A psychometric exploration of the specificity of reinforcement sensitivity and social needs

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Morten Christoffersen
{"title":"A psychometric exploration of the specificity of reinforcement sensitivity and social needs","authors":"Morten Christoffersen","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reinforcement sensitivity theory is often used as a larger framework to explore individual differences in reinforcement sensitivity, but a core assumption—that sensitivity is indifferent to the type of reinforcer—has rarely been considered. Similarly, research into loneliness often neglects a key component: social needs. Despite stating that individuals possess varying social needs, appropriate reinforcement questionnaires are lacking. This study aims to explore both issues, by developing a psychometric measure, the Social Reward Sensitivity Questionnaire (SRSQ), while administering Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scale, and measuring extraversion and sensitivity to food reinforcers. Based on a 1003 representative Danish participants, food and social reinforcement sensitivity appear to be distinct yet related sensitivities. The SRSQ was developed using Item Response Theory to be a broad-trait measure without differential item functioning for both biological gender and age. All data and the R code used for statistical analyses are available in the supplementary material.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 112847"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinforcement sensitivity theory is often used as a larger framework to explore individual differences in reinforcement sensitivity, but a core assumption—that sensitivity is indifferent to the type of reinforcer—has rarely been considered. Similarly, research into loneliness often neglects a key component: social needs. Despite stating that individuals possess varying social needs, appropriate reinforcement questionnaires are lacking. This study aims to explore both issues, by developing a psychometric measure, the Social Reward Sensitivity Questionnaire (SRSQ), while administering Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scale, and measuring extraversion and sensitivity to food reinforcers. Based on a 1003 representative Danish participants, food and social reinforcement sensitivity appear to be distinct yet related sensitivities. The SRSQ was developed using Item Response Theory to be a broad-trait measure without differential item functioning for both biological gender and age. All data and the R code used for statistical analyses are available in the supplementary material.
对强化敏感性和社会需求特异性的心理测量学探索
强化敏感性理论经常被用作探索强化敏感性个体差异的更大框架,但其核心假设--敏感性与强化物的类型无关--却很少被考虑。同样,对孤独感的研究往往忽略了一个关键因素:社交需求。尽管研究人员指出个体拥有不同的社交需求,但却缺乏适当的强化问卷。本研究旨在探讨这两个问题,在采用 Carver 和 White(1994 年)的 BIS/BAS 量表、测量外向性和对食物强化物的敏感性的同时,开发一种心理测量方法--社交奖赏敏感性问卷(SRSQ)。根据 1003 名具有代表性的丹麦参与者的调查,食物和社会强化敏感性似乎是两种不同但又相关的敏感性。SRSQ 采用项目反应理论开发,是一种广泛的特质测量,不会因生理性别和年龄而产生项目功能差异。所有数据和用于统计分析的 R 代码见补充材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信