Utility of mid-upper arm circumference in pediatric malnutrition: An Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition consensus statement using the Delphi method.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Caitlin Miles, Julia Fox, Kimberly Davis, Angela Harris, Christine Kwa, Bridget Little, Arabella Thomas, Boutaina Zemrani
{"title":"Utility of mid-upper arm circumference in pediatric malnutrition: An Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition consensus statement using the Delphi method.","authors":"Caitlin Miles, Julia Fox, Kimberly Davis, Angela Harris, Christine Kwa, Bridget Little, Arabella Thomas, Boutaina Zemrani","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is a simple anthropometric tool used to screen for childhood undernutrition in humanitarian settings or low-income and middle-income countries. However, there is conflicting evidence and a lack of consensus with regard to its diagnostic use in clinical settings or population groups beyond this context. In 2023, a project officer was appointed by the Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (AuSPEN) to lead the development of a consensus review into the use of MUAC in the pediatric clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An AuSPEN appointed multidisciplinary group of informed clinicians used the Delphi method to critically appraise the evidence and develop a series of consensus statements. Delphi surveys were anonymous and distributed electronically. Members were asked to rate their level of agreement with each consensus statement using a 5-point Likert scale. A priori definition of consensus was established as ≥80% responses \"agree\" or \"strongly agree.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three Delphi rounds were required to reach consensus. A total of 18 consensus statements, including rationale, were developed across the topics 'assessment and diagnosis', 'screening and monitoring' and 'clinical settings'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An evidence-based, region-specific consensus approach to the use of MUAC in pediatric malnutrition is a valuable tool for clinicians. MUAC is a straightforward, non-invasive and cost-effective tool, and may provide an advantage over traditional anthropometric tools in some clinical settings. There are limitations to the utility of MUAC and this consensus paper provides an empirical summary of advantages and limitations as they apply to the screening, assessment, diagnosis, and monitoring of pediatric malnutrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is a simple anthropometric tool used to screen for childhood undernutrition in humanitarian settings or low-income and middle-income countries. However, there is conflicting evidence and a lack of consensus with regard to its diagnostic use in clinical settings or population groups beyond this context. In 2023, a project officer was appointed by the Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (AuSPEN) to lead the development of a consensus review into the use of MUAC in the pediatric clinical setting.

Methods: An AuSPEN appointed multidisciplinary group of informed clinicians used the Delphi method to critically appraise the evidence and develop a series of consensus statements. Delphi surveys were anonymous and distributed electronically. Members were asked to rate their level of agreement with each consensus statement using a 5-point Likert scale. A priori definition of consensus was established as ≥80% responses "agree" or "strongly agree."

Results: Three Delphi rounds were required to reach consensus. A total of 18 consensus statements, including rationale, were developed across the topics 'assessment and diagnosis', 'screening and monitoring' and 'clinical settings'.

Conclusion: An evidence-based, region-specific consensus approach to the use of MUAC in pediatric malnutrition is a valuable tool for clinicians. MUAC is a straightforward, non-invasive and cost-effective tool, and may provide an advantage over traditional anthropometric tools in some clinical settings. There are limitations to the utility of MUAC and this consensus paper provides an empirical summary of advantages and limitations as they apply to the screening, assessment, diagnosis, and monitoring of pediatric malnutrition.

中上臂围在小儿营养不良中的实用性:澳大利亚肠外和肠内营养学会采用德尔菲法达成的共识声明。
背景:中上臂围(MUAC)是一种简单的人体测量工具,用于在人道主义环境或中低收入国家筛查儿童营养不良。然而,关于该工具在临床环境或其他人群中的诊断用途,存在相互矛盾的证据,也缺乏共识。2023 年,澳大拉西亚肠外和肠内营养学会(AuSPEN)任命了一名项目官员,负责牵头就 MUAC 在儿科临床环境中的应用开展共识审查:由 AuSPEN 指定的知情临床医生组成的多学科小组采用德尔菲法对证据进行了严格评估,并制定了一系列共识声明。德尔菲调查以电子方式匿名发布。小组成员被要求使用 5 点李克特量表来评定他们对每项共识声明的同意程度。共识的先验定义为≥80%的回答为 "同意 "或 "非常同意":需要经过三轮德尔菲讨论才能达成共识。在 "评估与诊断"、"筛查与监测 "和 "临床环境 "三个主题下,共达成了 18 项共识声明(包括理由):以证据为基础、针对特定地区的共识方法是临床医生在儿科营养不良中使用 MUAC 的重要工具。MUAC 是一种简单、非侵入性且具有成本效益的工具,在某些临床环境中可能比传统的人体测量工具更具优势。MUAC 的实用性有其局限性,本共识文件对适用于筛查、评估、诊断和监测儿科营养不良的优势和局限性进行了经验性总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信