The impact of high intensity training and sports on recipients of solid organ transplants: a narrative review.

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2024-09-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1439399
A Kayeye, I Triantafyllou, S Mathur, T Janaudis-Ferreira
{"title":"The impact of high intensity training and sports on recipients of solid organ transplants: a narrative review.","authors":"A Kayeye, I Triantafyllou, S Mathur, T Janaudis-Ferreira","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1439399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>High intensity exercise in individuals post solid organ transplant (SOT) remains a largely understudied phenomenon, with potential risks and benefits. Additionally, the optimal training protocols are still unclear. This narrative review aimed to explore the impact of high-intensity exercise training and strenuous sports on solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a narrative review of intervention studies of any design that included high-intensity exercise training and cross-sectional studies of strenuous sports and activities. Additionally, we reviewed individual reports documenting post-SOT performance at highly competitive or physiological levels. We used MEDLINE to search for relevant articles followed by a manual search for additional articles. Data were extracted and results were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High-intensity and strenuous exercise appears to be safe among stable SOTRs. High-intensity protocols consistently demonstrated improvements in VO2peak and a reduction in coronary artery disease prevalence, though findings related to body composition, health-related quality of life outcomes, and cardiovascular exercise variables were inconsistent. Pre-transplant athletes showcase notable achievements and physiological adaptations post-transplantation, highlighting the capacity for athletic performance among this population. However, caution is warranted in interpreting the findings from these studies due to limitations in generalizability and other methodological limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As evidenced by current literature, high intensity exercise emerges as a promising exercise method for safely improving various physiological parameters, and reducing the prevalence of coronary heart disease in SOTRs. It can induce similar or greater effects to moderate intensity exercise, however follow-up studies indicate low retention. Further research of higher methodological rigor is warranted in this field to advance understanding, and to guide evidence-based practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1439399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: High intensity exercise in individuals post solid organ transplant (SOT) remains a largely understudied phenomenon, with potential risks and benefits. Additionally, the optimal training protocols are still unclear. This narrative review aimed to explore the impact of high-intensity exercise training and strenuous sports on solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs).

Methods: We conducted a narrative review of intervention studies of any design that included high-intensity exercise training and cross-sectional studies of strenuous sports and activities. Additionally, we reviewed individual reports documenting post-SOT performance at highly competitive or physiological levels. We used MEDLINE to search for relevant articles followed by a manual search for additional articles. Data were extracted and results were summarized.

Results: High-intensity and strenuous exercise appears to be safe among stable SOTRs. High-intensity protocols consistently demonstrated improvements in VO2peak and a reduction in coronary artery disease prevalence, though findings related to body composition, health-related quality of life outcomes, and cardiovascular exercise variables were inconsistent. Pre-transplant athletes showcase notable achievements and physiological adaptations post-transplantation, highlighting the capacity for athletic performance among this population. However, caution is warranted in interpreting the findings from these studies due to limitations in generalizability and other methodological limitations.

Conclusion: As evidenced by current literature, high intensity exercise emerges as a promising exercise method for safely improving various physiological parameters, and reducing the prevalence of coronary heart disease in SOTRs. It can induce similar or greater effects to moderate intensity exercise, however follow-up studies indicate low retention. Further research of higher methodological rigor is warranted in this field to advance understanding, and to guide evidence-based practice.

高强度训练和运动对实体器官移植受者的影响:叙述性综述。
目的:对实体器官移植(SOT)后患者进行高强度运动的研究在很大程度上仍然不足,而且存在潜在的风险和益处。此外,最佳训练方案仍不明确。本综述旨在探讨高强度运动训练和剧烈运动对实体器官移植受者(SOTRs)的影响:我们对包含高强度运动训练的任何设计的干预研究以及剧烈运动和活动的横断面研究进行了叙述性综述。此外,我们还查阅了记录SOT后在高竞技或生理水平上表现的个人报告。我们使用 MEDLINE 搜索相关文章,然后手动搜索其他文章。我们对数据进行了提取,并对结果进行了总结:高强度和剧烈运动在稳定的 SOTR 中似乎是安全的。尽管与身体成分、健康相关的生活质量结果和心血管运动变量相关的研究结果不一致,但高强度方案始终显示出VO2峰值的改善和冠状动脉疾病患病率的降低。移植前的运动员在移植后展示了显著的成就和生理适应能力,突出了这一人群的运动能力。然而,由于普遍性和其他方法上的局限性,在解释这些研究结果时需要谨慎:从目前的文献来看,高强度运动是一种很有前景的运动方法,可安全地改善各种生理参数,并降低 SOTR 中冠心病的发病率。它能产生与中等强度运动相似或更大的效果,但后续研究表明,这种运动的保持率较低。在这一领域,有必要进一步开展更严格的方法学研究,以加深理解并指导循证实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信