How is leaf herbivory related to agriculture? Insights from the Mexican center of crop origin

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Jorge Ruiz-Arocho, Raúl González-Salas, Gabriel LeMay, Nicholas Steinthal, Alicia Mastretta-Yanes, Ana Wegier, Ofelia Vargas-Ponce, Lislie Solís-Montero, Quetzalcóatl Orozco-Ramírez, Yolanda H. Chen
{"title":"How is leaf herbivory related to agriculture? Insights from the Mexican center of crop origin","authors":"Jorge Ruiz-Arocho,&nbsp;Raúl González-Salas,&nbsp;Gabriel LeMay,&nbsp;Nicholas Steinthal,&nbsp;Alicia Mastretta-Yanes,&nbsp;Ana Wegier,&nbsp;Ofelia Vargas-Ponce,&nbsp;Lislie Solís-Montero,&nbsp;Quetzalcóatl Orozco-Ramírez,&nbsp;Yolanda H. Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11829-023-10019-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although insect herbivory is thought to be higher in agroecosystems compared to natural ecosystems, direct evidence on how agriculture itself has impacted herbivory remains scarce. To understand the effects of agriculture, or the cultivation of domesticated crops, over higher trophic levels, it is necessary to compare cultivated crops and their wild counterparts in centers of origin. In such regions, insect herbivores have a shared history of interacting with wild host plants prior to crop domestication and cultivation. However, most studies evaluating the impacts of agriculture on herbivory have been conducted in geographic regions where crops have been introduced. Here, we studied how insect herbivory is related to agriculture in Mexico, which is part of the Mesoamerican center of origin. We focused on patterns of leaf herbivory across four Mexican crops (squash, beans, maize, and husk tomatoes). We tested if total leaf herbivory, as well as the composition and dominance of different types of damage caused by leaf-feeding insects, differed between domesticated crops and their wild counterparts. Overall, we found that the relationship between agriculture and leaf herbivory depends on the observed crop. Compared to their wild ancestors (or wild relatives), leaf herbivory was higher in squash and maize, lower in husk tomatoes, and similar in beans. We also found that, due to differences in damaged area and/or shifts in dominance, damage compositions varied in squash, maize, and husk tomatoes. Therefore, our findings reinforce the idea that crop resistance against herbivory varies depending on the plant species and herbivore under study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8409,"journal":{"name":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","volume":"18 1","pages":"89 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-023-10019-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although insect herbivory is thought to be higher in agroecosystems compared to natural ecosystems, direct evidence on how agriculture itself has impacted herbivory remains scarce. To understand the effects of agriculture, or the cultivation of domesticated crops, over higher trophic levels, it is necessary to compare cultivated crops and their wild counterparts in centers of origin. In such regions, insect herbivores have a shared history of interacting with wild host plants prior to crop domestication and cultivation. However, most studies evaluating the impacts of agriculture on herbivory have been conducted in geographic regions where crops have been introduced. Here, we studied how insect herbivory is related to agriculture in Mexico, which is part of the Mesoamerican center of origin. We focused on patterns of leaf herbivory across four Mexican crops (squash, beans, maize, and husk tomatoes). We tested if total leaf herbivory, as well as the composition and dominance of different types of damage caused by leaf-feeding insects, differed between domesticated crops and their wild counterparts. Overall, we found that the relationship between agriculture and leaf herbivory depends on the observed crop. Compared to their wild ancestors (or wild relatives), leaf herbivory was higher in squash and maize, lower in husk tomatoes, and similar in beans. We also found that, due to differences in damaged area and/or shifts in dominance, damage compositions varied in squash, maize, and husk tomatoes. Therefore, our findings reinforce the idea that crop resistance against herbivory varies depending on the plant species and herbivore under study.

叶食草动物与农业有何关系?来自墨西哥作物起源中心的启示
尽管人们认为农业生态系统中的昆虫食草量高于自然生态系统,但有关农业本身如何影响食草量的直接证据仍然很少。要了解农业或驯化作物的种植对较高营养级的影响,有必要对原产地中心的驯化作物及其野生同类作物进行比较。在这些地区,昆虫食草动物在作物驯化和栽培之前与野生寄主植物有着共同的互动历史。然而,大多数评估农业对食草动物影响的研究都是在引入作物的地区进行的。在这里,我们研究了昆虫食草与墨西哥农业的关系,墨西哥是中美洲起源中心的一部分。我们重点研究了墨西哥四种作物(南瓜、豆类、玉米和带壳番茄)的叶片食草模式。我们测试了驯化作物和野生作物的叶片草食总量以及食叶昆虫造成的不同类型损害的构成和主导地位是否存在差异。总体而言,我们发现农业与叶片草食性之间的关系取决于所观察的作物。与它们的野生祖先(或野生近缘种)相比,南瓜和玉米的叶片食草量较高,番茄的叶片食草量较低,而豆类的叶片食草量则类似。我们还发现,由于被害面积的不同和/或优势地位的转移,南瓜、玉米和番茄壳的被害成分也各不相同。因此,我们的研究结果强化了这样一种观点,即作物对食草动物的抗性因研究的植物种类和食草动物而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Arthropod-Plant Interactions 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Arthropod-Plant Interactions is dedicated to publishing high quality original papers and reviews with a broad fundamental or applied focus on ecological, biological, and evolutionary aspects of the interactions between insects and other arthropods with plants. Coverage extends to all aspects of such interactions including chemical, biochemical, genetic, and molecular analysis, as well reporting on multitrophic studies, ecophysiology, and mutualism. Arthropod-Plant Interactions encourages the submission of forum papers that challenge prevailing hypotheses. The journal encourages a diversity of opinion by presenting both invited and unsolicited review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信