Aortic valve function and aortic dimensions in obese and overweight patients with bicuspid aortic valve.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Andrew M Reittinger, Peter N Dean, Michael A McCulloch, Jeffrey Vergales
{"title":"Aortic valve function and aortic dimensions in obese and overweight patients with bicuspid aortic valve.","authors":"Andrew M Reittinger, Peter N Dean, Michael A McCulloch, Jeffrey Vergales","doi":"10.1017/S1047951124026490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common CHD and commonly associated with activity restrictions that may lead to a sedentary lifestyle known to increase obesity risk. It is unknown whether obesity is associated with changes in aortic dimensions or aortic valve function in young people with bicuspid aortic valve. This study investigates whether overweight and obese children with bicuspid aortic valve have worse aortic valve function or increased aortic dimensions compared to healthy weight children with bicuspid aortic valve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single centre retrospective cohort study comprised of patients 5 to 25 years old with a diagnosis of bicuspid aortic valve between 1 January, 2019 and 31 December, 2020. Patients were classified as healthy weight or overweight/obese. Values for aortic dimensions as well as peak and mean aortic valve gradients were obtained from echocardiogram reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 251 patients were analysed. Demographics were similar between groups. When indexed to height, the aortic valve annulus (1.28 ± 0.14 vs. 1.34 ± 0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and sinotubular junctions (1.44 ± 0.21 vs. 1.49 ± 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.038) were larger in the overweight/obese group, with no differences in aortic root or ascending aorta sizes. The obese/overweight group had a higher peak aortic valve gradient (23.03 ± 1.64 mmHg vs. 16.17 ± 1.55 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.003) compared to the healthy weight group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthy weight patients did not have larger aortic dimensions compared to the overweight/obese patients. There was evidence of worsening aortic valve stenosis in overweight/obese patients compared to those at a healthy weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":9435,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in the Young","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in the Young","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951124026490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common CHD and commonly associated with activity restrictions that may lead to a sedentary lifestyle known to increase obesity risk. It is unknown whether obesity is associated with changes in aortic dimensions or aortic valve function in young people with bicuspid aortic valve. This study investigates whether overweight and obese children with bicuspid aortic valve have worse aortic valve function or increased aortic dimensions compared to healthy weight children with bicuspid aortic valve.

Methods: This was a single centre retrospective cohort study comprised of patients 5 to 25 years old with a diagnosis of bicuspid aortic valve between 1 January, 2019 and 31 December, 2020. Patients were classified as healthy weight or overweight/obese. Values for aortic dimensions as well as peak and mean aortic valve gradients were obtained from echocardiogram reports.

Results: About 251 patients were analysed. Demographics were similar between groups. When indexed to height, the aortic valve annulus (1.28 ± 0.14 vs. 1.34 ± 0.15, p = 0.001) and sinotubular junctions (1.44 ± 0.21 vs. 1.49 ± 0.24, p = 0.038) were larger in the overweight/obese group, with no differences in aortic root or ascending aorta sizes. The obese/overweight group had a higher peak aortic valve gradient (23.03 ± 1.64 mmHg vs. 16.17 ± 1.55 mmHg, p = 0.003) compared to the healthy weight group.

Conclusion: Healthy weight patients did not have larger aortic dimensions compared to the overweight/obese patients. There was evidence of worsening aortic valve stenosis in overweight/obese patients compared to those at a healthy weight.

肥胖和超重的主动脉瓣二尖瓣患者的主动脉瓣功能和主动脉尺寸。
导言:主动脉瓣二尖瓣是最常见的先天性心脏病,通常与活动受限有关,活动受限可能导致久坐不动的生活方式,而久坐不动已知会增加肥胖风险。对于患有主动脉瓣二尖瓣的青少年,肥胖是否与主动脉尺寸或主动脉瓣功能的变化有关尚不清楚。本研究调查了患有主动脉瓣二尖瓣的超重和肥胖儿童与体重健康的主动脉瓣二尖瓣儿童相比,主动脉瓣功能是否更差或主动脉尺寸是否增大:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2019年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间确诊为主动脉瓣二尖瓣的5至25岁患者。患者被分为健康体重或超重/肥胖。主动脉尺寸以及主动脉瓣梯度的峰值和平均值均来自超声心动图报告:结果:分析了约 251 名患者。两组患者的人口统计学特征相似。当以身高为指标时,超重/肥胖组的主动脉瓣环(1.28 ± 0.14 vs. 1.34 ± 0.15,p = 0.001)和窦管交界处(1.44 ± 0.21 vs. 1.49 ± 0.24,p = 0.038)更大,主动脉根部或升主动脉的大小没有差异。与健康体重组相比,肥胖/超重组的主动脉瓣峰值梯度更高(23.03 ± 1.64 mmHg vs. 16.17 ± 1.55 mmHg,p = 0.003):结论:与超重/肥胖患者相比,健康体重患者的主动脉尺寸并不大。结论:与体重健康的患者相比,超重/肥胖患者的主动脉瓣狭窄程度有恶化的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology in the Young
Cardiology in the Young 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
715
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology in the Young is devoted to cardiovascular issues affecting the young, and the older patient suffering the sequels of congenital heart disease, or other cardiac diseases acquired in childhood. The journal serves the interests of all professionals concerned with these topics. By design, the journal is international and multidisciplinary in its approach, and members of the editorial board take an active role in the its mission, helping to make it the essential journal in paediatric cardiology. All aspects of paediatric cardiology are covered within the journal. The content includes original articles, brief reports, editorials, reviews, and papers devoted to continuing professional development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信