Evaluation of the clinical application value of artificial intelligence in diagnosing head and neck aneurysms.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yi Shen, Chao Zhu, Bingqian Chu, Jian Song, Yayuan Geng, Jianying Li, Bin Liu, Xingwang Wu
{"title":"Evaluation of the clinical application value of artificial intelligence in diagnosing head and neck aneurysms.","authors":"Yi Shen, Chao Zhu, Bingqian Chu, Jian Song, Yayuan Geng, Jianying Li, Bin Liu, Xingwang Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01436-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of a semi-automated artificial intelligence (AI) software program (CerebralDoc<sup>®</sup> system) in aneurysm detection and morphological measurement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 354 cases of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) were retrospectively collected in our hospital. Among them, 280 cases were diagnosed with aneurysms by either digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and CTA (DSA group, n = 102), or CTA-only (non-DSA group, n = 178). The presence or absence of aneurysms, as well as their location and related morphological features determined by AI were evaluated using DSA and radiologist findings. Besides, post-processing image quality from AI and radiologists were also rated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the DSA group, AI achieved a sensitivity of 88.24% and an accuracy of 81.97%, whereas radiologists achieved a sensitivity of 95.10% and an accuracy of 84.43%, using DSA results as the gold standard. The AI in the non-DSA group achieved 81.46% sensitivity and 76.29% accuracy, as per the radiologists' findings. The comparison of position consistency results showed better performance under loose criteria than strict criteria. In terms of morphological characteristics, both the DSA and the non-DSA groups agreed well with the diagnostic results for neck width and maximum diameter, demonstrating excellent ICC reliability exceeding 0.80. The AI-generated images exhibited superior quality compared to the standard software for post-processing, while also demonstrating a significantly reduced processing time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI-based aneurysm detection rate demonstrates a commendable performance, while the extracted morphological parameters exhibit a remarkable consistency with those assessed by radiologists, thereby showcasing significant potential for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01436-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of a semi-automated artificial intelligence (AI) software program (CerebralDoc® system) in aneurysm detection and morphological measurement.

Methods: In this study, 354 cases of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) were retrospectively collected in our hospital. Among them, 280 cases were diagnosed with aneurysms by either digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and CTA (DSA group, n = 102), or CTA-only (non-DSA group, n = 178). The presence or absence of aneurysms, as well as their location and related morphological features determined by AI were evaluated using DSA and radiologist findings. Besides, post-processing image quality from AI and radiologists were also rated and compared.

Results: In the DSA group, AI achieved a sensitivity of 88.24% and an accuracy of 81.97%, whereas radiologists achieved a sensitivity of 95.10% and an accuracy of 84.43%, using DSA results as the gold standard. The AI in the non-DSA group achieved 81.46% sensitivity and 76.29% accuracy, as per the radiologists' findings. The comparison of position consistency results showed better performance under loose criteria than strict criteria. In terms of morphological characteristics, both the DSA and the non-DSA groups agreed well with the diagnostic results for neck width and maximum diameter, demonstrating excellent ICC reliability exceeding 0.80. The AI-generated images exhibited superior quality compared to the standard software for post-processing, while also demonstrating a significantly reduced processing time.

Conclusions: The AI-based aneurysm detection rate demonstrates a commendable performance, while the extracted morphological parameters exhibit a remarkable consistency with those assessed by radiologists, thereby showcasing significant potential for clinical application.

评估人工智能在诊断头颈部动脉瘤中的临床应用价值。
目的评估半自动人工智能(AI)软件程序(CerebralDoc® 系统)在动脉瘤检测和形态测量中的性能:本研究回顾性收集了本院 354 例计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)病例。其中,280 例通过数字减影血管造影(DSA)和 CTA(DSA 组,102 例)或仅 CTA(非 DSA 组,178 例)确诊为动脉瘤。根据 DSA 和放射科医生的检查结果评估动脉瘤的存在与否,以及 AI 确定的动脉瘤位置和相关形态特征。此外,还对人工智能和放射科医生的后处理图像质量进行了评价和比较:以 DSA 结果为金标准,在 DSA 组中,人工智能的灵敏度为 88.24%,准确率为 81.97%,而放射医师的灵敏度为 95.10%,准确率为 84.43%。非 DSA 组的人工智能灵敏度为 81.46%,准确率为 76.29%,与放射科医生的结果一致。位置一致性结果比较显示,宽松标准比严格标准的性能更好。在形态学特征方面,DSA 组和非 DSA 组在颈部宽度和最大直径方面的诊断结果都非常一致,显示出超过 0.80 的出色 ICC 可靠性。与用于后处理的标准软件相比,人工智能生成的图像显示出更高的质量,同时还显著缩短了处理时间:结论:基于人工智能的动脉瘤检测率表现值得称赞,同时提取的形态学参数与放射科医生评估的参数表现出显著的一致性,从而展示了临床应用的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信