Classification of Complete-Arch Implant Scanning Techniques Recorded by Using Intraoral Scanners.

IF 3.2 3区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1111/jerd.13322

Marta Revilla-León, Miguel Gómez-Polo, Vygandas Rutkunas, Panagiotis Ntovas, John C Kois

{"title":"Classification of Complete-Arch Implant Scanning Techniques Recorded by Using Intraoral Scanners.","authors":"Marta Revilla-León, Miguel Gómez-Polo, Vygandas Rutkunas, Panagiotis Ntovas, John C Kois","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To classify the complete-arch implant scanning techniques recorded by using intraoral scanners (IOSs).Overview: Different implant scanning techniques have been described for recording complete-arch implant scans by using IOSs. However, dental literature lacks on a classification of these implant scanning techniques. Implant scanning techniques aim is to record the 3-dimensional position of the implants being scanned, while implant scanning workflows require additional scans to record all the information needed for designing an implant prosthesis. This additional information includes soft tissue information, tooth position, antagonist arch, and maxillomandibular relationship.Conclusions: There are five complete-arch implant scanning techniques captured by using IOSs: non-splinting, non-calibrated splinting, calibrated implant scan bodies, calibrated frameworks, and reverse impression methods. The digital workflow varies depending on the implant scanning technique selected.Clinical significance: The understanding of the varying implant scanning techniques and the main differences among them may ease the decision criteria for recording digital implant scans by using intraoral scanners.","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To classify the complete-arch implant scanning techniques recorded by using intraoral scanners (IOSs).

Overview: Different implant scanning techniques have been described for recording complete-arch implant scans by using IOSs. However, dental literature lacks on a classification of these implant scanning techniques. Implant scanning techniques aim is to record the 3-dimensional position of the implants being scanned, while implant scanning workflows require additional scans to record all the information needed for designing an implant prosthesis. This additional information includes soft tissue information, tooth position, antagonist arch, and maxillomandibular relationship.

Conclusions: There are five complete-arch implant scanning techniques captured by using IOSs: non-splinting, non-calibrated splinting, calibrated implant scan bodies, calibrated frameworks, and reverse impression methods. The digital workflow varies depending on the implant scanning technique selected.

Clinical significance: The understanding of the varying implant scanning techniques and the main differences among them may ease the decision criteria for recording digital implant scans by using intraoral scanners.

查看原文本刊更多论文

使用口内扫描仪记录的全拱种植体扫描技术分类。

目的：对使用口内扫描仪（IOS）记录的全牙槽骨种植体扫描技术进行分类：对使用口内扫描仪（IOS）记录的全牙弓种植体扫描技术进行分类：使用口内扫描仪记录全牙弓种植体扫描时，需要使用不同的种植体扫描技术。然而，牙科文献缺乏对这些种植体扫描技术的分类。种植体扫描技术的目的是记录被扫描种植体的三维位置，而种植体扫描工作流程需要额外的扫描来记录设计种植修复体所需的所有信息。这些附加信息包括软组织信息、牙齿位置、拮抗弓和上下颌关系：使用 IOS 采集的全牙弓种植体扫描技术有五种：非夹板、非校准夹板、校准种植体扫描体、校准框架和反向印模法。根据所选种植体扫描技术的不同，数字化工作流程也有所不同：临床意义：了解不同的种植体扫描技术以及它们之间的主要区别，可以简化使用口内扫描仪记录数字化种植体扫描的决策标准。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

6.20%

发文量

124

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics