Preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting improves the incidence of positive margins in pathological T2 prostate cancer.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kohei Kobatake, Keisuke Goto, Yukiko Honda, Miki Naito, Kenshiro Takemoto, Shunsuke Miyamoto, Yohei Sekino, Hiroyuki Kitano, Kenichiro Ikeda, Keisuke Hieda, Akihiro Goriki, Nobuyuki Hinata
{"title":"Preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting improves the incidence of positive margins in pathological T2 prostate cancer.","authors":"Kohei Kobatake, Keisuke Goto, Yukiko Honda, Miki Naito, Kenshiro Takemoto, Shunsuke Miyamoto, Yohei Sekino, Hiroyuki Kitano, Kenichiro Ikeda, Keisuke Hieda, Akihiro Goriki, Nobuyuki Hinata","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05261-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Positive surgical margins (PSM) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa) can increase the risk of biochemical recurrence and PCa-specific mortality. We aimed to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) on reducing the incidence of PSM following RARP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected the clinical data of consecutive patients undergoing RARP at Hiroshima University between February 2017 and October 2023. The MDTM, comprising a radiologist, uropathologist, and urologist, reviewed the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate biopsy results of each patient before RARP and considered the areas requiring attention during RARP. Surgeons were categorized as experienced or non-experienced based on the number of RARP procedures performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the pT2 population, the PSM rate was significantly lower in cases evaluated using the MDTM than in those not (11.1% vs. 24.0%; p = 0.0067). Cox regression analysis identified that a PSA level > 7 ng/mL (hazard ratio 2.2799) and nerve-sparing procedures (hazard ratio 2.2619) were independent predictors of increased PSM risk while conducting an MDTM (hazard ratio 0.4773) was an independent predictor of reduced PSM risk in the pT2 population. In the pathological T3 population, there was no significant difference in PSM rates between cases evaluated and not evaluated at an MDTM. In cases evaluated at an MDTM, similar PSM rates were observed regardless of surgeon experience (10.4% for non-experienced and 11.9% for experienced surgeons; p = 0.9999).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An MDTM can improve the PSM rate of pT2 PCa following RARP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05261-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Positive surgical margins (PSM) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa) can increase the risk of biochemical recurrence and PCa-specific mortality. We aimed to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) on reducing the incidence of PSM following RARP.

Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of consecutive patients undergoing RARP at Hiroshima University between February 2017 and October 2023. The MDTM, comprising a radiologist, uropathologist, and urologist, reviewed the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate biopsy results of each patient before RARP and considered the areas requiring attention during RARP. Surgeons were categorized as experienced or non-experienced based on the number of RARP procedures performed.

Results: In the pT2 population, the PSM rate was significantly lower in cases evaluated using the MDTM than in those not (11.1% vs. 24.0%; p = 0.0067). Cox regression analysis identified that a PSA level > 7 ng/mL (hazard ratio 2.2799) and nerve-sparing procedures (hazard ratio 2.2619) were independent predictors of increased PSM risk while conducting an MDTM (hazard ratio 0.4773) was an independent predictor of reduced PSM risk in the pT2 population. In the pathological T3 population, there was no significant difference in PSM rates between cases evaluated and not evaluated at an MDTM. In cases evaluated at an MDTM, similar PSM rates were observed regardless of surgeon experience (10.4% for non-experienced and 11.9% for experienced surgeons; p = 0.9999).

Conclusions: An MDTM can improve the PSM rate of pT2 PCa following RARP.

术前多学科团队会议提高了病理T2前列腺癌阳性边缘的发生率。
目的:前列腺癌(PCa)机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后的手术切缘阳性(PSM)会增加生化复发风险和PCa特异性死亡率。我们旨在评估多学科团队会议(MDTM)对降低 RARP 术后 PSM 发生率的影响:我们回顾性收集了 2017 年 2 月至 2023 年 10 月期间在广岛大学接受 RARP 的连续患者的临床数据。由放射科医生、泌尿病理科医生和泌尿科医生组成的MDTM在RARP术前审查了每位患者的术前磁共振成像(MRI)和前列腺活检结果,并考虑了RARP术中需要注意的地方。根据外科医生实施 RARP 手术的次数将其分为有经验和无经验两类:在pT2人群中,使用MDTM评估的病例的PSM率明显低于未使用MDTM的病例(11.1% vs. 24.0%; p = 0.0067)。Cox 回归分析表明,PSA 水平大于 7 ng/mL(危险比 2.2799)和保神经手术(危险比 2.2619)是增加 PSM 风险的独立预测因素,而在 pT2 群体中,进行 MDTM(危险比 0.4773)是降低 PSM 风险的独立预测因素。在病理 T3 群体中,接受 MDTM 评估和未接受 MDTM 评估的病例之间的 PSM 发生率无显著差异。在经过MDTM评估的病例中,无论外科医生的经验如何,都观察到了相似的PSM率(无经验外科医生为10.4%,有经验外科医生为11.9%;P = 0.9999):结论:MDTM 可以提高 RARP 术后 pT2 PCa 的 PSM 率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信