Stylet-driven Leads or Lumenless Leads for Conduction System Pacing.

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review Pub Date : 2024-09-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.15420/aer.2024.18
Óscar Cano, Jan De Pooter, Francesco Zanon
{"title":"Stylet-driven Leads or Lumenless Leads for Conduction System Pacing.","authors":"Óscar Cano, Jan De Pooter, Francesco Zanon","doi":"10.15420/aer.2024.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stylet-driven leads have been recently introduced for conduction system pacing, while most of the previous experience has been obtained with lumenless leads. Design and structural characteristics of both lead types are significantly different, resulting in different implant techniques and independent learning curves. Lead performance appears to be comparable, whereas data on direct comparison of clinical outcomes are scarce. Currently, there are no specific clinical scenarios favouring the use of one lead type over another and the decision should rely on the individual experience of the implanter.</p>","PeriodicalId":8412,"journal":{"name":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","volume":"13 ","pages":"e14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2024.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stylet-driven leads have been recently introduced for conduction system pacing, while most of the previous experience has been obtained with lumenless leads. Design and structural characteristics of both lead types are significantly different, resulting in different implant techniques and independent learning curves. Lead performance appears to be comparable, whereas data on direct comparison of clinical outcomes are scarce. Currently, there are no specific clinical scenarios favouring the use of one lead type over another and the decision should rely on the individual experience of the implanter.

用于传导系统起搏的血针驱动导联或无腔导联。
最近推出了用于传导系统起搏的 Stylet 驱动导联,而之前的大部分经验都是通过无腔导联获得的。这两种导联的设计和结构特点有很大不同,因此植入技术和学习曲线也各不相同。导联的性能似乎不相上下,但直接比较临床结果的数据却很少。目前,还没有特定的临床情况支持使用一种导联类型而非另一种导联类型,应根据植入者的个人经验做出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信