G Iacovetti, N Tokunaga, M Peevler, J Ragar, G J Sommer, U Y Schaff
{"title":"A-357 Evaluation of a home kit for lay user collection, centrifugation, and refrigeration of capillary blood specimens","authors":"G Iacovetti, N Tokunaga, M Peevler, J Ragar, G J Sommer, U Y Schaff","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background While solutions enabling at-home self-collection of capillary blood samples are maturing, many analytes require blood separation and controlled shipping temperatures for stable analysis in centralized laboratories. Here we present results of a pilot lay user study evaluating usability and specimen quality of at-home blood collection with centrifugation and refrigerated shipping of capillary serum specimens. Methods N=45 consented subjects were mailed kits including supplies for a capillary blood self-collection using a Tasso+™ device, a Labcorp TrueTherm™ reusable shipper containing a temperature tracker, a Labcorp TrueSpin™ battery-powered centrifuge, written instructions, and a usability survey. Subjects independently followed the instructions for blood collection, separation, and thermal protection and returned the kits to Labcorp via overnight shipping. Received kits were evaluated for correct return, volume of blood collected, volume of serum, visual hemolysis, and temperature throughout shipment. Results Of the n=45 consented subjects, 39 subjects returned the kits, one subject unsuccessfully attempted to collect blood two times, and the remaining five subjects did not return the kits. Primary analysis parameters are outlined in Table 1. Conclusions Untrained subjects were able to collect their own capillary blood samples, process them, and ship them using the investigational home collection kits. While kit return can be a challenge with home collection, the vast majority of subjects were able to return a testable sample. Combining blood separation prior to shipment using the Labcorp TrueSpin centrifuge and temperature control with the reusable Labcorp TrueTherm device successfully protected samples from hemolysis. These results indicate that such kits are a promising at-home blood collection method and may increase test accuracy and menu availability for sensitive analytes.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background While solutions enabling at-home self-collection of capillary blood samples are maturing, many analytes require blood separation and controlled shipping temperatures for stable analysis in centralized laboratories. Here we present results of a pilot lay user study evaluating usability and specimen quality of at-home blood collection with centrifugation and refrigerated shipping of capillary serum specimens. Methods N=45 consented subjects were mailed kits including supplies for a capillary blood self-collection using a Tasso+™ device, a Labcorp TrueTherm™ reusable shipper containing a temperature tracker, a Labcorp TrueSpin™ battery-powered centrifuge, written instructions, and a usability survey. Subjects independently followed the instructions for blood collection, separation, and thermal protection and returned the kits to Labcorp via overnight shipping. Received kits were evaluated for correct return, volume of blood collected, volume of serum, visual hemolysis, and temperature throughout shipment. Results Of the n=45 consented subjects, 39 subjects returned the kits, one subject unsuccessfully attempted to collect blood two times, and the remaining five subjects did not return the kits. Primary analysis parameters are outlined in Table 1. Conclusions Untrained subjects were able to collect their own capillary blood samples, process them, and ship them using the investigational home collection kits. While kit return can be a challenge with home collection, the vast majority of subjects were able to return a testable sample. Combining blood separation prior to shipment using the Labcorp TrueSpin centrifuge and temperature control with the reusable Labcorp TrueTherm device successfully protected samples from hemolysis. These results indicate that such kits are a promising at-home blood collection method and may increase test accuracy and menu availability for sensitive analytes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM).
The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics.
In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology.
The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.