Red and Green LED Light Therapy: A Comparative Study in Androgenetic Alopecia.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Jiratchaya Tantiyavarong, Sasin Charoensuksira, Jitlada Meephansan, Sirashat Hanvivattanakul, Yossawat Rayanasukha, Thitikorn Boonkoom, Kittipong Tantisantisom
{"title":"Red and Green LED Light Therapy: A Comparative Study in Androgenetic Alopecia.","authors":"Jiratchaya Tantiyavarong, Sasin Charoensuksira, Jitlada Meephansan, Sirashat Hanvivattanakul, Yossawat Rayanasukha, Thitikorn Boonkoom, Kittipong Tantisantisom","doi":"10.1111/phpp.13004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) affects both men and women, characterized by progressive hair thinning. While current treatments like minoxidil and finasteride have efficacy limitations and side effects, low-level light therapy (LLLT) using red or near-infrared light has emerged as a promising alternative. Recent animal studies suggest potential benefits from green LED light, though human data are sparse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized an innovative LED helmet emitting red and green LED light on respective halves of the frontal scalp, delivering an energy density of 40 J/cm<sup>2</sup> over 20 min. Clinical photography, physician evaluations on a 7-point scale, patient satisfaction, and measurements of hair density and hair diameter were employed. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, with significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen participants (47.1% male, 52.9% female, average age 46.47 years) demonstrated notable improvements after 6 months of treatment. Red and green LEDs both significantly increased hair diameter, non-vellus hair density, and satisfaction scores. Notably, the red LED therapy resulted in a statistically significant decrease in vellus hair density and achieved a greater increase in hair diameter compared to the green LED therapy. Minimal adverse effects were reported, primarily consisting of tolerable scalp heat and mild redness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both red and green LED therapies effectively enhanced hair growth, increasing density and thickness over 6 months. Red LED demonstrated superior improvements in specific measures. Consequently, both therapies present safe and viable alternatives for the management of AGA, expanding the repertoire of available treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":20123,"journal":{"name":"Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.13004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) affects both men and women, characterized by progressive hair thinning. While current treatments like minoxidil and finasteride have efficacy limitations and side effects, low-level light therapy (LLLT) using red or near-infrared light has emerged as a promising alternative. Recent animal studies suggest potential benefits from green LED light, though human data are sparse.

Methods: This study utilized an innovative LED helmet emitting red and green LED light on respective halves of the frontal scalp, delivering an energy density of 40 J/cm2 over 20 min. Clinical photography, physician evaluations on a 7-point scale, patient satisfaction, and measurements of hair density and hair diameter were employed. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: Seventeen participants (47.1% male, 52.9% female, average age 46.47 years) demonstrated notable improvements after 6 months of treatment. Red and green LEDs both significantly increased hair diameter, non-vellus hair density, and satisfaction scores. Notably, the red LED therapy resulted in a statistically significant decrease in vellus hair density and achieved a greater increase in hair diameter compared to the green LED therapy. Minimal adverse effects were reported, primarily consisting of tolerable scalp heat and mild redness.

Conclusion: Both red and green LED therapies effectively enhanced hair growth, increasing density and thickness over 6 months. Red LED demonstrated superior improvements in specific measures. Consequently, both therapies present safe and viable alternatives for the management of AGA, expanding the repertoire of available treatment options.

红绿 LED 光疗法:雄激素性脱发的比较研究
背景:雄激素性脱发(AGA)对男性和女性都有影响,其特征是头发逐渐稀疏。虽然米诺地尔和非那雄胺等现有治疗方法存在疗效限制和副作用,但使用红光或近红外光的低强度光疗法(LLLT)已成为一种很有前景的替代疗法。最近的动物研究表明,绿色 LED 光具有潜在的益处,但人类数据还很稀少:这项研究使用了一种创新型 LED 头盔,在额头头皮的两半分别发射红色和绿色 LED 光,在 20 分钟内提供 40 焦耳/平方厘米的能量密度。研究采用了临床摄影、医生 7 分制评价、患者满意度以及毛发密度和毛发直径测量结果。数据采用线性混合效应模型进行分析,显著性设定为 p 结果:17 名参与者(47.1% 为男性,52.9% 为女性,平均年龄 46.47 岁)在接受 6 个月的治疗后病情有明显改善。红光和绿光 LED 都明显增加了头发直径、非倒竖毛发密度和满意度评分。值得注意的是,与绿色 LED疗法相比,红色 LED疗法在统计学上明显降低了绒毛密度,并在更大程度上增加了头发直径。不良反应极少,主要是头皮发热和轻微发红:结论:红光和绿光 LED疗法都能有效促进头发生长,在 6 个月内增加头发密度和厚度。红光 LED 在特定指标上的改善效果更佳。因此,这两种疗法都是治疗 AGA 的安全可行的替代疗法,扩大了可供选择的治疗范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is a forum for new information about the direct and distant effects of electromagnetic radiation (ultraviolet, visible and infrared) mediated through skin. The divisions of the editorial board reflect areas of specific interest: aging, carcinogenesis, immunology, instrumentation and optics, lasers, photodynamic therapy, photosensitivity, pigmentation and therapy. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine includes original articles, reviews, communications and editorials. Original articles may include the investigation of experimental or pathological processes in humans or animals in vivo or the investigation of radiation effects in cells or tissues in vitro. Methodology need have no limitation; rather, it should be appropriate to the question addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信