Clinical Efficacy of Microwave Ablation Combined with Percutaneous Osteoplasty in the Treatment of Flat Bone Metastases.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Management and Research Pub Date : 2024-10-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S482477
Zhipeng Lin, Xiaolong Hu, Dabei Huang, Xugong Zou, Yuan Chen, Xiaoqun Li, Jian Zhang
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy of Microwave Ablation Combined with Percutaneous Osteoplasty in the Treatment of Flat Bone Metastases.","authors":"Zhipeng Lin, Xiaolong Hu, Dabei Huang, Xugong Zou, Yuan Chen, Xiaoqun Li, Jian Zhang","doi":"10.2147/CMAR.S482477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of microwave ablation combined with percutaneous osteoplasty (MWA + PO group) versus percutaneous osteoplasty (PO group) for the treatment of flat bone metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with flat bone metastases and intractable pain who underwent PO and/or MWA from January 2016 to January 2023 in our hospital were included, with 36 cases in the MWA+PO group and 21 cases in the PO group. Changes in the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and quality of life assessment scale(QOL) were evaluated regularly. Postoperative complications and target lesion tumor treatment responses were also observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS and ODI in both the MWA+PO group and the PO group significantly decreased at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively, The VAS and ODI in the MWA+PO group were lower than those in the PO group postoperatively. The QOL in both the MWA+PO group and the PO group significantly increased at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively, with the QOL in the MWA+PO group being higher than that in the PO group postoperatively. According to the mRECIST criteria (target lesion tumor treatment response), the ORR in the MWA+PO group and PO group was 52.8% and 9.5%, respectively, while the DCR was 94.4% and 57.1%, respectively (P <0.001 and<0.001). Different degrees of bone cement extravasation were observed in both the PO group (38.1%) and MWA+PO group(19.4%)(χ²=2.38, P=0.12), but none of the patients developed clinical symptoms related to bone cement extravasation. The average cost of surgery was ¥10,480.43 higher in the MWA+PO group than in the PO group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MWA+PO treatment is more effective in relieving patients' local pain, improving local dysfunction, and enhancing quality of life, and can effectively improve target lesion tumor ORR and DCR, but it is also more costly.</p>","PeriodicalId":9479,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Management and Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"1363-1373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S482477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of microwave ablation combined with percutaneous osteoplasty (MWA + PO group) versus percutaneous osteoplasty (PO group) for the treatment of flat bone metastases.

Methods: Patients with flat bone metastases and intractable pain who underwent PO and/or MWA from January 2016 to January 2023 in our hospital were included, with 36 cases in the MWA+PO group and 21 cases in the PO group. Changes in the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and quality of life assessment scale(QOL) were evaluated regularly. Postoperative complications and target lesion tumor treatment responses were also observed.

Results: The VAS and ODI in both the MWA+PO group and the PO group significantly decreased at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively, The VAS and ODI in the MWA+PO group were lower than those in the PO group postoperatively. The QOL in both the MWA+PO group and the PO group significantly increased at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively, with the QOL in the MWA+PO group being higher than that in the PO group postoperatively. According to the mRECIST criteria (target lesion tumor treatment response), the ORR in the MWA+PO group and PO group was 52.8% and 9.5%, respectively, while the DCR was 94.4% and 57.1%, respectively (P <0.001 and<0.001). Different degrees of bone cement extravasation were observed in both the PO group (38.1%) and MWA+PO group(19.4%)(χ²=2.38, P=0.12), but none of the patients developed clinical symptoms related to bone cement extravasation. The average cost of surgery was ¥10,480.43 higher in the MWA+PO group than in the PO group.

Conclusion: The MWA+PO treatment is more effective in relieving patients' local pain, improving local dysfunction, and enhancing quality of life, and can effectively improve target lesion tumor ORR and DCR, but it is also more costly.

微波消融联合经皮骨成形术治疗扁平骨转移瘤的临床疗效。
目的:评价微波消融联合经皮骨膜成形术(MWA+PO组)与经皮骨膜成形术(PO组)治疗扁平骨转移瘤的临床疗效和安全性:纳入2016年1月至2023年1月在我院接受PO和/或MWA治疗的扁平骨转移瘤和难治性疼痛患者,其中MWA+PO组36例,PO组21例。定期评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和生活质量评估量表(QOL)的变化。此外,还观察了术后并发症和靶病灶肿瘤治疗反应:术后1周、1个月和3个月,MWA+PO组和PO组的VAS和ODI均明显下降,MWA+PO组的VAS和ODI均低于PO组。术后 1 周、1 个月和 3 个月时,MWA+PO 组和 PO 组的 QOL 均明显增加,其中 MWA+PO 组术后的 QOL 高于 PO 组。根据mRECIST标准(靶病灶肿瘤治疗反应),MWA+PO组和PO组的ORR分别为52.8%和9.5%,DCR分别为94.4%和57.1%(P 结论:MWA+PO组和PO组的ORR和DCR均高于MWA+PO组:MWA+PO治疗在缓解患者局部疼痛、改善局部功能障碍、提高生活质量方面更有效,能有效提高靶病灶肿瘤ORR和DCR,但费用也更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Management and Research
Cancer Management and Research Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
448
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival, and quality of life for cancer patients. Specific topics covered in the journal include: ◦Epidemiology, detection and screening ◦Cellular research and biomarkers ◦Identification of biotargets and agents with novel mechanisms of action ◦Optimal clinical use of existing anticancer agents, including combination therapies ◦Radiation and surgery ◦Palliative care ◦Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical & epidemiological studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and case series that shed novel insights on a disease or disease subtype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信