Early rapid local impedance drop is associated with acute lesion efficacy during pulmonary vein isolation.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1093/europace/euae260
Péter Perge, Nikola Petrovic, Zoltán Salló, Katalin Piros, Vivien Klaudia Nagy, Pál Ábrahám, István Osztheimer, Béla Merkely, László Gellér, Nándor Szegedi
{"title":"Early rapid local impedance drop is associated with acute lesion efficacy during pulmonary vein isolation.","authors":"Péter Perge, Nikola Petrovic, Zoltán Salló, Katalin Piros, Vivien Klaudia Nagy, Pál Ábrahám, István Osztheimer, Béla Merkely, László Gellér, Nándor Szegedi","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The predictive role of local impedance (LI) drop in lesion formation using a novel contact force sensing ablation catheter was recently described. The purpose of our current study was to assess the temporal characteristics of LI drop during ablation and its correlation with acute lesion efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Point-by-point pulmonary vein isolation was performed. The efficacy of applications was determined by pacing along the circular ablation line and assessing loss of capture. Local impedance, contact force, and catheter position data with high resolution were analysed and compared in successful and unsuccessful applications. Five hundred and fifty-nine successful and 84 unsuccessful applications were analysed. The successful applications showed higher baseline LI (P < 0.001) and larger LI drop during ablation (P < 0.001, for all). In case of unsuccessful applications, after a moderate but significant drop from baseline to the 2 s time point (153 vs. 145 Ω, P < 0.001), LI did not change further (P = 0.99). Contradictorily, in case of successful applications, the LI significantly decreased further (baseline-2 s-10 s: 161-150-141 Ω, P < 0.001 for all). The optimal cut-point for the LI drop indicating unsuccessful application was <9 Ω at the 4-s time point [AUC = 0.73 (0.67-0.76), P < 0.001]. Failing to reach this cut-point predicted unsuccessful applications [OR 3.82 (2.34-6.25); P < 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A rapid and enduring drop of the LI may predict effective lesion formation, while slightly changing or unchanged LI is associated with unsuccessful applications. A moderate LI drop during the first 4 s of radiofrequency application predicts ineffective radiofrequency delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The predictive role of local impedance (LI) drop in lesion formation using a novel contact force sensing ablation catheter was recently described. The purpose of our current study was to assess the temporal characteristics of LI drop during ablation and its correlation with acute lesion efficacy.

Methods and results: Point-by-point pulmonary vein isolation was performed. The efficacy of applications was determined by pacing along the circular ablation line and assessing loss of capture. Local impedance, contact force, and catheter position data with high resolution were analysed and compared in successful and unsuccessful applications. Five hundred and fifty-nine successful and 84 unsuccessful applications were analysed. The successful applications showed higher baseline LI (P < 0.001) and larger LI drop during ablation (P < 0.001, for all). In case of unsuccessful applications, after a moderate but significant drop from baseline to the 2 s time point (153 vs. 145 Ω, P < 0.001), LI did not change further (P = 0.99). Contradictorily, in case of successful applications, the LI significantly decreased further (baseline-2 s-10 s: 161-150-141 Ω, P < 0.001 for all). The optimal cut-point for the LI drop indicating unsuccessful application was <9 Ω at the 4-s time point [AUC = 0.73 (0.67-0.76), P < 0.001]. Failing to reach this cut-point predicted unsuccessful applications [OR 3.82 (2.34-6.25); P < 0.001].

Conclusion: A rapid and enduring drop of the LI may predict effective lesion formation, while slightly changing or unchanged LI is associated with unsuccessful applications. A moderate LI drop during the first 4 s of radiofrequency application predicts ineffective radiofrequency delivery.

肺静脉隔离术中,早期局部阻抗快速下降与急性病变疗效有关。
导言:最近描述了使用新型接触力传感消融导管时局部阻抗下降对病灶形成的预测作用。我们本次研究的目的是评估消融过程中局部阻抗下降的时间特征及其与急性病变疗效的相关性:方法:进行逐点肺静脉隔离。方法:进行逐点肺静脉隔离,通过沿环形消融线起搏和评估捕获损失来确定应用效果。分析并比较了成功和失败应用中的高分辨率局部阻抗、接触力和导管位置数据:结果:分析了 559 次成功应用和 84 次失败应用。结果:对 559 次成功应用和 84 次失败应用进行了分析。成功应用显示出较高的基线局部阻抗(pConclusion):局部阻抗快速而持久的下降可能预示着病灶的有效形成,而局部阻抗的轻微变化或不变与不成功的应用有关。在射频应用的最初 4 秒内,局部阻抗适度下降预示着射频传输效果不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信