Retain, reactivate or acquire: Can nonprofits reliably use community profiles as an alternative to past donation data?

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Shameek Sinha , Sumit Malik , Vijay Mahajan , Frenkel ter Hofstede
{"title":"Retain, reactivate or acquire: Can nonprofits reliably use community profiles as an alternative to past donation data?","authors":"Shameek Sinha ,&nbsp;Sumit Malik ,&nbsp;Vijay Mahajan ,&nbsp;Frenkel ter Hofstede","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nonprofits face the challenge of low response rates to solicitations, leading to unachieved fundraising goals. They face difficulty in retaining active donors, reactivating lapsed donors, and acquiring prospective donors. The challenge often stems from the need for more reliable data for predicting the expected behavior of different groups of donors. Although nonprofits have reliable data relating to past donations from active donors, the data on lapsed donors is limited, and data on prospective donors is nonexistent. We propose that nonprofits can use community-clustered donor profiles to predict the expected donations. Our results validate that predictions based on “actual donation data” and “community donor profiles” are equivalent in accuracy. Drawing insights from the nonprofit marketing and social psychology literature, we suggest that nonprofits can reliably devise targeting strategies for active, lapsed, and prospective donors using community-clustered profiles. We test these predictions using a donation incidence model and conduct several robustness checks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 114997"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324005010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonprofits face the challenge of low response rates to solicitations, leading to unachieved fundraising goals. They face difficulty in retaining active donors, reactivating lapsed donors, and acquiring prospective donors. The challenge often stems from the need for more reliable data for predicting the expected behavior of different groups of donors. Although nonprofits have reliable data relating to past donations from active donors, the data on lapsed donors is limited, and data on prospective donors is nonexistent. We propose that nonprofits can use community-clustered donor profiles to predict the expected donations. Our results validate that predictions based on “actual donation data” and “community donor profiles” are equivalent in accuracy. Drawing insights from the nonprofit marketing and social psychology literature, we suggest that nonprofits can reliably devise targeting strategies for active, lapsed, and prospective donors using community-clustered profiles. We test these predictions using a donation incidence model and conduct several robustness checks.
保留、重新激活或收购:非营利组织能否可靠地使用社区概况来替代过去的捐赠数据?
非营利组织面临着募捐响应率低的挑战,导致筹款目标无法实现。他们在留住活跃捐赠者、重新激活已流失的捐赠者以及获得潜在捐赠者方面面临困难。这一挑战往往源于需要更可靠的数据来预测不同捐赠者群体的预期行为。尽管非营利组织拥有关于活跃捐赠者过去捐赠情况的可靠数据,但关于失效捐赠者的数据却很有限,而关于潜在捐赠者的数据更是不存在。我们建议非营利组织使用社区聚类的捐赠者资料来预测预期捐赠。我们的研究结果证明,基于 "实际捐赠数据 "和 "社区捐赠者资料 "的预测准确性相当。我们从非营利组织的市场营销和社会心理学文献中汲取灵感,认为非营利组织可以利用社区聚类特征为活跃捐赠者、过期捐赠者和潜在捐赠者制定可靠的目标策略。我们使用捐赠发生率模型检验了这些预测,并进行了若干稳健性检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信