Clinical Translation and Implementation of a Bioartificial Pancreas Therapy: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Perspectives of People With Type 1 Diabetes.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-09-25 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001711
Dide de Jongh, Silke Lapré, Behiye Özcan, Robert Zietse, Eline M Bunnik, Emma K Massey
{"title":"Clinical Translation and Implementation of a Bioartificial Pancreas Therapy: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Perspectives of People With Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Dide de Jongh, Silke Lapré, Behiye Özcan, Robert Zietse, Eline M Bunnik, Emma K Massey","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of a hybrid beta-cell replacement approach, referred to as a personalized, transplantable bioartificial pancreas (BAP), holds promise to treat type 1 diabetes (T1D). This interview study aimed to explore patients' expectations, needs, concerns, and considerations when considering to undergo a BAP transplantation.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted with 24 participants diagnosed with T1D. Data collection stopped once data saturation was reached. Audio recordings of the interviews were transcribed verbatim. The interviews were independently analyzed by 2 researchers. A qualitative content analysis using an inductive approach was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three main themes emerged as follow: (1) hoped-for benefits, (2) concerns and decision-making considerations, and (3) procedural aspects. First, the participants expected benefits across medical, psychological, and social domains. Over these 3 domains, 9 subthemes were identified, including improved clinical outcomes, a cure for diabetes, more headspace, emotional relief, a shift in responsibility, protection of privacy, improved flexibility in daily life, less visible diseases, and improved relationships with others. Second, concerns and considerations about undergoing a BAP transplant comprised adverse events, the functionality of the BAP, the surgery procedure, the biological materials used, the transplant location, and the intrusiveness associated with follow-up care. Finally, procedural considerations included equitable access, patient prioritization, and trust and control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating insights from this study into the clinical development and implementation of the BAP is crucial to ensure alignment of the product and procedures with the needs and expectations of people with T1D.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"10 10","pages":"e1711"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The development of a hybrid beta-cell replacement approach, referred to as a personalized, transplantable bioartificial pancreas (BAP), holds promise to treat type 1 diabetes (T1D). This interview study aimed to explore patients' expectations, needs, concerns, and considerations when considering to undergo a BAP transplantation.

Research design and methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 24 participants diagnosed with T1D. Data collection stopped once data saturation was reached. Audio recordings of the interviews were transcribed verbatim. The interviews were independently analyzed by 2 researchers. A qualitative content analysis using an inductive approach was used.

Results: Three main themes emerged as follow: (1) hoped-for benefits, (2) concerns and decision-making considerations, and (3) procedural aspects. First, the participants expected benefits across medical, psychological, and social domains. Over these 3 domains, 9 subthemes were identified, including improved clinical outcomes, a cure for diabetes, more headspace, emotional relief, a shift in responsibility, protection of privacy, improved flexibility in daily life, less visible diseases, and improved relationships with others. Second, concerns and considerations about undergoing a BAP transplant comprised adverse events, the functionality of the BAP, the surgery procedure, the biological materials used, the transplant location, and the intrusiveness associated with follow-up care. Finally, procedural considerations included equitable access, patient prioritization, and trust and control.

Conclusions: Incorporating insights from this study into the clinical development and implementation of the BAP is crucial to ensure alignment of the product and procedures with the needs and expectations of people with T1D.

生物人工胰腺疗法的临床转化与实施:探索 1 型糖尿病患者观点的定性研究。
背景:被称为个性化可移植生物人工胰腺(BAP)的混合β细胞替代方法的开发有望治疗1型糖尿病(T1D)。这项访谈研究旨在探讨患者在考虑接受生物人工胰腺移植时的期望、需求、顾虑和注意事项:对 24 名确诊为 T1D 的参与者进行了半结构式访谈。一旦数据达到饱和,即停止数据收集。访谈录音被逐字转录。访谈由两名研究人员独立分析。采用归纳法进行定性内容分析:出现了以下三大主题(1) 希望获得的益处,(2) 顾虑和决策考虑,以及 (3) 程序方面。首先,参与者希望在医疗、心理和社会领域获得益处。在这三个领域中,共确定了 9 个次主题,包括改善临床疗效、治愈糖尿病、更多的思考空间、情绪舒缓、责任转移、保护隐私、提高日常生活的灵活性、减少疾病的可见性以及改善与他人的关系。其次,对进行生物活瓣移植的担忧和考虑包括不良事件、生物活瓣的功能、手术过程、使用的生物材料、移植地点以及与后续护理相关的侵入性。最后,程序方面的考虑因素包括公平获取、患者优先权以及信任和控制:将本研究的见解纳入 BAP 的临床开发和实施至关重要,以确保产品和程序符合 T1D 患者的需求和期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信