Comparison of the effect of different doses of phenylephrine infusion on the prevention of hypotension in the elderly under spinal anaesthesia in orthopaedic surgery.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Mitra Golmohammadi, Shahryar Sane, Wesam R Kadhum, Ahmed Hjazi, Mohammed N Fenjan, Farnaz Mahmoudifar, Behzad Kazemi Haki, Mehri Soodagar Eskandarabadi, Somayeh Ghavipanjeh Rezaiy
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of different doses of phenylephrine infusion on the prevention of hypotension in the elderly under spinal anaesthesia in orthopaedic surgery.","authors":"Mitra Golmohammadi, Shahryar Sane, Wesam R Kadhum, Ahmed Hjazi, Mohammed N Fenjan, Farnaz Mahmoudifar, Behzad Kazemi Haki, Mehri Soodagar Eskandarabadi, Somayeh Ghavipanjeh Rezaiy","doi":"10.1177/17504589241274470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the vasopressor drug categories and doses that can be used for elderly patients following hypotension are few, the present trial aimed to compare the effect of different doses of phenylephrine infusion on the prevention of hypotension in elderly patients undergoing orthopaedic lower extremities surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomised, double-blind prospective clinical trial was conducted by including 60 elderly patients older than 60 years and classified as American Society of Anesthesiology class I and II who were candidates for femur fracture fixation surgery. White and black cards randomly allocated patients to: group A (25µg/kg/h phenylephrine) or group B (35µg/kg/h phenylephrine).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the T<sub>3</sub>-T<sub>7</sub> time points, group A's systolic and diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher than in group B's (p < 0.05). However, after 27 minutes (T<sub>0</sub>-T<sub>7</sub>) of phenylephrine infusion, statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups regarding blood pressure (T<sub>8</sub>-T<sub>end</sub>). The frequency of bradycardia and reactive hypertension in group B were significantly higher than in group A (p = 0.02) and (p = 0.03), respectively. There was no significant difference between the bleeding loss, blood transfusion and crystalloid volume in both groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our trial illustrated that high-dose phenylephrine infusion could not assure haemodynamic stability and may cause some side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241274470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Considering the vasopressor drug categories and doses that can be used for elderly patients following hypotension are few, the present trial aimed to compare the effect of different doses of phenylephrine infusion on the prevention of hypotension in elderly patients undergoing orthopaedic lower extremities surgery.

Methods: This randomised, double-blind prospective clinical trial was conducted by including 60 elderly patients older than 60 years and classified as American Society of Anesthesiology class I and II who were candidates for femur fracture fixation surgery. White and black cards randomly allocated patients to: group A (25µg/kg/h phenylephrine) or group B (35µg/kg/h phenylephrine).

Results: At the T3-T7 time points, group A's systolic and diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher than in group B's (p < 0.05). However, after 27 minutes (T0-T7) of phenylephrine infusion, statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups regarding blood pressure (T8-Tend). The frequency of bradycardia and reactive hypertension in group B were significantly higher than in group A (p = 0.02) and (p = 0.03), respectively. There was no significant difference between the bleeding loss, blood transfusion and crystalloid volume in both groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Our trial illustrated that high-dose phenylephrine infusion could not assure haemodynamic stability and may cause some side effects.

比较不同剂量的苯肾上腺素输注对预防骨科手术脊髓麻醉中老年人低血压的效果。
背景:考虑到可用于老年低血压患者的血管加压药物种类和剂量较少,本试验旨在比较输注不同剂量的苯肾上腺素对老年下肢骨科手术患者预防低血压的效果:这项随机双盲前瞻性临床试验纳入了 60 名年龄在 60 岁以上、美国麻醉学会分级为 I 级和 II 级的股骨骨折固定手术老年患者。白卡和黑卡将患者随机分配到 A 组(25µg/kg/h 苯肾上腺素)或 B 组(35µg/kg/h 苯肾上腺素):在T3-T7时间点,A组的收缩压和舒张压明显高于B组(P 0-T7),统计分析显示两组血压(T8-Tend)无明显差异。B 组出现心动过缓和反应性高血压的频率分别明显高于 A 组(P = 0.02)和(P = 0.03)。两组的失血量、输血量和晶体液量无明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:我们的试验表明,大剂量输注苯肾上腺素不能保证血流动力学稳定,而且可能会引起一些副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信