2024 Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Care.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Christian Martin-Gill, P Daniel Patterson, Christopher T Richards, Anjali J Misra, Benjamin T Potts, Rebecca E Cash
{"title":"2024 Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Care.","authors":"Christian Martin-Gill, P Daniel Patterson, Christopher T Richards, Anjali J Misra, Benjamin T Potts, Rebecca E Cash","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2412299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) are widely recognized as valuable tools to aggregate and translate scientific knowledge into clinical care. High-quality EBGs can also serve as important components of dissemination and implementation efforts focused on educating emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians about current evidence-based prehospital clinical care practices and operations. We aimed to perform the third biennial systematic review of prehospital EBGs to identify and assess the quality of prehospital EBGs published since 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Ovid Medline and EMBASE from January 1, 2021, to June 6, 2023, for publications relevant to prehospital care, based on an organized review of the literature, and focused on providing recommendations for clinical care or operations. Included guidelines were appraised using the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) criteria for high-quality guidelines and scored using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 33 new guidelines addressing clinical and operational topics of EMS medicine. The most addressed EMS core content areas were time-life critical conditions (<i>n</i> = 17, 51.5%), special clinical considerations (<i>n</i> = 15, 45%), and injury (<i>n</i> = 12, 36%). Seven (21%) guidelines included all elements of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) criteria for high-quality guidelines, including the full reporting of a systematic review of the evidence. Guideline appraisals by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool demonstrated modest compliance to reporting recommendations and similar overall quality compared to previously identified guidelines (mean overall domain score 67%, SD 12%), with Domain 5 (\"Applicability\") scoring the lowest of the six AGREE II domains (mean score of 53%, SD 13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This updated systematic review identified and appraised recent guidelines addressing prehospital care and identifies important targets for education of EMS personnel. Continued opportunities exist for prehospital guideline developers to include comprehensive evidence-based reporting into guideline development to facilitate widespread implementation of high-quality EBGs in EMS systems and incorporate the best available scientific evidence into initial education and continued competency activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2412299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) are widely recognized as valuable tools to aggregate and translate scientific knowledge into clinical care. High-quality EBGs can also serve as important components of dissemination and implementation efforts focused on educating emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians about current evidence-based prehospital clinical care practices and operations. We aimed to perform the third biennial systematic review of prehospital EBGs to identify and assess the quality of prehospital EBGs published since 2021.

Methods: We systematically searched Ovid Medline and EMBASE from January 1, 2021, to June 6, 2023, for publications relevant to prehospital care, based on an organized review of the literature, and focused on providing recommendations for clinical care or operations. Included guidelines were appraised using the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) criteria for high-quality guidelines and scored using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Tool.

Results: We identified 33 new guidelines addressing clinical and operational topics of EMS medicine. The most addressed EMS core content areas were time-life critical conditions (n = 17, 51.5%), special clinical considerations (n = 15, 45%), and injury (n = 12, 36%). Seven (21%) guidelines included all elements of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) criteria for high-quality guidelines, including the full reporting of a systematic review of the evidence. Guideline appraisals by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool demonstrated modest compliance to reporting recommendations and similar overall quality compared to previously identified guidelines (mean overall domain score 67%, SD 12%), with Domain 5 ("Applicability") scoring the lowest of the six AGREE II domains (mean score of 53%, SD 13%).

Conclusions: This updated systematic review identified and appraised recent guidelines addressing prehospital care and identifies important targets for education of EMS personnel. Continued opportunities exist for prehospital guideline developers to include comprehensive evidence-based reporting into guideline development to facilitate widespread implementation of high-quality EBGs in EMS systems and incorporate the best available scientific evidence into initial education and continued competency activities.

2024 院前护理循证指南系统回顾。
目标:循证指南(EBGs)被广泛认为是汇总科学知识并将其转化为临床护理的重要工具。高质量的 EBGs 还可以作为传播和实施工作的重要组成部分,重点是向急救医疗服务(EMS)临床医生宣传当前的循证院前临床护理实践和操作。我们旨在对院前 EBGs 进行第三次两年一次的系统回顾,以确定和评估自 2021 年以来发布的院前 EBGs 的质量:我们系统地检索了 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 6 日期间 Ovid Medline 和 EMBASE 中与院前护理相关的出版物,这些出版物基于有组织的文献综述,侧重于为临床护理或操作提供建议。我们采用美国国家医学科学院(NAM)的高质量指南标准对纳入的指南进行了评估,并使用研究与评估指南评估(AGREE)II工具进行了评分:结果:我们确定了 33 项新指南,涉及急救医疗的临床和操作主题。涉及最多的急救医疗核心内容领域是时间-生命危急情况(17 项,占 51.5%)、特殊临床注意事项(15 项,占 45%)和损伤(12 项,占 36%)。有 7 份(21%)指南包含了美国国家医学研究院(NAM)高质量指南标准的所有要素,包括对证据进行系统回顾的完整报告。通过研究与评估指南评估(AGREE)II工具对指南进行评估后发现,与之前确定的指南相比,这些指南基本符合报告建议,总体质量相似(平均总体领域得分 67%,SD 12%),而领域 5("适用性")在 AGREE II 的六个领域中得分最低(平均得分 53%,SD 13%):这项最新的系统性综述确定并评估了近期针对院前护理的指南,并确定了急救人员教育的重要目标。院前指南制定者仍有机会将全面的循证报告纳入指南制定中,以促进高质量 EBGs 在急救系统中的广泛实施,并将现有的最佳科学证据纳入初始教育和持续能力活动中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信