Impact of atrial fibrillation on pulmonary embolism hospitalization: Nationwide analysis

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mubarak Hassan Yusuf , Akanimo Anita , Olayiwola Akeem Bolaji , Faridat Moyosore Abdulkarim , Chibuike Daniel Onyejesi , Maryam Yusuf , Utku Ekin , Arham Syed Hazari , Mourad Ismail
{"title":"Impact of atrial fibrillation on pulmonary embolism hospitalization: Nationwide analysis","authors":"Mubarak Hassan Yusuf ,&nbsp;Akanimo Anita ,&nbsp;Olayiwola Akeem Bolaji ,&nbsp;Faridat Moyosore Abdulkarim ,&nbsp;Chibuike Daniel Onyejesi ,&nbsp;Maryam Yusuf ,&nbsp;Utku Ekin ,&nbsp;Arham Syed Hazari ,&nbsp;Mourad Ismail","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of arrythmia affecting approximately 1–2 % of the adult population. Patients with an underlying history of atrial fibrillation have a greater chance of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Likewise, patients with VTE are at increased risk for AF. There has been conflicting evidence on the prognostic impact of AF in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) patients. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to estimate the impact of AF on the clinical outcomes of hospitalization for PE.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The 2016–2021 National Inpatient Sample database was searched for adult patients hospitalized with PE with associated history of AF as the principal discharge diagnosis. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, while the secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), total hospital charge (THC), cardiogenic shock, acute respiratory failure, in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). The outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1,128,269 patients were admitted for PE, 12.4 % of whom had underlying AF. The AF and non-AF cohorts had a mean age of 73.6 years and 61.6 years, respectively. PE patient with AF had significantly higher mortality compared to non-AF patients with PE (6.05 % vs 2.75 %, adjusted odds ratio of 1.67 [95 % CI 1.56–1.79; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001]). The PE with AF cohort had increased odds of cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure requiring intubation, higher average length of stay (5.66 days vs 4.18 days, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and a higher total hospital cost (65,235 vs 50,118, P &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AF was associated with increased inpatient mortality and worse clinical outcomes in hospitalization for acute PE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224001083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of arrythmia affecting approximately 1–2 % of the adult population. Patients with an underlying history of atrial fibrillation have a greater chance of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Likewise, patients with VTE are at increased risk for AF. There has been conflicting evidence on the prognostic impact of AF in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) patients. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to estimate the impact of AF on the clinical outcomes of hospitalization for PE.

Method

The 2016–2021 National Inpatient Sample database was searched for adult patients hospitalized with PE with associated history of AF as the principal discharge diagnosis. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, while the secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), total hospital charge (THC), cardiogenic shock, acute respiratory failure, in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). The outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses.

Results

A total of 1,128,269 patients were admitted for PE, 12.4 % of whom had underlying AF. The AF and non-AF cohorts had a mean age of 73.6 years and 61.6 years, respectively. PE patient with AF had significantly higher mortality compared to non-AF patients with PE (6.05 % vs 2.75 %, adjusted odds ratio of 1.67 [95 % CI 1.56–1.79; p < 0.0001]). The PE with AF cohort had increased odds of cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure requiring intubation, higher average length of stay (5.66 days vs 4.18 days, P < 0.001) and a higher total hospital cost (65,235 vs 50,118, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

AF was associated with increased inpatient mortality and worse clinical outcomes in hospitalization for acute PE.
心房颤动对肺栓塞住院治疗的影响:全国分析
导言 心房颤动(房颤)是最常见的心律失常类型,约占成年人口的 1-2%。有心房颤动潜在病史的患者患静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的几率更大。同样,患有 VTE 的患者发生房颤的风险也会增加。关于急性肺栓塞(PE)患者心房颤动对预后的影响,目前还存在相互矛盾的证据。这项回顾性队列研究旨在估算房颤对 PE 住院临床预后的影响。方法在 2016-2021 年全国住院患者抽样数据库中搜索了因 PE 住院且主要出院诊断为房颤的成年患者。主要结果为住院患者死亡率,次要结果为住院时间(LOS)、住院总费用(THC)、心源性休克、急性呼吸衰竭、院内心脏骤停(IHCA)。结果共有 1,128,269 名 PE 患者入院,其中 12.4% 有潜在房颤。心房颤动和非心房颤动患者的平均年龄分别为 73.6 岁和 61.6 岁。有房颤的 PE 患者死亡率明显高于无房颤的 PE 患者(6.05% vs 2.75%,调整后的几率比为 1.67 [95 % CI 1.56-1.79; p < 0.0001])。有房颤的 PE 患者发生心脏骤停、心源性休克、需要插管的呼吸衰竭的几率增加,平均住院时间延长(5.66 天 vs 4.18 天,P < 0.001),住院总费用增加(65,235 vs 50,118,P < 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信