Autoimmune and infectious encephalitis: development of a discriminative tool for early diagnosis and initiation of therapy.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tobias Moser, Joachim Gruber, Eirini Mylonaki, Vincent Böhm, Daniel Schwarzenhofer, Anna R Tröscher, Eva Lenzenweger, Ingomar Krehan, Eva Söllradl, Markus Leitinger, Raimund Helbok, Eugen Trinka, Tim J von Oertzen, Judith N Wagner
{"title":"Autoimmune and infectious encephalitis: development of a discriminative tool for early diagnosis and initiation of therapy.","authors":"Tobias Moser, Joachim Gruber, Eirini Mylonaki, Vincent Böhm, Daniel Schwarzenhofer, Anna R Tröscher, Eva Lenzenweger, Ingomar Krehan, Eva Söllradl, Markus Leitinger, Raimund Helbok, Eugen Trinka, Tim J von Oertzen, Judith N Wagner","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12712-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Encephalitis originates from diverse autoimmune and infectious etiologies. Diagnostic challenges arise due to the spectrum of presentation and the frequent absence of specific biomarkers. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize and differentiate autoimmune encephalitis (AE) from infectious encephalitis (IE) in adults, and disentangle clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study spanning 10 years was conducted across three Austrian tertiary care hospitals. Inclusion criteria comprised adults with probable or definite encephalitis. Demographics, clinical features, technical findings, treatment modalities, and outcomes were collected from the electronic patient files. A follow-up was performed via telephone interviews and clinical visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 149 patients, 17% had AE, 73% IE, and 10% encephalitis of unknown etiology. Significant differences between AE and IE included the prevalence of acute symptomatic seizures (AE: 85% vs. IE: 20%, p < 0.001), fever (8% vs. 72%, p < 0.001), headache (15% vs. 61%, p < 0.001), and focal neurological deficits (56% vs. 23%, p = 0.004), respectively. Paraclinical differences comprised lower CSF pleocytosis in AE compared to IE (median 6 cells/µl vs. 125 cells/µl, p < 0.001). Epileptic discharges on EEG and MRI lesions were more prevalent in AE than IE (50% vs. 14%, p < 0.001; 50% vs. 28%, p = 0.037). The modified Rankin Scale scores at discharge and last follow-up (median duration 2304 days, IQR 1433-3274) indicated favorable outcomes in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This comprehensive analysis provides insights into the epidemiology, clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic aspects and the outcomes of AE and IE in adults. We developed a diagnostic tool that facilitates early differentiation between AE and IE, aiding in timely therapeutic decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12712-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Encephalitis originates from diverse autoimmune and infectious etiologies. Diagnostic challenges arise due to the spectrum of presentation and the frequent absence of specific biomarkers. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize and differentiate autoimmune encephalitis (AE) from infectious encephalitis (IE) in adults, and disentangle clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic differences.

Methods: A cohort study spanning 10 years was conducted across three Austrian tertiary care hospitals. Inclusion criteria comprised adults with probable or definite encephalitis. Demographics, clinical features, technical findings, treatment modalities, and outcomes were collected from the electronic patient files. A follow-up was performed via telephone interviews and clinical visits.

Results: Of 149 patients, 17% had AE, 73% IE, and 10% encephalitis of unknown etiology. Significant differences between AE and IE included the prevalence of acute symptomatic seizures (AE: 85% vs. IE: 20%, p < 0.001), fever (8% vs. 72%, p < 0.001), headache (15% vs. 61%, p < 0.001), and focal neurological deficits (56% vs. 23%, p = 0.004), respectively. Paraclinical differences comprised lower CSF pleocytosis in AE compared to IE (median 6 cells/µl vs. 125 cells/µl, p < 0.001). Epileptic discharges on EEG and MRI lesions were more prevalent in AE than IE (50% vs. 14%, p < 0.001; 50% vs. 28%, p = 0.037). The modified Rankin Scale scores at discharge and last follow-up (median duration 2304 days, IQR 1433-3274) indicated favorable outcomes in both groups.

Conclusion: This comprehensive analysis provides insights into the epidemiology, clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic aspects and the outcomes of AE and IE in adults. We developed a diagnostic tool that facilitates early differentiation between AE and IE, aiding in timely therapeutic decision-making.

自身免疫性脑炎和传染性脑炎:开发用于早期诊断和开始治疗的鉴别工具。
背景:脑炎源于多种自身免疫和感染病因。由于表现形式多种多样,而且经常缺乏特异性生物标志物,因此给诊断带来了挑战。本研究旨在全面描述和区分成人自身免疫性脑炎(AE)和感染性脑炎(IE),并区分临床、辅助临床和治疗上的差异:方法:在奥地利三家三级医院开展了一项为期 10 年的队列研究。纳入标准包括可能或确定患有脑炎的成年人。研究人员从电子病历中收集了患者的人口统计学特征、临床特征、技术检查结果、治疗方式和疗效。通过电话访谈和临床访问进行随访:结果:149 名患者中,17% 患有 AE,73% 患有 IE,10% 患有病因不明的脑炎。AE 和 IE 之间的显著差异包括急性症状发作的发生率(AE:85% 对 IE:20%,P 结论:这一综合分析为我们提供了对脑炎病因的深入了解:这项综合分析提供了有关成人 AE 和 IE 的流行病学、临床、辅助临床和治疗方面以及结果的见解。我们开发了一种诊断工具,有助于及早区分 AE 和 IE,及时做出治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信