Verification and validation of a numerical wave tank with momentum source wave generation

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Housheng Zhang  (, ), Yijing Hu  (, ), Biao Huang  (, ), Xin Zhao  (, )
{"title":"Verification and validation of a numerical wave tank with momentum source wave generation","authors":"Housheng Zhang \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Yijing Hu \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Biao Huang \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Xin Zhao \n (,&nbsp;)","doi":"10.1007/s10409-024-24127-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A systematic verification and validation (V&amp;V) of our previously proposed momentum source wave generation method is performed. Some settings of previous numerical wave tanks (NWTs) of regular and irregular waves have been optimized. The H2-5 V&amp;V method involving five mesh sizes with mesh refinement ratio being 1.225 is used to verify the NWT of regular waves, in which the wave height and mass conservation are mainly considered based on a Lv3 (<i>H</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.75 m) and a Lv6 (<i>H</i><sub>s</sub> = 5 m) regular wave. Additionally, eight different sea states are chosen to validate the wave height, mass conservation and wave frequency of regular waves. Regarding the NWT of irregular waves, five different sea states with significant wave heights ranging from 0.09 m to 12.5 m are selected to validate the statistical characteristics of irregular waves, including the profile of the wave spectrum, peak frequency and significant wave height. Results show that the verification errors for Lv3 and Lv6 regular wave on the most refined grid are −0.018 and −0.35 for wave height, respectively, and −0.14 and for −0.17 mass conservation, respectively. The uncertainty estimation analysis shows that the numerical error could be partially balanced out by the modelling error to achieve a smaller validation error by adjusting the mesh size elaborately. And the validation errors of the wave height, mass conservation and dominant frequency of regular waves under different sea states are no more than 7%, 8% and 2%, respectively. For a Lv3 (<i>H</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.75 m) and a Lv6 (<i>H</i><sub>s</sub> = 5 m) regular wave, simulations are validated on the wave height in wave development section for safety factors <i>FS</i> ≈ 1 and <i>FS</i> ≈ 0.5–1, respectively. Regarding irregular waves, the validation errors of the significant wave height and peak frequency are both lower than 2%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7109,"journal":{"name":"Acta Mechanica Sinica","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Mechanica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10409-024-24127-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A systematic verification and validation (V&V) of our previously proposed momentum source wave generation method is performed. Some settings of previous numerical wave tanks (NWTs) of regular and irregular waves have been optimized. The H2-5 V&V method involving five mesh sizes with mesh refinement ratio being 1.225 is used to verify the NWT of regular waves, in which the wave height and mass conservation are mainly considered based on a Lv3 (Hs = 0.75 m) and a Lv6 (Hs = 5 m) regular wave. Additionally, eight different sea states are chosen to validate the wave height, mass conservation and wave frequency of regular waves. Regarding the NWT of irregular waves, five different sea states with significant wave heights ranging from 0.09 m to 12.5 m are selected to validate the statistical characteristics of irregular waves, including the profile of the wave spectrum, peak frequency and significant wave height. Results show that the verification errors for Lv3 and Lv6 regular wave on the most refined grid are −0.018 and −0.35 for wave height, respectively, and −0.14 and for −0.17 mass conservation, respectively. The uncertainty estimation analysis shows that the numerical error could be partially balanced out by the modelling error to achieve a smaller validation error by adjusting the mesh size elaborately. And the validation errors of the wave height, mass conservation and dominant frequency of regular waves under different sea states are no more than 7%, 8% and 2%, respectively. For a Lv3 (Hs = 0.75 m) and a Lv6 (Hs = 5 m) regular wave, simulations are validated on the wave height in wave development section for safety factors FS ≈ 1 and FS ≈ 0.5–1, respectively. Regarding irregular waves, the validation errors of the significant wave height and peak frequency are both lower than 2%.

动量源波浪生成数值波浪槽的验证与确认
对我们之前提出的动量源波生成方法进行了系统的验证和确认(V&V)。对之前的规则波和不规则波数值波箱(NWT)的一些设置进行了优化。使用 H2-5 V&V 方法(涉及五种网格尺寸,网格细化率为 1.225)验证了规则波的 NWT,其中主要考虑了基于 Lv3 (Hs = 0.75 m) 和 Lv6 (Hs = 5 m) 规则波的波高和质量守恒。此外,还选择了八种不同的海况来验证规则波的波高、质量守恒和波频。关于不规则波的西北太平洋试验,选择了五个不同的海况,其显著波高从 0.09 米到 12.5 米不等,以验证不规则波的统计特征,包括波谱剖面、峰值频率和显著波高。结果表明,在最精细网格上,Lv3 和 Lv6 不规则波的波高验证误差分别为-0.018 和-0.35,质量保证误差分别为-0.14 和-0.17。不确定性估计分析表明,通过精细调整网格尺寸,数值误差可以被建模误差部分抵消,从而获得较小的验证误差。而不同海况下的波高、质量守恒和规则波主导频率的验证误差分别不超过 7%、8% 和 2%。对于 Lv3(Hs = 0.75 米)和 Lv6(Hs = 5 米)规则波,分别在安全系数 FS ≈ 1 和 FS ≈ 0.5-1 时对波浪发展段的波高进行了模拟验证。对于不规则波,显著波高和峰值频率的验证误差均小于 2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Mechanica Sinica
Acta Mechanica Sinica 物理-工程:机械
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
1807
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Mechanica Sinica, sponsored by the Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, promotes scientific exchanges and collaboration among Chinese scientists in China and abroad. It features high quality, original papers in all aspects of mechanics and mechanical sciences. Not only does the journal explore the classical subdivisions of theoretical and applied mechanics such as solid and fluid mechanics, it also explores recently emerging areas such as biomechanics and nanomechanics. In addition, the journal investigates analytical, computational, and experimental progresses in all areas of mechanics. Lastly, it encourages research in interdisciplinary subjects, serving as a bridge between mechanics and other branches of engineering and the sciences. In addition to research papers, Acta Mechanica Sinica publishes reviews, notes, experimental techniques, scientific events, and other special topics of interest. Related subjects » Classical Continuum Physics - Computational Intelligence and Complexity - Mechanics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信