Influences on ethnic minority women's experiences and access to contraception in the UK: a systematic qualitative evidence synthesis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Ryan James Cory, Rebecca Mawson, Emma Linton, Dalal Y Al-Bazz, Kate Fryer, Richard Ma, Caroline Anne Mitchell
{"title":"Influences on ethnic minority women's experiences and access to contraception in the UK: a systematic qualitative evidence synthesis.","authors":"Ryan James Cory, Rebecca Mawson, Emma Linton, Dalal Y Al-Bazz, Kate Fryer, Richard Ma, Caroline Anne Mitchell","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accessible contraception is critical for promoting the health and well-being of women and their families. In the UK, contraception is free at the point of access, but only 55% of pregnancies are planned, with negative implications for maternal and infant outcomes. In general, women from ethnic minorities use contraceptives less than white women. Barriers to the uptake of contraceptives have been identified, including perceived poor information from healthcare professionals and concerns about side effects. However, most studies do not include representative proportions of women from ethnic minorities. Evidence suggests that ethnic minority (EM) women feel targeted and coerced by healthcare professionals regarding contraception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO via Ovid, CINAHL, and Web of Science was conducted to identify primary qualitative and mixed-methods studies exploring ethnic minority women's experience of contraception in the UK. The data were charted using thematic analysis, using both summary and synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>16 studies met the inclusion criteria, including the perspectives of 717 participants from an ethnic minority. Four overarching themes were developed: contraceptive knowledge, beliefs, family, and services. Similar to women in general, ethnic minority women have concerns about side effects, especially infertility, value the perspectives of their peers and male partners, and express a preference for female healthcare professionals. Novel perspectives included conflicting ideas about the influence of religion and stereotyping of ethnic minority women. Culturally competent consultations and a better understanding of hormonal hesitancy are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accessible contraception is critical for promoting the health and well-being of women and their families. In the UK, contraception is free at the point of access, but only 55% of pregnancies are planned, with negative implications for maternal and infant outcomes. In general, women from ethnic minorities use contraceptives less than white women. Barriers to the uptake of contraceptives have been identified, including perceived poor information from healthcare professionals and concerns about side effects. However, most studies do not include representative proportions of women from ethnic minorities. Evidence suggests that ethnic minority (EM) women feel targeted and coerced by healthcare professionals regarding contraception.

Methods: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO via Ovid, CINAHL, and Web of Science was conducted to identify primary qualitative and mixed-methods studies exploring ethnic minority women's experience of contraception in the UK. The data were charted using thematic analysis, using both summary and synthesis.

Results and conclusions: 16 studies met the inclusion criteria, including the perspectives of 717 participants from an ethnic minority. Four overarching themes were developed: contraceptive knowledge, beliefs, family, and services. Similar to women in general, ethnic minority women have concerns about side effects, especially infertility, value the perspectives of their peers and male partners, and express a preference for female healthcare professionals. Novel perspectives included conflicting ideas about the influence of religion and stereotyping of ethnic minority women. Culturally competent consultations and a better understanding of hormonal hesitancy are essential.

影响英国少数民族妇女避孕经历和机会的因素:系统性定性证据综述。
背景:可获得的避孕药具对促进妇女及其家庭的健康和福祉至关重要。在英国,避孕药具是免费提供的,但只有 55% 的怀孕是有计划的,这对母婴的健康产生了负面影响。一般来说,少数民族妇女使用避孕药具的比例低于白人妇女。研究发现,使用避孕药具的障碍包括认为医疗保健专业人员提供的信息不足以及对副作用的担忧。然而,大多数研究并不包括具有代表性的少数民族妇女。有证据表明,少数民族(EM)妇女在避孕问题上感觉受到了医护人员的针对和胁迫:方法:通过 Ovid、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 对 Medline、Embase 和 PsycINFO 进行了系统检索,以确定探讨英国少数民族妇女避孕经历的主要定性和混合方法研究。采用主题分析法对数据进行了汇总和综合:16 项研究符合纳入标准,包括 717 名少数民族参与者的观点。研究提出了四个重要主题:避孕知识、信仰、家庭和服务。与一般女性类似,少数民族女性也担心副作用,尤其是不孕症,重视同龄人和男性伴侣的观点,并表示更喜欢女性医疗保健专业人员。新颖的观点包括对宗教影响的矛盾看法和对少数民族妇女的刻板印象。符合文化习惯的咨询和更好地理解荷尔蒙犹豫不决至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信