Impact of a Design Thinking Educational Activity on Graduate Students' Knowledge, Confidence, and Perceived Benefits.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Janice Hawkins, John Baaki, Beth Tremblay, Robert J Hawkins
{"title":"Impact of a Design Thinking Educational Activity on Graduate Students' Knowledge, Confidence, and Perceived Benefits.","authors":"Janice Hawkins, John Baaki, Beth Tremblay, Robert J Hawkins","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Design Thinking is gaining recognition as an innovative and creative approach to problem solving. Though nurse leaders need problem solving tools to address health care challenges, Design Thinking concepts are not commonly taught in nursing education. To introduce graduate level nursing students to Design Thinking, we held an educational activity focused on this content as part of required coursework.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose was to describe and compare outcomes of a Design Thinking educational activity on students' perceived knowledge, confidence, and benefits to nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Graduate level nursing students participated in a 3-hour educational activity. After the session, students completed an anonymous 10-item survey of their perceptions of the educational activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students reported increased knowledge and confidence of communication strategies and Design Thinking concepts that would benefit their practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse educators should include Design Thinking teaching and learning strategies in their programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Design Thinking is gaining recognition as an innovative and creative approach to problem solving. Though nurse leaders need problem solving tools to address health care challenges, Design Thinking concepts are not commonly taught in nursing education. To introduce graduate level nursing students to Design Thinking, we held an educational activity focused on this content as part of required coursework.

Purpose: The purpose was to describe and compare outcomes of a Design Thinking educational activity on students' perceived knowledge, confidence, and benefits to nursing practice.

Methods: Graduate level nursing students participated in a 3-hour educational activity. After the session, students completed an anonymous 10-item survey of their perceptions of the educational activity.

Results: Students reported increased knowledge and confidence of communication strategies and Design Thinking concepts that would benefit their practice.

Conclusion: Nurse educators should include Design Thinking teaching and learning strategies in their programs.

设计思维教育活动对研究生的知识、信心和感知收益的影响。
背景:设计思维作为一种解决问题的创新性和创造性方法,正在得到越来越多的认可。虽然护士长需要解决问题的工具来应对医疗保健方面的挑战,但设计思维的概念在护理教育中并不常见。为了向护理专业研究生介绍设计思维,我们举办了一次以该内容为重点的教育活动,作为必修课程的一部分。目的:旨在描述和比较设计思维教育活动对学生认知知识、信心和护理实践益处的影响:方法:护理专业研究生参加了一个 3 小时的教育活动。活动结束后,学生们填写了一份由 10 个项目组成的匿名调查表,以了解他们对教育活动的看法:结果:学生们对交流策略和设计思维概念的了解和信心都有所提高,这将有利于他们的实践:护士教育者应在其课程中加入设计思维教学和学习策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信