Comparison Between Powered and Manual Toothbrushes Effectiveness for Maintaining an Optimal Oral Health Status.

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-10-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCIDE.S490156
Chin-Hsuan Yeh, Chia-Hsuan Lin, Tien-Li Ma, Tzu-Yu Peng, Thi Thuy Tien Vo, Wei-Ning Lin, Yu-Hsu Chen, I-Ta Lee
{"title":"Comparison Between Powered and Manual Toothbrushes Effectiveness for Maintaining an Optimal Oral Health Status.","authors":"Chin-Hsuan Yeh, Chia-Hsuan Lin, Tien-Li Ma, Tzu-Yu Peng, Thi Thuy Tien Vo, Wei-Ning Lin, Yu-Hsu Chen, I-Ta Lee","doi":"10.2147/CCIDE.S490156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This integrative literature review evaluates the effectiveness of power toothbrushes (PTBs) compared to manual toothbrushes (MTBs) across various populations, focusing on plaque removal, gingival health, calculus reduction, and stain removal. PTBs equipped with advanced technologies such as oscillating-rotating and high-frequency sonic mechanisms have been examined for their potential to enhance oral hygiene. Special attention is given to vulnerable groups, including the elderly and individuals with intellectual disabilities, to assess how PTBs meet their specific oral health needs. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar using keywords such as \"power toothbrush\", \"electric toothbrush\", \"manual toothbrush\", \"plaque removal\", \"gingivitis\", \"calculus\", \"dental stains\", \"oral hygiene\", \"elderly\", and \"intellectual disabilities\". Studies published between 2000 and 2024 were selected based on their relevance to the PTB and MTB comparison, with an emphasis on outcomes related to oral hygiene efficacy. As this review is narrative rather than systematic, it focuses on synthesizing existing knowledge without applying strict inclusion or exclusion criteria. The results indicate that PTBs generally outperform MTBs in reducing plaque, gingivitis, and stains, though the benefits for special populations are less pronounced but still significant. However, practical issues such as user experience and mechanical reliability of PTBs warrant further investigation. In conclusion, this review enhances the understanding of PTB effectiveness, guides consumer choices, and informs future technological advancements in dental care practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":10445,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","volume":"16 ","pages":"381-396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S490156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This integrative literature review evaluates the effectiveness of power toothbrushes (PTBs) compared to manual toothbrushes (MTBs) across various populations, focusing on plaque removal, gingival health, calculus reduction, and stain removal. PTBs equipped with advanced technologies such as oscillating-rotating and high-frequency sonic mechanisms have been examined for their potential to enhance oral hygiene. Special attention is given to vulnerable groups, including the elderly and individuals with intellectual disabilities, to assess how PTBs meet their specific oral health needs. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar using keywords such as "power toothbrush", "electric toothbrush", "manual toothbrush", "plaque removal", "gingivitis", "calculus", "dental stains", "oral hygiene", "elderly", and "intellectual disabilities". Studies published between 2000 and 2024 were selected based on their relevance to the PTB and MTB comparison, with an emphasis on outcomes related to oral hygiene efficacy. As this review is narrative rather than systematic, it focuses on synthesizing existing knowledge without applying strict inclusion or exclusion criteria. The results indicate that PTBs generally outperform MTBs in reducing plaque, gingivitis, and stains, though the benefits for special populations are less pronounced but still significant. However, practical issues such as user experience and mechanical reliability of PTBs warrant further investigation. In conclusion, this review enhances the understanding of PTB effectiveness, guides consumer choices, and informs future technological advancements in dental care practices.

比较电动牙刷和手动牙刷在保持最佳口腔健康状态方面的功效。
这篇综合文献综述评估了电动牙刷(PTB)与手动牙刷(MTB)相比在不同人群中的有效性,重点关注牙菌斑去除、牙龈健康、牙结石减少和污渍去除。电动牙刷配备了摆动旋转和高频声波机制等先进技术,对其改善口腔卫生的潜力进行了研究。研究特别关注弱势群体,包括老年人和智障人士,以评估电动牙刷如何满足他们特定的口腔健康需求。我们使用 "电动牙刷"、"电动牙刷"、"手动牙刷"、"去除牙菌斑"、"牙龈炎"、"牙结石"、"牙渍"、"口腔卫生"、"老年人 "和 "智障人士 "等关键词在 PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase 和 Google Scholar 等数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。根据与 PTB 和 MTB 比较的相关性,选择了 2000 年至 2024 年间发表的研究,重点是与口腔卫生效果相关的结果。由于本综述是叙述性的而非系统性的,因此重点在于综合现有的知识,而没有采用严格的纳入或排除标准。研究结果表明,在减少牙菌斑、牙龈炎和牙渍方面,PTB 普遍优于 MTB,虽然对特殊人群的益处不那么明显,但仍然很显著。然而,诸如用户体验和 PTB 机械可靠性等实际问题还需要进一步研究。总之,这篇综述加深了人们对PTB有效性的了解,为消费者的选择提供了指导,并为未来牙科护理实践中的技术进步提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
43
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信