Definition of direct and indirect types of landslide-bridge interference and a checklist for identifying and characterizing potential landslides

Nicola Perilli , Massimiliano Lombardi , Nicola Nenci , Nunziante Squeglia , Stefano Stacul
{"title":"Definition of direct and indirect types of landslide-bridge interference and a checklist for identifying and characterizing potential landslides","authors":"Nicola Perilli ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Lombardi ,&nbsp;Nicola Nenci ,&nbsp;Nunziante Squeglia ,&nbsp;Stefano Stacul","doi":"10.1016/j.prostr.2024.09.077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>According to the new Italian Guidelines on existing bridges (LLG) the evaluation of the landslide susceptibility, vulnerability, and exposure, is based on the collection of the data necessary to fill the Field Sheet Form during the Periodic Field Surveys. Based on the knowledge and expertise gained during the inspections of the surrounding areas of a relevant number of existing bridges located in different geomorphological and geological contexts (i.e., Northern and Southern Apennines of Italy), the Authors recognized several difficulties in the accurate evaluation of the parameters to assess susceptibility and vulnerability according to LLG. In particular, the evaluation of the secondary parameters, namely <em>extent of the interference</em> and <em>overall reliability of the assessment</em>, depends greatly on the arbitrariness of the inspector. The main objectives of this work are: (a) to provide useful elements to distinguish between two types of landslide-bridge interference (direct and indirect) and evaluate the <em>extent of the interference</em> parameter (available options are: <em>Total, Partial</em>, and <em>Approach Zone</em>); (b) to propose an Additional Field Sheet Form aimed to improve the identification and characterization of Potential Landslides and to make more objective the self-evaluation of the inspector about the <em>overall reliability of the assessment</em> (two options: <em>good, limited</em>) of the primary parameters characterizing the landslide (<em>activity, velocity</em>, and <em>magnitude</em>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20518,"journal":{"name":"Procedia Structural Integrity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia Structural Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452321624006620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the new Italian Guidelines on existing bridges (LLG) the evaluation of the landslide susceptibility, vulnerability, and exposure, is based on the collection of the data necessary to fill the Field Sheet Form during the Periodic Field Surveys. Based on the knowledge and expertise gained during the inspections of the surrounding areas of a relevant number of existing bridges located in different geomorphological and geological contexts (i.e., Northern and Southern Apennines of Italy), the Authors recognized several difficulties in the accurate evaluation of the parameters to assess susceptibility and vulnerability according to LLG. In particular, the evaluation of the secondary parameters, namely extent of the interference and overall reliability of the assessment, depends greatly on the arbitrariness of the inspector. The main objectives of this work are: (a) to provide useful elements to distinguish between two types of landslide-bridge interference (direct and indirect) and evaluate the extent of the interference parameter (available options are: Total, Partial, and Approach Zone); (b) to propose an Additional Field Sheet Form aimed to improve the identification and characterization of Potential Landslides and to make more objective the self-evaluation of the inspector about the overall reliability of the assessment (two options: good, limited) of the primary parameters characterizing the landslide (activity, velocity, and magnitude).
山体滑坡桥梁直接和间接干扰类型的定义,以及识别和描述潜在山体滑坡的清单
根据意大利关于现有桥梁的新指南 (LLG),对滑坡易发性、易损性和暴露程度的评估是基于在定期实地勘察期间收集必要的数据来填写现场表格。根据对位于不同地貌和地质环境(即意大利亚平宁半岛北部和南部)的大量现有桥梁周边地区进行检查时获得的知识和专业技能,作者认识到在根据 LLG 评估易滑性和易损性的参数的准确评估方面存在一些困难。尤其是次要参数的评估,即干扰程度和评估的整体可靠性,在很大程度上取决于检查员的随意性。这项工作的主要目标是(a) 提供有用的元素,以区分两种类型的滑坡桥梁干扰(直接干扰和间接干扰),并评估干扰参数的范围(可用选项包括:全部、部分和接近区);(b) 提出附加现场表单,旨在改进潜在滑坡的识别和特征描述,并使检查员对滑坡主要特征参数(活动、速度和规模)的整体可靠性评估(两个选项:良好、有限)的自我评价更加客观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信