E-Cigarette and Vaping Perspectives: Recommendations for Occupational Health Nurses.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Sheila A Quinn, Kim Olszewski, Debra M Wolf
{"title":"E-Cigarette and Vaping Perspectives: Recommendations for Occupational Health Nurses.","authors":"Sheila A Quinn, Kim Olszewski, Debra M Wolf","doi":"10.1177/21650799241279991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Statistics from the Centers for Disease Control indicate that the use of e-cigarettes, vaping, and other electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are increasing although data on their safety is limited. While most employers ban smoking in the workplace, tobacco-free policies do not always extend specifically to e-cigarette products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IRB approved exploratory, cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate occupational health professionals' (OHPs) knowledge of e-cigarettes, vaping and ENDS and the ability to create change in tobacco-free workplace policies. A 91-item electronic survey was sent via email to 3248 OHPs who were members of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 299 surveys were returned, but only 230 completed the entire survey. Of those who completed the entire survey, those with advanced education had higher attitude toward change summary scores (<i>p</i> = .043) and those with lower years of practicing had low scores for transformational leadership (<i>p</i> = .039). Approximately 40% of individuals did not have or were unsure that a tobacco-free program was in place that included e-cigarettes, but the majority (90%) perceived their organizational leaders as interested in safety changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of respondents understood the health issues inherent in e-cigarettes, were open to implementing policies that included e-cigarettes but needed education and both managerial and employee support to implement policy changes.</p><p><strong>Application to practice: </strong>OHPs are well positioned to be advocates for workplace education, policy development, and worker health promotion for smoking and vaping cessation by leading organizational change.</p>","PeriodicalId":48968,"journal":{"name":"Workplace Health & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"21650799241279991"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workplace Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799241279991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Statistics from the Centers for Disease Control indicate that the use of e-cigarettes, vaping, and other electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are increasing although data on their safety is limited. While most employers ban smoking in the workplace, tobacco-free policies do not always extend specifically to e-cigarette products.

Methods: An IRB approved exploratory, cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate occupational health professionals' (OHPs) knowledge of e-cigarettes, vaping and ENDS and the ability to create change in tobacco-free workplace policies. A 91-item electronic survey was sent via email to 3248 OHPs who were members of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.

Findings: A total of 299 surveys were returned, but only 230 completed the entire survey. Of those who completed the entire survey, those with advanced education had higher attitude toward change summary scores (p = .043) and those with lower years of practicing had low scores for transformational leadership (p = .039). Approximately 40% of individuals did not have or were unsure that a tobacco-free program was in place that included e-cigarettes, but the majority (90%) perceived their organizational leaders as interested in safety changes.

Conclusions: The majority of respondents understood the health issues inherent in e-cigarettes, were open to implementing policies that included e-cigarettes but needed education and both managerial and employee support to implement policy changes.

Application to practice: OHPs are well positioned to be advocates for workplace education, policy development, and worker health promotion for smoking and vaping cessation by leading organizational change.

电子烟和吸食电子烟的观点:对职业健康护士的建议。
背景:美国疾病控制中心的统计数据表明,电子烟、吸食电子烟和其他电子尼古丁递送系统(ENDS)的使用在不断增加,但有关其安全性的数据却很有限。虽然大多数雇主都禁止在工作场所吸烟,但无烟政策并不总是特别适用于电子烟产品:方法:我们开展了一项经 IRB 批准的探索性横断面研究,以调查职业卫生专业人员(OHPs)对电子烟、吸食电子烟和 ENDS 的了解程度以及改变工作场所无烟政策的能力。我们通过电子邮件向3248名美国职业健康护士协会会员的职业健康专业人员发送了一份包含91个项目的电子调查问卷:共收回 299 份调查问卷,但只有 230 人完成了整个调查。在完成整个调查的人中,受过高等教育的人对变革的态度总分较高(p = .043),而从业年限较低的人对变革型领导力的得分较低(p = .039)。约 40% 的人没有或不确定是否实施了包括电子烟在内的无烟计划,但大多数人(90%)认为他们的组织领导对安全变革感兴趣:结论:大多数受访者了解电子烟固有的健康问题,对实施包括电子烟在内的政策持开放态度,但需要教育以及管理者和员工的支持来实施政策变革:通过领导组织变革,职业保健人员完全有能力成为工作场所教育、政策制定和工人健康促进的倡导者,从而戒烟和戒烟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Workplace Health & Safety: Promoting Environments Conducive to Well-Being and Productivity is the official publication of the American Association of Occupational Health Nursing, Inc. (AAOHN). It is a scientific peer-reviewed Journal. Its purpose is to support and promote the practice of occupational and environmental health nurses by providing leading edge research findings and evidence-based clinical practices. It publishes articles that span the range of issues facing occupational and environmental health professionals, including emergency and all-hazard preparedness, health promotion, safety, productivity, environmental health, case management, workers'' compensation, business and leadership, compliance and information management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信