如何,自我导向、刺激、享乐主义、权力和成就等价值观往往会促进强迫性购买倾向。然而,与波兰消费者相比,美国消费者的强迫性购买倾向更为明显。此外,享乐主义和成就感对强迫性购买的影响在美国是波兰的两倍。另一方面,传统、安全、顺从、仁慈和普遍主义等价值观似乎有助于个人预防或减轻强迫性购买行为。这项研究强调了个人价值观的关键作用、文化差异及其对消费者强迫性购买倾向的影响。它强调了特定个人价值观的存在,这些价值观可以抑制或促进强迫性购买行为的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信