Assessing the monetary value of active transport and e-micromobility: A systematic review

IF 3.9 Q2 TRANSPORTATION

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.trip.2024.101243

Lauren Del Rosario , Hao Wu , Jinwoo (Brian) Lee , Lee Roberts , Tony Arnold , Sandeep Mathur , Christopher Pettit

{"title":"Assessing the monetary value of active transport and e-micromobility: A systematic review","authors":"Lauren Del Rosario , Hao Wu , Jinwoo (Brian) Lee , Lee Roberts , Tony Arnold , Sandeep Mathur , Christopher Pettit","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Costs/benefits research to support active transport/electric micromobility investments are needed for optimal investment of public funds. This systematic review provides an evidence base of the economic effects of active transport and electric micromobility modes. Previous reviews including non-health benefits of active transport have been limited to Europe. Twenty-three studies from both the academic and grey literature were included in the review. Values for walking ranged from USD −0.25 ∼ 4.25/km, values for cycling ranged from USD −1.00 ∼ 1.95/km, and values for e-bike and e-scooter ranged from USD −0.44 ∼ 1.15/km. The largest benefit for active transport was due to health parameters. There were large variations in monetised benefits; some studies incorporated only certain types of benefits. Research gaps included inconsistent evidence for assumptions and a lack of data especially for electric micromobility modes. The quality of grey literature also varied.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101243"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259019822400229X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Costs/benefits research to support active transport/electric micromobility investments are needed for optimal investment of public funds. This systematic review provides an evidence base of the economic effects of active transport and electric micromobility modes. Previous reviews including non-health benefits of active transport have been limited to Europe. Twenty-three studies from both the academic and grey literature were included in the review. Values for walking ranged from USD −0.25 ∼ 4.25/km, values for cycling ranged from USD −1.00 ∼ 1.95/km, and values for e-bike and e-scooter ranged from USD −0.44 ∼ 1.15/km. The largest benefit for active transport was due to health parameters. There were large variations in monetised benefits; some studies incorporated only certain types of benefits. Research gaps included inconsistent evidence for assumptions and a lack of data especially for electric micromobility modes. The quality of grey literature also varied.

查看原文本刊更多论文

评估主动交通和电动交通的货币价值：系统回顾

为了优化公共资金的投资，需要对支持主动交通/电动微型交通投资的成本/效益进行研究。本系统性综述为主动交通和电动微型交通模式的经济效应提供了证据基础。以往包括主动交通的非健康效益的综述仅限于欧洲。本综述包括 23 项学术研究和灰色文献。步行的效益值为-0.25 美元 ∼ 4.25 美元/公里，骑自行车的效益值为-1.00 美元 ∼ 1.95 美元/公里，电动自行车和电动摩托车的效益值为-0.44 美元 ∼ 1.15 美元/公里。积极交通的最大收益来自健康参数。货币化效益存在很大差异；一些研究仅纳入了某些类型的效益。研究差距包括假设的证据不一致，以及缺乏数据，尤其是电动微型交通模式的数据。灰色文献的质量也参差不齐。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊