Pharmacist-Led Video Consultation to Identify and Mitigate Drug Interactions Among Patients Initiating Oral Anticancer Drugs.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Morgan R L Lichtenstein, Peter Campbell, Rohit Raghunathan, Melissa Beauchemin, Elena B Elkin, Katherine D Crew, Melissa Accordino, Cindy Ippoliti, Michelle Hwang, Rachel Abramova, Erik Harden, Paige Kelly, Nicole Collins, Khadija Faheem, Jason D Wright, Dawn L Hershman
{"title":"Pharmacist-Led Video Consultation to Identify and Mitigate Drug Interactions Among Patients Initiating Oral Anticancer Drugs.","authors":"Morgan R L Lichtenstein, Peter Campbell, Rohit Raghunathan, Melissa Beauchemin, Elena B Elkin, Katherine D Crew, Melissa Accordino, Cindy Ippoliti, Michelle Hwang, Rachel Abramova, Erik Harden, Paige Kelly, Nicole Collins, Khadija Faheem, Jason D Wright, Dawn L Hershman","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The past decade has seen an increase in oral anticancer drug (OACD) approvals. Polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) likely contribute to OACD toxicity. We assessed a one-time pharmacist-led video consultation to identify DDIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-arm telehealth intervention of a one-time 30-minute pharmacist-led video consultation among patients initiating OACDs. The visit focused on identifying polypharmacy and DDIs. Feasibility was defined as ≥50% completion of all study interventions. We determined the prevalence, characteristics, and severity of OACD-related potential DDIs. We also assessed the prevalence of medication list inaccuracies, polypharmacy, patient satisfaction, and patient perception of intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 58 eligible patients, 43 (74%) completed the intervention and 33 (57%) completed all evaluations. Median medication per patient was nine (range 4-21), and 98% of patients had at least five prescriptions. The median number of medication list errors was two (range 0-16), with at least one error for 76% and >1 for 52%. Pharmacists identified OACD-related interactions in 18 cases (42%), including change in drug metabolism (eight), elimination (one), and absorption (three). Interactions were classified as Lexicomp categories C (13), D (five), or X (one) requiring close monitoring or a change in treatment. All patients expressed high satisfaction with the intervention and agreed or completely agreed that it was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Polypharmacy, medication list errors, and DDIs are prevalent among patients initiating OACDs. A one-time remote pharmacist-led video consultation can address OACD-related DDIs, which may decrease medication complexity and improve adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400326"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The past decade has seen an increase in oral anticancer drug (OACD) approvals. Polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) likely contribute to OACD toxicity. We assessed a one-time pharmacist-led video consultation to identify DDIs.

Methods: We conducted a single-arm telehealth intervention of a one-time 30-minute pharmacist-led video consultation among patients initiating OACDs. The visit focused on identifying polypharmacy and DDIs. Feasibility was defined as ≥50% completion of all study interventions. We determined the prevalence, characteristics, and severity of OACD-related potential DDIs. We also assessed the prevalence of medication list inaccuracies, polypharmacy, patient satisfaction, and patient perception of intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.

Results: Of 58 eligible patients, 43 (74%) completed the intervention and 33 (57%) completed all evaluations. Median medication per patient was nine (range 4-21), and 98% of patients had at least five prescriptions. The median number of medication list errors was two (range 0-16), with at least one error for 76% and >1 for 52%. Pharmacists identified OACD-related interactions in 18 cases (42%), including change in drug metabolism (eight), elimination (one), and absorption (three). Interactions were classified as Lexicomp categories C (13), D (five), or X (one) requiring close monitoring or a change in treatment. All patients expressed high satisfaction with the intervention and agreed or completely agreed that it was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.

Conclusion: Polypharmacy, medication list errors, and DDIs are prevalent among patients initiating OACDs. A one-time remote pharmacist-led video consultation can address OACD-related DDIs, which may decrease medication complexity and improve adherence.

药剂师指导的视频咨询可识别和减轻口服抗癌药物患者的药物相互作用。
目的:过去十年中,口服抗癌药(OACD)的批准数量不断增加。多重用药和药物间相互作用(DDIs)可能会导致口服抗癌药的毒性。我们对药剂师指导的一次性视频咨询进行了评估,以确定 DDIs:我们对开始使用 OACD 的患者进行了单臂远程医疗干预,即由药剂师指导的一次性 30 分钟视频会诊。访问的重点是识别多药合用和 DDI。可行性定义为所有研究干预的完成率≥50%。我们确定了与 OACD 相关的潜在 DDI 的发生率、特征和严重程度。我们还评估了用药清单不准确、多药并用、患者满意度以及患者对干预的可接受性、适当性和可行性的看法:在 58 名符合条件的患者中,43 人(74%)完成了干预,33 人(57%)完成了所有评估。每位患者的用药中位数为 9 种(4-21 种不等),98% 的患者至少有 5 种处方。用药清单错误的中位数为 2 个(范围 0-16),76% 的患者至少有 1 个错误,52% 的患者超过 1 个错误。药剂师发现了 18 例(42%)与 OACD 相关的相互作用,包括药物代谢变化(8 例)、消除(1 例)和吸收(3 例)。相互作用被归类为 Lexicomp C 类(13 例)、D 类(5 例)或 X 类(1 例),需要密切监测或改变治疗方法。所有患者都对干预措施表示非常满意,并同意或完全同意干预措施是可接受的、适当的和可行的:结论:在开始使用 OACD 的患者中,普遍存在着多重用药、用药清单错误和 DDIs 等问题。由药剂师指导的一次性远程视频会诊可以解决与 OACD 相关的 DDI 问题,从而降低用药复杂性并提高依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信