A randomized comparison of an adhesive gelatin sponge and a plain collagen sponge for hemostatic control during canine liver surgery.

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Thomas S Anderson, Rachel D Hattersley, Jackie L Demetriou
{"title":"A randomized comparison of an adhesive gelatin sponge and a plain collagen sponge for hemostatic control during canine liver surgery.","authors":"Thomas S Anderson, Rachel D Hattersley, Jackie L Demetriou","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of a modified surface gelatin sponge to a plain collagen sponge for hemostasis of parenchymal hepatic bleeding.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective, randomized trial of two hemostatic agents.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>A total of 45 dogs undergoing elective liver surgery were randomly allocated into two groups: 22 in the adhesive gelatin (AG) group and 23 in the plain collagen (PC) group. A total of 20 patients per group underwent liver biopsy to create a uniformly sized bleeding surface, with the remaining patients (AG = 2, PC = 3) undergoing liver lobectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Evaluation of hemostatic effectiveness and tissue adhesion of each sponge type was performed by the operating surgeon using structured scoring systems. Hemostatic parameters were primarily evaluated at the liver biopsy site to maintain homogeneity of bleeding surface size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the liver biopsy group (n = 40), 5 min after hemostatic sponge application, 10/20 dogs were bleeding in the PC group, compared to 2/20 in AG group (p = .0138). The PC bleeding was significantly higher than AG across the 3 to 6 min evaluation period (p < .001). When surgeons tested the adhesion of the sponge across the whole cohort (n = 45), AG scored 2 (of 3) against 1 for PC (p < .001). In group PC, 5/23 sponges dislodged during abdominal lavage and preparations for closure and had to be replaced due to recurrence of bleeding, compared with no AG sponges dislodging (p = .042). There were no further complications related to the use of either sponge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the dogs with hepatic parenchymal incision, use of an adhesive gelatin sponge improved intraoperative attachment and haemostatic effectiveness, compared to a collagen sponge.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Based on our clinical experience in these cases, adhesive gelatin sponges could be considered an effective option when selecting a hemostatic agent for liver surgery in dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a modified surface gelatin sponge to a plain collagen sponge for hemostasis of parenchymal hepatic bleeding.

Study design: Prospective, randomized trial of two hemostatic agents.

Animals: A total of 45 dogs undergoing elective liver surgery were randomly allocated into two groups: 22 in the adhesive gelatin (AG) group and 23 in the plain collagen (PC) group. A total of 20 patients per group underwent liver biopsy to create a uniformly sized bleeding surface, with the remaining patients (AG = 2, PC = 3) undergoing liver lobectomy.

Methods: Evaluation of hemostatic effectiveness and tissue adhesion of each sponge type was performed by the operating surgeon using structured scoring systems. Hemostatic parameters were primarily evaluated at the liver biopsy site to maintain homogeneity of bleeding surface size.

Results: For the liver biopsy group (n = 40), 5 min after hemostatic sponge application, 10/20 dogs were bleeding in the PC group, compared to 2/20 in AG group (p = .0138). The PC bleeding was significantly higher than AG across the 3 to 6 min evaluation period (p < .001). When surgeons tested the adhesion of the sponge across the whole cohort (n = 45), AG scored 2 (of 3) against 1 for PC (p < .001). In group PC, 5/23 sponges dislodged during abdominal lavage and preparations for closure and had to be replaced due to recurrence of bleeding, compared with no AG sponges dislodging (p = .042). There were no further complications related to the use of either sponge.

Conclusion: In the dogs with hepatic parenchymal incision, use of an adhesive gelatin sponge improved intraoperative attachment and haemostatic effectiveness, compared to a collagen sponge.

Clinical significance: Based on our clinical experience in these cases, adhesive gelatin sponges could be considered an effective option when selecting a hemostatic agent for liver surgery in dogs.

在犬肝脏手术中,随机比较粘合明胶海绵和普通胶原蛋白海绵的止血控制效果。
目的:比较改良表面明胶海绵和普通胶原蛋白海绵在肝实质出血止血方面的效果:比较改良表面明胶海绵和普通胶原蛋白海绵对肝实质出血止血的效果:研究设计:两种止血剂的前瞻性随机试验:共 45 只接受择期肝脏手术的狗被随机分为两组:22 只在粘合明胶(AG)组,23 只在普通胶原(PC)组。每组共有 20 名患者接受肝活检,以形成大小一致的出血面,其余患者(AG = 2,PC = 3)接受肝叶切除术:方法:由手术医生使用结构化评分系统对每种海绵的止血效果和组织粘附性进行评估。止血参数主要在肝活检部位进行评估,以保持出血面大小的一致性:在肝活检组(n = 40)中,使用止血海绵 5 分钟后,PC 组有 10/20 只犬出血,而 AG 组只有 2/20 只犬出血(p = .0138)。在 3 到 6 分钟的评估期间,PC 组的出血量明显高于 AG 组(p 结论:PC 组出血量明显高于 AG 组):与胶原蛋白海绵相比,在肝实质切口犬中使用粘性明胶海绵可提高术中附着力和止血效果:临床意义:根据我们在这些病例中的临床经验,在为狗的肝脏手术选择止血剂时,可将粘合明胶海绵视为一种有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信