Differences in vascular tissue response after stent implantation between biolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents: a sub-study of the NEXT study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hajime Imai, Masanori Kawasaki, Akihiro Yoshida, Hiromitsu Kanamori, Hiroyuki Okura
{"title":"Differences in vascular tissue response after stent implantation between biolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents: a sub-study of the NEXT study.","authors":"Hajime Imai, Masanori Kawasaki, Akihiro Yoshida, Hiromitsu Kanamori, Hiroyuki Okura","doi":"10.1007/s00380-024-02467-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>NEXT [NOBORI biolimus-eluting stent (BES) versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent (EES) trial] was a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial that included 3235 patients with 8-12 months of follow-up imaging at 18 centers. IB-IVUS images were analyzed at an interval of 0.5 mm using a motorized pull-back system in each plaque that required stent implantation. We analyzed seven cross-sections at the site of minimal lumen area and ten cross-sections in proximal and distal peripheral sites prior to the procedure, after stent implantation and after 8 months. We averaged the relative blue volume, relative green volume, relative yellow volume, and relative red volume across seven cross-sections using the manufacturer's default setting. Fifty-four lesions in 50 patients were analyzed. There were 28 lesions in 25 patients in the EES group and 26 lesions in 25 patients in the BES group. The patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups except high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. There were no significant differences before and after stent implantation after 8 months in relative red volume, relative yellow volume, relative green volume or relative blue volume. Although the present study was likely underpowered for statistical analyses and larger populations are needed to confirm the conclusions, the vascular response regarding tissue characterization was similar between EES and BES, even though the thickness and releasing materials differed between the stents.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02467-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

NEXT [NOBORI biolimus-eluting stent (BES) versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent (EES) trial] was a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial that included 3235 patients with 8-12 months of follow-up imaging at 18 centers. IB-IVUS images were analyzed at an interval of 0.5 mm using a motorized pull-back system in each plaque that required stent implantation. We analyzed seven cross-sections at the site of minimal lumen area and ten cross-sections in proximal and distal peripheral sites prior to the procedure, after stent implantation and after 8 months. We averaged the relative blue volume, relative green volume, relative yellow volume, and relative red volume across seven cross-sections using the manufacturer's default setting. Fifty-four lesions in 50 patients were analyzed. There were 28 lesions in 25 patients in the EES group and 26 lesions in 25 patients in the BES group. The patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups except high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. There were no significant differences before and after stent implantation after 8 months in relative red volume, relative yellow volume, relative green volume or relative blue volume. Although the present study was likely underpowered for statistical analyses and larger populations are needed to confirm the conclusions, the vascular response regarding tissue characterization was similar between EES and BES, even though the thickness and releasing materials differed between the stents.

比奥利姆斯洗脱支架和依维莫司洗脱支架植入后血管组织反应的差异:NEXT 研究的一项子研究。
NEXT[NOBORI生物利莫司洗脱支架(BES)与 XIENCE/PROMUS 依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)试验]是一项多中心、随机、前瞻性试验,共纳入 3235 例患者,在 18 个中心进行了 8-12 个月的随访成像。在每个需要植入支架的斑块中,使用电动回拉系统以 0.5 毫米的间隔对 IB-IVUS 图像进行分析。在手术前、支架植入后和 8 个月后,我们分析了最小管腔面积部位的 7 个横截面以及近端和远端外周部位的 10 个横截面。我们使用制造商的默认设置对七个横截面的相对蓝色体积、相对绿色体积、相对黄色体积和相对红色体积进行平均。我们对 50 名患者的 54 个病灶进行了分析。EES 组 25 名患者中有 28 个病灶,BES 组 25 名患者中有 26 个病灶。除高密度脂蛋白胆固醇外,两组患者的特征无明显差异。8 个月后,在相对红色体积、相对黄色体积、相对绿色体积或相对蓝色体积方面,支架植入前后无明显差异。尽管本研究的统计分析能力可能不足,而且需要更多的人群来证实结论,但尽管 EES 和 BES 支架的厚度和释放材料不同,但它们在组织特征方面的血管反应相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信