Feasibility, clinical outcomes, and learning curves of robotic-assisted colorectal cancer surgery in a high-volume district general hospital: a cohort study.

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-10 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000002545
Samuel Massias, Bhamini Vadhwana, Arian Arjomandi Rad, James Hollingshead, Vanash Patel
{"title":"Feasibility, clinical outcomes, and learning curves of robotic-assisted colorectal cancer surgery in a high-volume district general hospital: a cohort study.","authors":"Samuel Massias, Bhamini Vadhwana, Arian Arjomandi Rad, James Hollingshead, Vanash Patel","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000002545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is one of the most influential surgical advances with widespread clinical and health-economic benefits. West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust was the first in the UK to simultaneously integrate two CMR Surgical Versius robots. This study aims to investigate clinical outcomes of RAS, explore surgeon learning curves and assess the feasibility of implementation within a district general hospital (DGH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study of 100 consecutive patient data were collected between July 2022 and August 2023, including demographics, operative and clinical variables, and compared with laparoscopic surgery (LS) data from the National Bowel Cancer Audit. Surgeon learning curves were analysed using sequential surgical and console times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the RAS cohort, the median age was 70 (IQR 57-78 years) and 60% were male. Retrieval of a minimum of 12 lymph nodes significantly increased in RAS compared to LS (95% vs. 88%, <i>P</i>=0.05). The negative mesorectal margin rate was similar between RAS and LS (97% vs. 91%, <i>P</i>=0.10), as well as length of stay greater than 5 days (42% vs. 39%, <i>P</i>=0.27). For anterior resections performed by the highest volume surgeon (<i>n</i>=16), surgical time was reduced over 1 year by 35% (304.9-196.9 min), whilst console time increased by 111% (63.0-132.8 min).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key quality performance indicators were either unchanged or improved with RAS. There is potential for improved theatre utilisation and cost-savings with increased RAS. This study demonstrates the feasibility and easy integration of robotic platforms into DGHs, offering wider training opportunities for the next generation of surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"86 10","pages":"5744-5749"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is one of the most influential surgical advances with widespread clinical and health-economic benefits. West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust was the first in the UK to simultaneously integrate two CMR Surgical Versius robots. This study aims to investigate clinical outcomes of RAS, explore surgeon learning curves and assess the feasibility of implementation within a district general hospital (DGH).

Methods: A prospective cohort study of 100 consecutive patient data were collected between July 2022 and August 2023, including demographics, operative and clinical variables, and compared with laparoscopic surgery (LS) data from the National Bowel Cancer Audit. Surgeon learning curves were analysed using sequential surgical and console times.

Results: In the RAS cohort, the median age was 70 (IQR 57-78 years) and 60% were male. Retrieval of a minimum of 12 lymph nodes significantly increased in RAS compared to LS (95% vs. 88%, P=0.05). The negative mesorectal margin rate was similar between RAS and LS (97% vs. 91%, P=0.10), as well as length of stay greater than 5 days (42% vs. 39%, P=0.27). For anterior resections performed by the highest volume surgeon (n=16), surgical time was reduced over 1 year by 35% (304.9-196.9 min), whilst console time increased by 111% (63.0-132.8 min).

Conclusions: Key quality performance indicators were either unchanged or improved with RAS. There is potential for improved theatre utilisation and cost-savings with increased RAS. This study demonstrates the feasibility and easy integration of robotic platforms into DGHs, offering wider training opportunities for the next generation of surgeons.

机器人辅助结直肠癌手术的可行性、临床结果和学习曲线:一项队列研究。
导言:机器人辅助手术(RAS)是最具影响力的外科手术进展之一,具有广泛的临床和健康经济效益。西赫特福德郡教学医院 NHS 信托基金会是英国首家同时整合两台 CMR Surgical Versius 机器人的机构。本研究旨在调查 RAS 的临床效果,探索外科医生的学习曲线,并评估在地区综合医院(DGH)实施的可行性:一项前瞻性队列研究收集了2022年7月至2023年8月期间100名连续患者的数据,包括人口统计学、手术和临床变量,并与国家肠癌审计的腹腔镜手术(LS)数据进行比较。利用连续手术时间和控制台时间对外科医生学习曲线进行了分析:RAS队列的中位年龄为70岁(IQR为57-78岁),60%为男性。与LS相比,RAS中至少12个淋巴结的检索率明显增加(95%对88%,P=0.05)。RAS和LS的直肠间隙阴性率相似(97% vs. 91%,P=0.10),住院时间超过5天的比例也相似(42% vs. 39%,P=0.27)。由手术量最大的外科医生(16人)实施的前路切除术,手术时间在1年内缩短了35%(304.9-196.9分钟),而控制台时间增加了111%(63.0-132.8分钟):结论:使用 RAS 后,关键质量绩效指标要么保持不变,要么有所改善。增加 RAS 有可能提高手术室利用率并节约成本。这项研究证明了机器人平台在DGH中的可行性和易集成性,为下一代外科医生提供了更广泛的培训机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信