Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Progression and Characteristics of Postoperative Demarcation Lines.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Koby Brosh, Anastasia Semionov, Joel Hanhart, Mordechai Goldberg, Michael J Potter
{"title":"Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Progression and Characteristics of Postoperative Demarcation Lines.","authors":"Koby Brosh, Anastasia Semionov, Joel Hanhart, Mordechai Goldberg, Michael J Potter","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report the characteristics of retinal detachment demarcation lines on infrared (IR) imaging together with retinal detachment progression analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We performed a retrospective case series of 25 eyes of 24 patients who underwent macula off Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair and demonstrated a postoperative demarcation line on in(IR) imaging. All patients had an OCT imaging at baseline capturing the extent of the RRD. Criteria for demarcation lines diagnosis on infrared imaging included a line parallel and with the same contour of the RRD edge. These lines were not observed on IR imaging prior to RRD repair surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demarcation lines' hyperreflectivity was situated in the interdigitation-ellipsoid zone complex. These lines were more obvious on the early postoperative week but faded over time (average disappearance time 2.6 ± 2.9 months). The analysis of retinal detachment progression showed that superior RRDs progressed more than inferior RRDs (611µ Vs 122µ, P=0.02). Among 13 cases with a superior RRD, the temporal border progressed more than the nasal side (697µ Vs 426µ, P=0.01, figure 1). The use of intraoperative perfluorocarbon was associated with less RRD progression (p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that demarcation lines are distinct findings on IR imaging, appearing early but diminishing relatively quickly following RRD repair. It also revealed the characteristics of RRDs progression specifically that inferior RRDs and perfluorocarbon use were associated with less retinal progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004280","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To report the characteristics of retinal detachment demarcation lines on infrared (IR) imaging together with retinal detachment progression analysis.

Method: We performed a retrospective case series of 25 eyes of 24 patients who underwent macula off Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair and demonstrated a postoperative demarcation line on in(IR) imaging. All patients had an OCT imaging at baseline capturing the extent of the RRD. Criteria for demarcation lines diagnosis on infrared imaging included a line parallel and with the same contour of the RRD edge. These lines were not observed on IR imaging prior to RRD repair surgery.

Results: Demarcation lines' hyperreflectivity was situated in the interdigitation-ellipsoid zone complex. These lines were more obvious on the early postoperative week but faded over time (average disappearance time 2.6 ± 2.9 months). The analysis of retinal detachment progression showed that superior RRDs progressed more than inferior RRDs (611µ Vs 122µ, P=0.02). Among 13 cases with a superior RRD, the temporal border progressed more than the nasal side (697µ Vs 426µ, P=0.01, figure 1). The use of intraoperative perfluorocarbon was associated with less RRD progression (p=0.01).

Conclusion: The study concludes that demarcation lines are distinct findings on IR imaging, appearing early but diminishing relatively quickly following RRD repair. It also revealed the characteristics of RRDs progression specifically that inferior RRDs and perfluorocarbon use were associated with less retinal progression.

流变性视网膜脱离:手术后分界线的进展和特征。
目的:报告视网膜脱离分界线在红外线(IR)成像上的特征以及视网膜脱离进展分析:方法:我们对 24 名患者的 25 只眼睛进行了回顾性病例系列研究,这些患者接受了黄斑脱落流变性视网膜脱离(RRD)修复术,并在红外成像中显示出术后分界线。所有患者在基线时都进行了 OCT 成像,以捕捉 RRD 的范围。红外成像诊断分界线的标准包括与 RRD 边缘平行且轮廓相同的线。在 RRD 修复手术前,红外成像中未观察到这些分界线:结果:分界线的高反射位于结节间-椭圆形区复合体。这些线条在术后第一周较为明显,但随着时间的推移逐渐消失(平均消失时间为 2.6 ± 2.9 个月)。视网膜脱离进展分析表明,上部 RRD 比下部 RRD 进展更快(611µ Vs 122µ,P=0.02)。在13例上部RRD病例中,颞侧比鼻侧进展更快(697µ Vs 426µ,P=0.01,图1)。术中使用全氟碳化物与 RRD 进展较少有关(P=0.01):该研究得出结论,分界线是红外成像的独特发现,早期出现,但在 RRD 修复后会相对较快地消失。研究还揭示了RRD进展的特点,特别是下位RRD和使用全氟碳化合物与视网膜进展较少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信