The state of hand rub dispensers in healthcare settings - a multicenter assessment in 19 German healthcare facilities.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Christiane Herzer, Torsten Berg, Christine Hegemann, Tobias Gebhardt, Heide Niesalla, Christoph Senges
{"title":"The state of hand rub dispensers in healthcare settings - a multicenter assessment in 19 German healthcare facilities.","authors":"Christiane Herzer, Torsten Berg, Christine Hegemann, Tobias Gebhardt, Heide Niesalla, Christoph Senges","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01470-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand hygiene is one of the most important hygiene measures to prevent healthcare-associated infections. Well-functioning hand rub dispensers are the foundation of hand hygiene but are often overlooked in research. As the point of origin for hand hygiene, dispensers not only promote compliance through ease of use, but also strongly influence the amount of hand rub used per disinfection. This work investigates how dispenser types and conditions affect dispensed volumes and usability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 5,014 wall-mounted or point-of-care dispensers was collected from 19 German healthcare facilities during installation of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system, including dispenser type and dispensed hand rub volumes. Of these dispensers, 56.2% were metal dispensers, and the majority (89.5%) were wall-mounted. For one hospital, 946 wall-mounted dispensers were analyzed in detail regarding pump material, damages, functionality, cleanliness, and filling levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dispensed volumes varied across and within dispenser types, ranging from 0.4 mL to 4.4 mL per full actuation, with the largest volumes generally dispensed by plastic dispensers with a preset of 1.0 to 3.0 mL per actuation. In general, most dispensers dispense more hand rub per full actuation than specified by the manufacturer. When different types of dispensers are used within a healthcare facility, vastly different volumes can be dispensed, making reliable and reproducible disinfection difficult for healthcare workers. In the detailed analysis of 946 dispensers, 27.1% had cosmetic defects, reduced performance, or were unusable, with empty disinfectant being the most common reason. Only 19.7% of working dispensers delivered their maximum volume on the first full actuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though several studies addressed the variability in dispensed volumes of hand hygiene dispensers, studies dealing with dispenser types and functionality are lacking, promoting the common but false assumption that different dispensers may be equivalent and interchangeable. Variability in dispensed volumes, coupled with frequent dispenser defects and maintenance issues, can be a major barrier to hand hygiene compliance. To support healthcare workers, more attention should be paid to 'dispenser compliance', selecting dispensers with similar volume ranges and proper maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":"13 1","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01470-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hand hygiene is one of the most important hygiene measures to prevent healthcare-associated infections. Well-functioning hand rub dispensers are the foundation of hand hygiene but are often overlooked in research. As the point of origin for hand hygiene, dispensers not only promote compliance through ease of use, but also strongly influence the amount of hand rub used per disinfection. This work investigates how dispenser types and conditions affect dispensed volumes and usability.

Methods: Data from 5,014 wall-mounted or point-of-care dispensers was collected from 19 German healthcare facilities during installation of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system, including dispenser type and dispensed hand rub volumes. Of these dispensers, 56.2% were metal dispensers, and the majority (89.5%) were wall-mounted. For one hospital, 946 wall-mounted dispensers were analyzed in detail regarding pump material, damages, functionality, cleanliness, and filling levels.

Results: Dispensed volumes varied across and within dispenser types, ranging from 0.4 mL to 4.4 mL per full actuation, with the largest volumes generally dispensed by plastic dispensers with a preset of 1.0 to 3.0 mL per actuation. In general, most dispensers dispense more hand rub per full actuation than specified by the manufacturer. When different types of dispensers are used within a healthcare facility, vastly different volumes can be dispensed, making reliable and reproducible disinfection difficult for healthcare workers. In the detailed analysis of 946 dispensers, 27.1% had cosmetic defects, reduced performance, or were unusable, with empty disinfectant being the most common reason. Only 19.7% of working dispensers delivered their maximum volume on the first full actuation.

Conclusion: Even though several studies addressed the variability in dispensed volumes of hand hygiene dispensers, studies dealing with dispenser types and functionality are lacking, promoting the common but false assumption that different dispensers may be equivalent and interchangeable. Variability in dispensed volumes, coupled with frequent dispenser defects and maintenance issues, can be a major barrier to hand hygiene compliance. To support healthcare workers, more attention should be paid to 'dispenser compliance', selecting dispensers with similar volume ranges and proper maintenance.

医疗机构中擦手纸的使用状况--德国 19 家医疗机构的多中心评估。
背景:手部卫生是预防医疗相关感染的最重要卫生措施之一。功能良好的擦手纸机是手部卫生的基础,但在研究中却经常被忽视。作为手部卫生的起源点,涂抹器不仅能通过使用方便来提高依从性,还能对每次消毒所使用的擦手纸量产生重大影响。这项研究调查了分配器的类型和条件如何影响分配量和可用性:方法:在安装电子手部卫生监控系统期间,从 19 家德国医疗机构收集了 5014 台壁挂式或护理点配药机的数据,包括配药机类型和擦手液用量。在这些分配器中,56.2% 是金属分配器,大部分(89.5%)是壁挂式分配器。我们对一家医院的 946 台壁挂式分配器进行了详细分析,包括泵的材料、损坏情况、功能、清洁度和填充量:不同类型配液器的配液量各不相同,每次完全启动的配液量从 0.4 毫升到 4.4 毫升不等,塑料配液器的配液量最大,每次启动的预设配液量为 1.0 到 3.0 毫升。一般来说,大多数本机在每次完全启动时分配的擦手液都比制造商规定的要多。当医疗机构使用不同类型的分配器时,分配的量可能会有很大差异,从而使医护人员难以进行可靠和可重复的消毒。在对 946 台消毒柜进行的详细分析中,27.1% 的消毒柜存在外观缺陷、性能下降或无法使用,其中最常见的原因是消毒剂用完。只有 19.7% 的消毒液分配器能在第一次完全启动时提供最大容量:结论:尽管有多项研究探讨了手部卫生分配器分配量的变化,但却缺乏对分配器类型和功能的研究,这助长了一种常见但错误的假设,即不同的分配器可能是等同的、可以互换的。配药量的差异,再加上配药机经常出现的缺陷和维护问题,可能会成为影响手卫生依从性的主要障碍。为支持医护人员,应更多地关注 "配药机合规性",选择容量范围相似的配药机并进行适当维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
140
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信