Comparative analysis of medical treatments for long-term control of normal tension glaucoma: A systematic review and model-based network meta-analysis.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ting-Kai Yang, Hou-Ting Kuo, Yuh-Jen Ju, Chun-Yi Chen, Wen-Hsien Chen, Albert Y Wu, Chun-Ju Lin, Chien-Chang Lee, Jennifer Hui-Chun Ho
{"title":"Comparative analysis of medical treatments for long-term control of normal tension glaucoma: A systematic review and model-based network meta-analysis.","authors":"Ting-Kai Yang, Hou-Ting Kuo, Yuh-Jen Ju, Chun-Yi Chen, Wen-Hsien Chen, Albert Y Wu, Chun-Ju Lin, Chien-Chang Lee, Jennifer Hui-Chun Ho","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate and compare the long-term efficacy of medical treatments for normal tension glaucoma (NTG) in controlling intraocular pressure (IOP), and establish a hierarchical ranking based on their effectiveness. 'Long-term' is defined as a treatment duration of over 12 weeks in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and model-based network meta-analysis (MBNMA) collected data of 795 patients with 997 eyes from RCTs. Patients with NTG were selected based on strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, with randomsation procedures and masking as reported in the individual trials. Eight different medications were compared, including prostaglandin analogues, beta-blockers, brimonidine, unoprostone isopropyl, brovincamine, and palmitoylethanolamide (PEA). Notably, PEA is an oral medication, while other drugs are topical agents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary outcome is the long-term efficacy of IOP control across medications with different follow-up durations. Among the eight medications, PEA demonstrates the highest efficacy (Surface under the cumulative ranking, SUCRA = 7.46%), followed by two prostaglandin analogues: travoprost (SUCRA = 6.86%) and latanoprost (SUCRA = 6.76%), then two beta-blockers: nipradilol (SUCRA = 4.90%) and timolol (SUCRA = 4.89%). Both brimonidine and unoprostone isopropyl have SUCRA scores below 4.0%, indicating modest but limited efficacy. Brovincamine has the lowest SUCRA score (1.32%), reflecting minimal effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed PEA as a promising agent for long-term IOP control in NTG patients, suggesting potential use as primary or adjunctive therapy. The outcomes call for PEA's consideration in clinical practice and highlight the need for further research into its long-term efficacy and safety for NTG.</p>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate and compare the long-term efficacy of medical treatments for normal tension glaucoma (NTG) in controlling intraocular pressure (IOP), and establish a hierarchical ranking based on their effectiveness. 'Long-term' is defined as a treatment duration of over 12 weeks in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: This systematic review and model-based network meta-analysis (MBNMA) collected data of 795 patients with 997 eyes from RCTs. Patients with NTG were selected based on strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, with randomsation procedures and masking as reported in the individual trials. Eight different medications were compared, including prostaglandin analogues, beta-blockers, brimonidine, unoprostone isopropyl, brovincamine, and palmitoylethanolamide (PEA). Notably, PEA is an oral medication, while other drugs are topical agents.

Results: Primary outcome is the long-term efficacy of IOP control across medications with different follow-up durations. Among the eight medications, PEA demonstrates the highest efficacy (Surface under the cumulative ranking, SUCRA = 7.46%), followed by two prostaglandin analogues: travoprost (SUCRA = 6.86%) and latanoprost (SUCRA = 6.76%), then two beta-blockers: nipradilol (SUCRA = 4.90%) and timolol (SUCRA = 4.89%). Both brimonidine and unoprostone isopropyl have SUCRA scores below 4.0%, indicating modest but limited efficacy. Brovincamine has the lowest SUCRA score (1.32%), reflecting minimal effectiveness.

Conclusions: This study revealed PEA as a promising agent for long-term IOP control in NTG patients, suggesting potential use as primary or adjunctive therapy. The outcomes call for PEA's consideration in clinical practice and highlight the need for further research into its long-term efficacy and safety for NTG.

对长期控制正常张力青光眼的医疗方法进行比较分析:系统综述和基于模型的网络荟萃分析。
背景:评估和比较正常张力青光眼(NTG)药物治疗在控制眼压(IOP)方面的长期疗效,并根据疗效确定等级。在随机对照试验(RCTs)中,"长期 "是指治疗时间超过12周:这项系统性回顾和基于模型的网络荟萃分析(MBNMA)收集了随机对照试验中 795 名患者、997 只眼睛的数据。NTG患者是根据严格的纳入/排除标准筛选出来的,随机化程序和掩蔽方法与各试验报告一致。对八种不同的药物进行了比较,包括前列腺素类似物、β-受体阻滞剂、溴莫尼丁、异丙基异前列酮、溴辛胺和棕榈酰乙醇酰胺(PEA)。值得注意的是,PEA 是一种口服药物,而其他药物则是局部用药:主要结果是不同随访时间的药物对控制眼压的长期疗效。在八种药物中,PEA 的疗效最高(累积排名下的表面积,SUCRA = 7.46%),其次是两种前列腺素类似物:曲伏前列素(SUCRA = 6.86%)和拉坦前列素(SUCRA = 6.76%),然后是两种β-受体阻滞剂:尼普地洛(SUCRA = 4.90%)和噻吗洛尔(SUCRA = 4.89%)。溴莫尼定和异丙基 unoprostone 的 SUCRA 得分均低于 4.0%,表明疗效一般但有限。布洛芬卡明的 SUCRA 得分最低(1.32%),表明疗效甚微:本研究显示,PEA 是一种对 NTG 患者进行长期眼压控制很有前景的药物,有望用作主要或辅助治疗。研究结果要求在临床实践中考虑使用 PEA,并强调需要进一步研究其对 NTG 的长期疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信