Estimating Repetitions in Reserve During the Bench Press Exercise: Should We Consider Sex and the Exercise Equipment?

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Santiago A Ruiz-Alias, Andrés Baena-Raya, Alba Hernández-Martínez, David M Díez-Fernández, Manuel A Rodríguez-Pérez, Alejandro Pérez-Castilla
{"title":"Estimating Repetitions in Reserve During the Bench Press Exercise: Should We Consider Sex and the Exercise Equipment?","authors":"Santiago A Ruiz-Alias, Andrés Baena-Raya, Alba Hernández-Martínez, David M Díez-Fernández, Manuel A Rodríguez-Pérez, Alejandro Pérez-Castilla","doi":"10.1177/19417381241285891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estimating repetitions in reserve (RIR) has been established as a valid and practical method for monitoring set configuration concerning proximity to failure in resistance training. However, factors such as sex and exercise equipment could interfere with the estimation process. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the influence of sex (female vs male) and exercise equipment (free-weight vs Smith machine) on the RIR estimation at different relative loads during the bench press exercise.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Men would be more accurate than women in the RIR estimation, and participants would better perceive their actual effort at the Smith machine compared with the free-weight bench press exercise.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Repeated measures design.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a counterbalanced order, recreationally trained participants (12 female, 14 male) performed 2 identical sessions with the free-weight bench press exercise in 1 week and 2 identical sessions with the Smith machine bench press exercise in another week (first session for familiarization and second session for validity analysis). In each session, participants performed single sets of repetitions to failure against 3 relative loads (65%, 75%, and 85% of the 1-repetition maximum [1RM]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed a significant interaction between RIR and sex at 65% 1RM (<i>P</i> < 0.01; women: -1.2 [-1.7 to -0.6] repetitions; men: -0.1 [-0.6 to 0.3] repetitions), and between RIR and exercise equipment at 65% 1RM (<i>P</i> < 0.01; free-weight: -1.1 [-1.5 to -0.6] repetitions; Smith machine: -0.2 [-0.6 to 0.2] repetitions), but not at 75% and 85% 1RM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RIR estimation is a valid method for monitoring set configuration. However, this method tends to underestimate RIR at 65%1RM with female athletes and in the free-weight exercise for both sexes.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Strength and conditioning coaches should help their athletes understand effort awareness in the aforementioned context.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381241285891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Estimating repetitions in reserve (RIR) has been established as a valid and practical method for monitoring set configuration concerning proximity to failure in resistance training. However, factors such as sex and exercise equipment could interfere with the estimation process. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the influence of sex (female vs male) and exercise equipment (free-weight vs Smith machine) on the RIR estimation at different relative loads during the bench press exercise.

Hypothesis: Men would be more accurate than women in the RIR estimation, and participants would better perceive their actual effort at the Smith machine compared with the free-weight bench press exercise.

Study design: Repeated measures design.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Methods: In a counterbalanced order, recreationally trained participants (12 female, 14 male) performed 2 identical sessions with the free-weight bench press exercise in 1 week and 2 identical sessions with the Smith machine bench press exercise in another week (first session for familiarization and second session for validity analysis). In each session, participants performed single sets of repetitions to failure against 3 relative loads (65%, 75%, and 85% of the 1-repetition maximum [1RM]).

Results: Results revealed a significant interaction between RIR and sex at 65% 1RM (P < 0.01; women: -1.2 [-1.7 to -0.6] repetitions; men: -0.1 [-0.6 to 0.3] repetitions), and between RIR and exercise equipment at 65% 1RM (P < 0.01; free-weight: -1.1 [-1.5 to -0.6] repetitions; Smith machine: -0.2 [-0.6 to 0.2] repetitions), but not at 75% and 85% 1RM.

Conclusions: RIR estimation is a valid method for monitoring set configuration. However, this method tends to underestimate RIR at 65%1RM with female athletes and in the free-weight exercise for both sexes.

Clinical relevance: Strength and conditioning coaches should help their athletes understand effort awareness in the aforementioned context.

估算卧推运动中的储备重复次数:我们是否应该考虑性别和运动器材?
背景:估算储备重复次数(RIR)已被确定为一种有效而实用的方法,用于监测阻力训练中接近失败的成套配置。然而,性别和运动器材等因素可能会干扰估算过程。因此,本研究旨在确定性别(女性 vs 男性)和运动器材(自由重量 vs 史密斯器械)对卧推练习中不同相对负荷下的 RIR 估算的影响:研究设计:重复测量设计:重复测量设计:证据等级:3 级:按照平衡顺序,接受过娱乐训练的参与者(12 名女性,14 名男性)在一周内进行了两次相同的自由重量卧推练习,在另一周内进行了两次相同的史密斯机卧推练习(第一次练习用于熟悉,第二次练习用于有效性分析)。在每次训练中,参与者在 3 种相对负荷(单次最大负重的 65%、75% 和 85%)下进行单组重复训练,直至失败:结果显示,在 65% 1RM 时,RIR 与性别之间存在明显的交互作用(P < 0.01;女性:-1.2 [-1.7 至 -0.6]次;男性:-0.1 [-0.6 至 0.3]次)。3]次),以及在65% 1RM时RIR与运动器械之间的关系(P < 0.01;自由重量:-1.1 [-1.5 to -0.6]次;史密斯机:-0.2 [-0.6 to 0.2]次),但在75%和85% 1RM时没有关系:结论:RIR 估算是监测成套动作配置的有效方法。结论:RIR 估计是监测成套动作配置的有效方法,但这种方法往往会低估女性运动员在 65%1RM 时的 RIR,而且在自由重量练习中,男女运动员的 RIR 都会被低估:临床意义:力量与体能教练应帮助运动员了解在上述情况下的努力意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信