The Influence of Preablation Embolization Particle Size on the Size of the Microwave Ablation Zone in a Porcine Orthotopic Renal Tumor Model.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Samuel L Rice, Sagine Berry-Tony, Jamaal Benjamin, Payal Kapur, Wisam Alnablsi, Daniel Lamus, Regina Beets-Tan, Anil Pillai
{"title":"The Influence of Preablation Embolization Particle Size on the Size of the Microwave Ablation Zone in a Porcine Orthotopic Renal Tumor Model.","authors":"Samuel L Rice, Sagine Berry-Tony, Jamaal Benjamin, Payal Kapur, Wisam Alnablsi, Daniel Lamus, Regina Beets-Tan, Anil Pillai","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2024.09.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the effect of arterial embolization using different embolic agents and sizes on microwave ablation (MWA) zone size in a porcine renal tumor (RT) model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a transgenic porcine kidney, 32 sites were inoculated, with 28 orthotopic RTs induced. Experimental groups (23 tumors) underwent angiography with arterial embolization using various embolic materials (calibrated particles from 40 to 1,200 μm, and ethiodized oil) to achieve vascular stasis of the RT. MWA using a standard protocol (3 minutes at 65 W) was subsequently performed for all tumors. Gross and histologic ex vivo analyses of the ablation zones were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Control group ablation zone volume without prior embolization was 5.24 cm<sup>3</sup> (SD ± 0.55). Ablation zones after embolization with 40 μm, 100 μm, 300-500 μm, 900-1,200 μm particles were significantly larger than those with MWA alone (mean, 15.39 cm<sup>3</sup> [SD ± 4.54]; P = .002; 11.07 cm<sup>3</sup> [SD ± 1.39]; P = .001; 8.68 cm<sup>3</sup> [SD ± 0.77]; P = .001; and 9.90 cm<sup>3</sup> [SD ± 1.62]; P = .002, respectively). Liquid embolic ethiodized oil emulsion did not create a significant increase in the ablation zone (5.92 cm<sup>3</sup> [SD ± 1.43 cm<sup>3</sup>]; P = .492).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pre-MWA arterial embolization in a porcine RT model produced a statistically significant increase in the ablation zone when compared with MWA alone. Using smaller particle size embolic material with distal embolization at the tumor arterioles (50-150 μm) produced the largest, almost 3-fold increase in ablation zone volume.</p>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2024.09.027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effect of arterial embolization using different embolic agents and sizes on microwave ablation (MWA) zone size in a porcine renal tumor (RT) model.

Materials and methods: In a transgenic porcine kidney, 32 sites were inoculated, with 28 orthotopic RTs induced. Experimental groups (23 tumors) underwent angiography with arterial embolization using various embolic materials (calibrated particles from 40 to 1,200 μm, and ethiodized oil) to achieve vascular stasis of the RT. MWA using a standard protocol (3 minutes at 65 W) was subsequently performed for all tumors. Gross and histologic ex vivo analyses of the ablation zones were performed.

Results: Control group ablation zone volume without prior embolization was 5.24 cm3 (SD ± 0.55). Ablation zones after embolization with 40 μm, 100 μm, 300-500 μm, 900-1,200 μm particles were significantly larger than those with MWA alone (mean, 15.39 cm3 [SD ± 4.54]; P = .002; 11.07 cm3 [SD ± 1.39]; P = .001; 8.68 cm3 [SD ± 0.77]; P = .001; and 9.90 cm3 [SD ± 1.62]; P = .002, respectively). Liquid embolic ethiodized oil emulsion did not create a significant increase in the ablation zone (5.92 cm3 [SD ± 1.43 cm3]; P = .492).

Conclusions: Pre-MWA arterial embolization in a porcine RT model produced a statistically significant increase in the ablation zone when compared with MWA alone. Using smaller particle size embolic material with distal embolization at the tumor arterioles (50-150 μm) produced the largest, almost 3-fold increase in ablation zone volume.

猪原位肾肿瘤模型中消融前栓塞粒子大小对微波消融区大小的影响
目的:在猪肾肿瘤(RT)中结合使用不同的栓塞剂进行动脉栓塞,然后进行微波消融(MWA),以评估消融区(AZ)大小变化最大的理想设置:在转基因猪肾脏的 32 个部位接种 28 个正位 RT。实验组(23 个肿瘤)接受了血管造影术,利用各种栓塞材料(40 至 1200 μm 的校准颗粒和乙碘化油)进行动脉内栓塞,以完成 RT 的血管瘀滞。随后,采用标准方案(3 分钟,65 瓦)对所有肿瘤进行 MWA。随后,对 AZ 进行了大体和组织学活体分析:结果:未经栓塞的对照组 AZ 体积为 5.24 cm3 ± 0.55 cm3。使用 40 μm、100 μm、300-500 μm、900-1200 μm 粒子栓塞后的 AZ 明显比单独使用 MWA 大(平均值 ± 标准偏差:15.39 cm3 ± 4.00 cm3):分别为 15.39 cm3 ± 4.54,p=0.002;11.07 cm3 ± 1.39 cm3,p=0.001;8.68 cm3 ± 0.77 cm3,p=0.001;900-1200 μm:9.90 cm3 ± 1.62 cm3,p=0.002)。液体栓塞、乙碘化油乳剂并未使 AZ 显著增加(5.92 立方厘米 ± 1.43 立方厘米,P=0.492):结论:在猪RT模型中进行MWA前动脉栓塞与单独进行MWA相比,AZ的增加具有统计学意义。使用粒径较小的栓塞材料并在肿瘤动脉远端栓塞(50-150 μm)所产生的AZ体积最大,几乎增加了3倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
942
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信