Personal responsibility for health in Bulgarian public health law and social legislation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Silviya Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, Florian Steger
{"title":"Personal responsibility for health in Bulgarian public health law and social legislation.","authors":"Silviya Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, Florian Steger","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11624-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the last decades all health systems have experienced a lack of resources. Against this background, the idea of ​​applying personal responsibility of the patient as a criterion for allocation of resources (PRCAR) is gaining increasing attention. Bulgarian healthcare reform has been marked by the implementation of many new strategies, that grounded our scientific interest towards investigating PRCAR in Bulgarian public health law and social legislation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a search of national legal databases 7 documents were selected and subjected to content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prospective responsibility was found in two and retrospective responsibility - in three documents, two of which imposed explicit penalties on the patient. Two documents did not distinguish between the types of patient responsibility. PRCAR was found to be controversial through the prism of the social justice principle. The discussion was conducted through the perspectives of evidence translation of research to law, particularities of social cohesion in Bulgaria, and the interpretation of principles of public health ethics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although PRCAR was traceable in Bulgarian legislation, no supporting arguments for its introduction were deduced. The applicability of PRCAR should be further studied and wider public debate should be initiated.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11624-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the last decades all health systems have experienced a lack of resources. Against this background, the idea of ​​applying personal responsibility of the patient as a criterion for allocation of resources (PRCAR) is gaining increasing attention. Bulgarian healthcare reform has been marked by the implementation of many new strategies, that grounded our scientific interest towards investigating PRCAR in Bulgarian public health law and social legislation.

Methods: Through a search of national legal databases 7 documents were selected and subjected to content analysis.

Results: Prospective responsibility was found in two and retrospective responsibility - in three documents, two of which imposed explicit penalties on the patient. Two documents did not distinguish between the types of patient responsibility. PRCAR was found to be controversial through the prism of the social justice principle. The discussion was conducted through the perspectives of evidence translation of research to law, particularities of social cohesion in Bulgaria, and the interpretation of principles of public health ethics.

Conclusion: Although PRCAR was traceable in Bulgarian legislation, no supporting arguments for its introduction were deduced. The applicability of PRCAR should be further studied and wider public debate should be initiated.

保加利亚公共卫生法和社会立法中的个人健康责任。
背景:在过去的几十年里,所有的医疗系统都经历过资源匮乏的问题。在此背景下,将患者的个人责任作为资源分配标准(PRCAR)的理念日益受到关注。保加利亚医疗改革的特点是实施了许多新战略,这使我们对研究保加利亚公共卫生法和社会立法中的 PRCAR 产生了科学兴趣:通过对国家法律数据库的搜索,我们选择了 7 份文件并对其进行了内容分析:结果:在两份文件中发现了前瞻性责任,在三份文件中发现了追溯性责任,其中两份文件对患者进行了明确的处罚。有两份文件没有区分患者责任的类型。从社会公正原则的角度看,PRCAR 存在争议。讨论是通过将研究证据转化为法律、保加利亚社会凝聚力的特殊性以及对公共卫生伦理原则的解释等角度进行的:尽管在保加利亚的立法中可以找到 PRCAR 的踪迹,但并没有推导出引入 PRCAR 的支持性论据。应进一步研究 PRCAR 的适用性,并发起更广泛的公众辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信