Meta analysis of 2059 patients assessing early discharge after DIEP flap breast reconstruction: Comprehensive outcomes before post-operative day 5

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Puja Jagasia, Ricardo A. Torres-Guzman, Eliana Dash, Matthew Sigel, Andrew James, Elizabeth D. Slater, Megan Vucovich, Carrie Kubiak, Stephane Braun, Galen Perdikis, Lauren Connor
{"title":"Meta analysis of 2059 patients assessing early discharge after DIEP flap breast reconstruction: Comprehensive outcomes before post-operative day 5","authors":"Puja Jagasia,&nbsp;Ricardo A. Torres-Guzman,&nbsp;Eliana Dash,&nbsp;Matthew Sigel,&nbsp;Andrew James,&nbsp;Elizabeth D. Slater,&nbsp;Megan Vucovich,&nbsp;Carrie Kubiak,&nbsp;Stephane Braun,&nbsp;Galen Perdikis,&nbsp;Lauren Connor","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Autologous reconstruction with DIEP flap has illustrated greater patient satisfaction with both aesthetic satisfaction and reconstructive treatment process when compared to implant-based reconstruction longitudinally. However, DIEP flap breast reconstruction is associated with longer in-patient hospitalizations to monitor flap status. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to report outcomes regarding the use of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, particularly looking at the impact on complication rates in patients who undergo DIEP flap procedures and are discharged within 5 days after surgery. A computerized search was conducted on September 29th, 2023 using the MeSH terms “Free Tissue Flaps” OR “Myocutaneous Flap” OR “Surgical Flaps” AND “Patient Discharge”. Twenty-four papers reporting on 2059 patients were included in the study, and four study groups were created by length of stay as follows: LOS 1–1.99 days = Group 1, LOS 2–2.99 days = Group 2, LOS 3–3.99 = Group 3, and LOS 4–5 days = Group 4 (control). An independent samples t-test was performed to compare the mean rates of each complication between Groups 1 and 4, Groups 2 and 4, and Groups 3 and 4. This meta-analysis showed no significant differences between rates of hematoma, seroma, infection and reoperation between groups. There was a significantly lower rate of total flap loss in all 3 groups with LOS less than 4 days when compared to the group with LOS between 4 and 5 days. This meta-analysis shows that appropriate patients may be discharged safely as early as POD1 following DIEP flap.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"99 ","pages":"Pages 230-237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524006326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autologous reconstruction with DIEP flap has illustrated greater patient satisfaction with both aesthetic satisfaction and reconstructive treatment process when compared to implant-based reconstruction longitudinally. However, DIEP flap breast reconstruction is associated with longer in-patient hospitalizations to monitor flap status. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to report outcomes regarding the use of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, particularly looking at the impact on complication rates in patients who undergo DIEP flap procedures and are discharged within 5 days after surgery. A computerized search was conducted on September 29th, 2023 using the MeSH terms “Free Tissue Flaps” OR “Myocutaneous Flap” OR “Surgical Flaps” AND “Patient Discharge”. Twenty-four papers reporting on 2059 patients were included in the study, and four study groups were created by length of stay as follows: LOS 1–1.99 days = Group 1, LOS 2–2.99 days = Group 2, LOS 3–3.99 = Group 3, and LOS 4–5 days = Group 4 (control). An independent samples t-test was performed to compare the mean rates of each complication between Groups 1 and 4, Groups 2 and 4, and Groups 3 and 4. This meta-analysis showed no significant differences between rates of hematoma, seroma, infection and reoperation between groups. There was a significantly lower rate of total flap loss in all 3 groups with LOS less than 4 days when compared to the group with LOS between 4 and 5 days. This meta-analysis shows that appropriate patients may be discharged safely as early as POD1 following DIEP flap.
对 2059 例 DIEP 乳瓣乳房再造术后早期出院患者进行评估的 Meta 分析:术后第 5 天前的综合疗效。
与假体重建相比,DIEP皮瓣自体重建在美学满意度和重建治疗过程方面都更令患者满意。然而,DIEP皮瓣乳房重建术需要较长的住院时间来监测皮瓣状态。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在报告术后恢复强化方案(ERAS)的使用效果,尤其是对接受DIEP皮瓣手术并在术后5天内出院的患者并发症发生率的影响。2023 年 9 月 29 日,我们使用 MeSH 术语 "游离组织皮瓣 "或 "肌皮瓣 "或 "外科皮瓣 "和 "患者出院 "进行了计算机检索。研究共纳入了 24 篇论文,报告了 2059 名患者的情况,并按住院时间长短分为以下四个研究组:LOS 1-1.99 天 = 第 1 组,LOS 2-2.99 天 = 第 2 组,LOS 3-3.99 = 第 3 组,LOS 4-5 天 = 第 4 组(对照组)。对第 1 组和第 4 组、第 2 组和第 4 组以及第 3 组和第 4 组之间每种并发症的平均发生率进行了独立样本 t 检验。这项荟萃分析表明,各组之间的血肿、血清肿、感染和再次手术率没有明显差异。与住院时间在 4 至 5 天之间的组别相比,住院时间少于 4 天的 3 个组别中皮瓣全部脱落的比率明显较低。这项荟萃分析表明,DIEP皮瓣术后适当的患者最早可在POD1安全出院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信