Delayed graft function has comparable associations with early outcomes in primary and repeat transplant among deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
David Stoy, Brenda Muth, Brad C Astor, Didier Mandelbrot, Sandesh Parajuli
{"title":"Delayed graft function has comparable associations with early outcomes in primary and repeat transplant among deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients.","authors":"David Stoy, Brenda Muth, Brad C Astor, Didier Mandelbrot, Sandesh Parajuli","doi":"10.1007/s40620-024-02104-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication and is associated with worse outcomes among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). There are various risk factors for DGF including previous transplant. We hypothesized that DGF among KTRs undergoing repeat transplant has a greater impact on outcomes compared to primary KTRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All deceased-donor KTRs between 01/2000 and 12/2020 at our center were included. Recipients were categorized as primary KTR or repeat KTR (any number of previous kidney transplants). Outcomes of interest included acute rejection, death-censored graft failure, and patient mortality within 12 months post-transplant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3137 deceased-donor KTRs were included; 2498(80%) were primary KTRs and 639(20%) were repeat KTRs. The rates of DGF were similar between the groups at 29% and 28%, respectively. Compared to KTRs without DGF, DGF was associated with a greater incidence of death and graft failure in both primary and repeat transplants; however, the risk of rejection was not significantly higher in repeat KTRs (p = 0.72). Comparing primary and repeat KTRs, there were no significant differences in either acute rejection (p-interaction = 0.11), death-censored graft failure (p-interaction = 0.38), or death (p-interaction = 0.37). In subgroup analysis among repeat KTRs with DGF, a repeat transplant with no prior DGF was associated with increased risk for death-censored graft failure and death but not for acute rejection. DGF in the prior transplant was protective against death-censored graft failure (HR: 0.07, 95% CI 0.005-0.98, p = 0.05) (p-interaction = 0.04), but this was not significantly associated with acute rejection or death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DGF is associated with similar detrimental outcomes among primary and repeat KTRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-024-02104-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication and is associated with worse outcomes among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). There are various risk factors for DGF including previous transplant. We hypothesized that DGF among KTRs undergoing repeat transplant has a greater impact on outcomes compared to primary KTRs.

Methods: All deceased-donor KTRs between 01/2000 and 12/2020 at our center were included. Recipients were categorized as primary KTR or repeat KTR (any number of previous kidney transplants). Outcomes of interest included acute rejection, death-censored graft failure, and patient mortality within 12 months post-transplant.

Results: A total of 3137 deceased-donor KTRs were included; 2498(80%) were primary KTRs and 639(20%) were repeat KTRs. The rates of DGF were similar between the groups at 29% and 28%, respectively. Compared to KTRs without DGF, DGF was associated with a greater incidence of death and graft failure in both primary and repeat transplants; however, the risk of rejection was not significantly higher in repeat KTRs (p = 0.72). Comparing primary and repeat KTRs, there were no significant differences in either acute rejection (p-interaction = 0.11), death-censored graft failure (p-interaction = 0.38), or death (p-interaction = 0.37). In subgroup analysis among repeat KTRs with DGF, a repeat transplant with no prior DGF was associated with increased risk for death-censored graft failure and death but not for acute rejection. DGF in the prior transplant was protective against death-censored graft failure (HR: 0.07, 95% CI 0.005-0.98, p = 0.05) (p-interaction = 0.04), but this was not significantly associated with acute rejection or death.

Conclusion: DGF is associated with similar detrimental outcomes among primary and repeat KTRs.

在已故供肾移植受者中,移植功能延迟与初次移植和再次移植的早期预后具有可比性。
背景:移植物功能延迟(DGF)是一种常见的并发症,与肾移植受者(KTR)的不良预后有关。DGF有多种风险因素,包括既往移植。我们假设,与初次接受肾移植的 KTR 相比,再次接受肾移植的 KTR 的 DGF 对预后的影响更大:方法:纳入本中心 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 12 日期间的所有已故供体 KTR。方法:纳入本中心 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 12 日期间的所有死体供肾肾移植手术,受者分为初次肾移植和重复肾移植(之前接受过任意次数的肾移植)。关注的结果包括急性排斥反应、去掉死亡因素的移植失败以及移植后12个月内的患者死亡率:结果:共纳入了3137例死亡供体KTR,其中2498例(80%)为初次KTR,639例(20%)为重复KTR。两组的DGF发生率相似,分别为29%和28%。与无DGF的KTR相比,在初次移植和重复移植中,DGF与更高的死亡和移植物失败发生率相关;但在重复KTR中,发生排斥反应的风险并没有显著增加(P = 0.72)。比较初次和重复 KTR,急性排斥反应(p-交互作用 = 0.11)、死亡校正移植物失败(p-交互作用 = 0.38)或死亡(p-交互作用 = 0.37)均无显著差异。在对伴有DGF的重复KTR进行的亚组分析中,既往无DGF的重复移植与死亡校验移植物失败和死亡风险增加有关,但与急性排斥反应无关。既往移植中的DGF对死亡校验移植物失败具有保护作用(HR:0.07,95% CI 0.005-0.98,p = 0.05)(p-交互作用 = 0.04),但与急性排斥反应或死亡无显著相关性:结论:DGF与初治和复治KTR的不良后果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信