Interhospital variability of risk-adjusted mortality rates and associated structural factors in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: England and Wales population-level analysis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Alexander R Darbyshire, Stuart J Mercer, Sonal Arora, Philip H Pucher
{"title":"Interhospital variability of risk-adjusted mortality rates and associated structural factors in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: England and Wales population-level analysis.","authors":"Alexander R Darbyshire, Stuart J Mercer, Sonal Arora, Philip H Pucher","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency surgical admissions represent the majority of general surgical workload. Interhospital variations in outcomes are well recognized. This analysis of a national laparotomy data set compared the best- and worst-performing hospitals according to 30-day mortality and examined differences in process and structural factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed using data from the England and Wales National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (December 2013 to November 2020). The data set was divided into quintiles based on the risk-adjusted mortality calculated using the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit score risk prediction model. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Hospital-level factors were compared across all five quintiles, and logistic regression analysis was conducted comparing the lowest with the highest risk-adjusted mortality quintiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Risk-adjusted 30-day mortality in the poorest performing quintile was significantly higher than that of the best performing (11.4% vs. 6.6%) despite equivalent predicted mortality (9.4% vs. 9.7%). The best-performing quintile was more likely to be a tertiary surgical (49.5% vs. 37.1%, p < 0.001) or medical school-affiliated center (26.4% vs. 18.0%, p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, the strongest associations were for surgery performed in a tertiary center (odds ratio, 0.690 [95% confidence interval, 0.652-0.731], p < 0.001) and if surgery was performed by a gastrointestinal specialist (0.655 [0.626-0.685], p < 0.001). Smaller differences were seen for postoperative intensive care stay (0.848 [0.808-0.890], p < 0.001) and consultant anesthetist involvement (0.900 [0.837-0.967], p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study has identified significant variability in postoperative mortality across hospitals. Structural factors such as gastrointestinal specialist delivered emergency laparotomy and tertiary surgical center status appear to be associated with improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"295-301"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004455","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency surgical admissions represent the majority of general surgical workload. Interhospital variations in outcomes are well recognized. This analysis of a national laparotomy data set compared the best- and worst-performing hospitals according to 30-day mortality and examined differences in process and structural factors.

Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed using data from the England and Wales National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (December 2013 to November 2020). The data set was divided into quintiles based on the risk-adjusted mortality calculated using the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit score risk prediction model. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Hospital-level factors were compared across all five quintiles, and logistic regression analysis was conducted comparing the lowest with the highest risk-adjusted mortality quintiles.

Results: Risk-adjusted 30-day mortality in the poorest performing quintile was significantly higher than that of the best performing (11.4% vs. 6.6%) despite equivalent predicted mortality (9.4% vs. 9.7%). The best-performing quintile was more likely to be a tertiary surgical (49.5% vs. 37.1%, p < 0.001) or medical school-affiliated center (26.4% vs. 18.0%, p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, the strongest associations were for surgery performed in a tertiary center (odds ratio, 0.690 [95% confidence interval, 0.652-0.731], p < 0.001) and if surgery was performed by a gastrointestinal specialist (0.655 [0.626-0.685], p < 0.001). Smaller differences were seen for postoperative intensive care stay (0.848 [0.808-0.890], p < 0.001) and consultant anesthetist involvement (0.900 [0.837-0.967], p = 0.004).

Discussion: This study has identified significant variability in postoperative mortality across hospitals. Structural factors such as gastrointestinal specialist delivered emergency laparotomy and tertiary surgical center status appear to be associated with improved outcomes.

Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

急诊开腹手术患者风险调整后死亡率的医院间差异及相关结构因素:英格兰和威尔士人群水平分析。
背景:急诊入院手术占普通外科工作量的绝大部分。医院间的结果差异已得到公认。这项对全国开腹手术数据集的分析根据 30 天死亡率对表现最好和最差的医院进行了比较,并考察了流程和结构因素的差异:利用英格兰和威尔士全国急诊腹腔手术审计(2013 年 12 月至 2020 年 11 月)的数据进行了一项回顾性多中心队列研究。数据集根据使用国家急诊腹腔手术审计评分风险预测模型计算的风险调整死亡率分为五等分。主要结果是 30 天死亡率。对所有五个五分位数的医院因素进行了比较,并对风险调整后死亡率最低的五分位数与最高的五分位数进行了逻辑回归分析:结果:尽管预测死亡率相当(9.4% 对 9.7%),但表现最差的五分位数经风险调整后的 30 天死亡率明显高于表现最好的五分位数(11.4% 对 6.6%)。表现最好的五分位数更有可能是三级外科中心(49.5% 对 37.1%,p < 0.001)或医学院附属中心(26.4% 对 18.0%,p < 0.001)。在逻辑回归分析中,在三级中心进行手术(几率比为 0.690 [95%置信区间,0.652-0.731],p < 0.001)和由胃肠道专家进行手术(0.655 [0.626-0.685],p < 0.001)的关联性最强。术后重症监护时间(0.848 [0.808-0.890],p < 0.001)和麻醉师顾问参与(0.900 [0.837-0.967],p = 0.004)的差异较小:讨论:本研究发现了不同医院术后死亡率的显著差异。讨论:该研究发现,不同医院的术后死亡率存在显著差异。结构性因素,如胃肠道专家提供紧急开腹手术和三级外科中心地位,似乎与预后改善有关:证据级别:原始研究文章;二级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信