Hybrid modality dual-energy imaging aggregating complementary advantages of kV-CT and MV-CBCT: concept proposal and clinical validation.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Junfeng Qi, Shutong Yu, Zhengkun Dong, Jiang Liu, Juan Deng, Guojian Mei, Chuou Yin, Qiao Li, Tian Li, Shi Wang, Yibao Zhang
{"title":"Hybrid modality dual-energy imaging aggregating complementary advantages of kV-CT and MV-CBCT: concept proposal and clinical validation.","authors":"Junfeng Qi, Shutong Yu, Zhengkun Dong, Jiang Liu, Juan Deng, Guojian Mei, Chuou Yin, Qiao Li, Tian Li, Shi Wang, Yibao Zhang","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad84b1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Megavoltage cone-beam CT (MV-CBCT) is advantageous in metal artifact reduction during Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT), although it is limited by poor soft tissue contrast. This study proposed and evaluated a novel hybrid modality dual-energy (DE) imaging method combining the complementary advantages of kV-CT and MV-CBCT.&#xD;Approach: The kV-CT and MV-CBCT images were acquired on a planning CT scanner and a Halcyon linear accelerator respectively. After rigid registration, images of basis materials were generated using the iterative decomposition method in the volumetric images. The decomposition accuracy was quantitatively evaluated on a Gammex 1472 phantom. The performance of contrast enhancement and metal artifact reduction in virtual monochromatic images were evaluated on both phantom and patient studies.&#xD;Main results: Using the proposed method, the mean percentage errors for RED and SPR were 0.90% and 0.81%, outperforming the clinical single-energy mapping method with mean errors of 1.28% and 1.07%, respectively. The contrasts of soft-tissue insets were enhanced by a factor of 2~3 at 40 keV compared to kV-CT. The standard deviation in the metal artifact area was reduced by ~67%, from 42 HU (kV-CT) to 14 HU (150 keV monochromatic). The head and neck patient test showed that the percent error of soft-tissue RED in the metal artifact area was reduced from 18.1% (HU-RED conversion) to less than 1.0% (the proposed method), which was equivalent to the maximum dosimetric difference of 28.7% based on the patient-specific plan.&#xD;Significance: Without hardware modification or extra imaging dose, the proposed hybrid modality method enabled kV-MV DE imaging, providing improved accuracy of quantitative analysis, soft-tissue contrast and metal artifact suppression for more accurate IGRT.&#xD.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad84b1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Megavoltage cone-beam CT (MV-CBCT) is advantageous in metal artifact reduction during Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT), although it is limited by poor soft tissue contrast. This study proposed and evaluated a novel hybrid modality dual-energy (DE) imaging method combining the complementary advantages of kV-CT and MV-CBCT. Approach: The kV-CT and MV-CBCT images were acquired on a planning CT scanner and a Halcyon linear accelerator respectively. After rigid registration, images of basis materials were generated using the iterative decomposition method in the volumetric images. The decomposition accuracy was quantitatively evaluated on a Gammex 1472 phantom. The performance of contrast enhancement and metal artifact reduction in virtual monochromatic images were evaluated on both phantom and patient studies. Main results: Using the proposed method, the mean percentage errors for RED and SPR were 0.90% and 0.81%, outperforming the clinical single-energy mapping method with mean errors of 1.28% and 1.07%, respectively. The contrasts of soft-tissue insets were enhanced by a factor of 2~3 at 40 keV compared to kV-CT. The standard deviation in the metal artifact area was reduced by ~67%, from 42 HU (kV-CT) to 14 HU (150 keV monochromatic). The head and neck patient test showed that the percent error of soft-tissue RED in the metal artifact area was reduced from 18.1% (HU-RED conversion) to less than 1.0% (the proposed method), which was equivalent to the maximum dosimetric difference of 28.7% based on the patient-specific plan. Significance: Without hardware modification or extra imaging dose, the proposed hybrid modality method enabled kV-MV DE imaging, providing improved accuracy of quantitative analysis, soft-tissue contrast and metal artifact suppression for more accurate IGRT. .

集合 kV-CT 和 MV-CBCT 互补优势的混合模式双能量成像:概念提案和临床验证。
目的:巨电压锥束 CT(MV-CBCT)在图像引导放疗(IGRT)过程中具有减少金属伪影的优势,但它受到软组织对比度差的限制。本研究提出并评估了一种新型混合模式双能量(DE)成像方法,该方法结合了 kV-CT 和 MV-CBCT 的互补优势:分别在规划 CT 扫描仪和 Halcyon 直线加速器上获取 kV-CT 和 MV-CBCT 图像。经过刚性配准后,在容积图像中使用迭代分解法生成基础材料图像。在 Gammex 1472 模型上对分解的准确性进行了定量评估。在模型和患者研究中评估了虚拟单色图像中对比度增强和金属伪影减少的性能:使用建议的方法,RED 和 SPR 的平均百分比误差分别为 0.90% 和 0.81%,优于平均误差分别为 1.28% 和 1.07% 的临床单能量映射方法。与 kV-CT 相比,40 keV 下的软组织嵌入对比度提高了 2~3 倍。金属伪影区域的标准偏差降低了约 67%,从 42 HU(kV-CT)降至 14 HU(150 keV 单色)。头颈部患者测试表明,金属伪影区域的软组织 RED 百分比误差从 18.1%(HU-RED 转换)降低到 1.0%(建议方法)以下,这相当于根据特定患者计划的最大剂量学差异 28.7%:在不修改硬件或增加成像剂量的情况下,拟议的混合模式方法实现了 kV-MV DE 成像,提高了定量分析的准确性、软组织对比度和金属伪影抑制,从而实现了更精确的 IGRT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信