Subtyping stage 3 epiretinal membrane: a comprehensive study of ectopic inner foveal layers architecture and its clinical implications.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yanqiao Huang, Qiong Wang, Xiaofang Li, Xiujuan Zhao, Xinhua Huang, Wei Ma, Shanshan Yu, Lin Lu, Xiaoyan Ding, Limei Sun
{"title":"Subtyping stage 3 epiretinal membrane: a comprehensive study of ectopic inner foveal layers architecture and its clinical implications.","authors":"Yanqiao Huang, Qiong Wang, Xiaofang Li, Xiujuan Zhao, Xinhua Huang, Wei Ma, Shanshan Yu, Lin Lu, Xiaoyan Ding, Limei Sun","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2023-324517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the visual function and foveal architecture in patients with stage 3 idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study included 56 eyes of 52 patients with stage 3 iERM. The patients were classified into type A ectopic inner foveal layers (EIFL) and type B EIFL based on the presence of a continuous hyporeflective band. Visual function and foveal microarchitecture were assessed in enrolled eyes. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), metamorphopsia scores, retinal sensitivity and optical coherence tomography (OCT)/OCT angiography features were compared between two subtypes.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The BCVA in type A EIFL and type B EIFL was 0.22 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) (0.15 logMAR, 0.40 logMAR) and 0.53±0.23 logMAR, respectively (p=0.002). Type B EIFL had higher average metamorphopsia scores, especially horizontal metamorphopsia scores, than type A (p=0.013, p=0.007, respectively). Type B EIFL had worse central 2° foveal sensitivity than type A (p=0.034). Type B EIFL had thicker central foveal thickness and EIFL thickness (514.08±73.80 µm vs 444.41±56.57 µm, p=0.001; 159.75±78.30 µm vs 48.44±18.37 µm, p<0.0001; respectively). The foveal avascular zone area of type B EIFL was smaller than that of type A (0.042±0.022 mm<sup>2</sup> vs 0.077±0.039 mm<sup>2</sup>, p<0.0001). The vessel density and flow area of the superficial vascular complex in type B EIFL were larger than those in type A (both p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Type B EIFL demonstrated significantly worse visual function than type A EIFL, along with marked differences in foveal microstructure and microvasculature. Our study complements the current staging of iERM and helps determine the optimal timing of iERM surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-324517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the visual function and foveal architecture in patients with stage 3 idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM).

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study included 56 eyes of 52 patients with stage 3 iERM. The patients were classified into type A ectopic inner foveal layers (EIFL) and type B EIFL based on the presence of a continuous hyporeflective band. Visual function and foveal microarchitecture were assessed in enrolled eyes. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), metamorphopsia scores, retinal sensitivity and optical coherence tomography (OCT)/OCT angiography features were compared between two subtypes.

Result: The BCVA in type A EIFL and type B EIFL was 0.22 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) (0.15 logMAR, 0.40 logMAR) and 0.53±0.23 logMAR, respectively (p=0.002). Type B EIFL had higher average metamorphopsia scores, especially horizontal metamorphopsia scores, than type A (p=0.013, p=0.007, respectively). Type B EIFL had worse central 2° foveal sensitivity than type A (p=0.034). Type B EIFL had thicker central foveal thickness and EIFL thickness (514.08±73.80 µm vs 444.41±56.57 µm, p=0.001; 159.75±78.30 µm vs 48.44±18.37 µm, p<0.0001; respectively). The foveal avascular zone area of type B EIFL was smaller than that of type A (0.042±0.022 mm2 vs 0.077±0.039 mm2, p<0.0001). The vessel density and flow area of the superficial vascular complex in type B EIFL were larger than those in type A (both p=0.001).

Conclusions: Type B EIFL demonstrated significantly worse visual function than type A EIFL, along with marked differences in foveal microstructure and microvasculature. Our study complements the current staging of iERM and helps determine the optimal timing of iERM surgery.

第 3 期视网膜外膜的亚型:异位眼窝内层结构及其临床意义的综合研究。
目的:评估特发性视网膜外膜(iERM)3期患者的视觉功能和眼窝结构:一项横断面观察研究纳入了52名3期特发性视网膜外膜(iERM)患者的56只眼睛。根据是否存在连续的低反射带,将患者分为 A 型异位眼窝内层(EIFL)和 B 型异位眼窝内层(EIFL)。对入选眼睛的视觉功能和眼窝微结构进行了评估。比较了两个亚型的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、变形评分、视网膜灵敏度和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)/OCT血管造影特征:结果:A型EIFL和B型EIFL的BCVA分别为0.22对数最小分辨角(logMAR)(0.15 logMAR,0.40 logMAR)和0.53±0.23 logMAR(P=0.002)。与 A 型相比,B 型 EIFL 的平均变形评分更高,尤其是水平变形评分(分别为 p=0.013 和 p=0.007)。B 型 EIFL 的中央 2° 眼窝灵敏度比 A 型差(p=0.034)。B 型 EIFL 的中心眼窝厚度和 EIFL 厚度较厚(514.08±73.80 µm vs 444.41±56.57 µm,p=0.001;159.75±78.30 µm vs 48.44±18.37 µm,p2 vs 0.077±0.039 mm2,p结论:B 型 EIFL 的视觉功能明显差于 A 型 EIFL,同时眼窝微结构和微血管也存在明显差异。我们的研究补充了目前对 iERM 的分期,有助于确定 iERM 手术的最佳时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信