Risk factors for unclear margin in cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyp.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002845
Ryosuke Ikeda, Hiroaki Kaneko, Hiroki Sato, Hideyuki Anan, Yuichi Suzuki, Aya Ikeda, Yoshihiro Goda, Soichiro Sue, Kuniyasu Irie, Shin Maeda
{"title":"Risk factors for unclear margin in cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyp.","authors":"Ryosuke Ikeda, Hiroaki Kaneko, Hiroki Sato, Hideyuki Anan, Yuichi Suzuki, Aya Ikeda, Yoshihiro Goda, Soichiro Sue, Kuniyasu Irie, Shin Maeda","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a common, simple, and safe procedure; however, it has a high rate of unclear margins. We analyzed the risk factors for unclear margins of colorectal polyp.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated colorectal polyps treated with CSP between July 2021 and July 2022, excluding those that could not be retrieved or pathologically nonneoplastic and hyperplastic polyps without margin evaluation. The clinicopathological features and risk factors for unclear margins were analyzed. Furthermore, the polyps were divided into two groups: those resected by experts and those resected by trainees. A 1 : 1 propensity score matching was performed. After matching, the risk factors for unclear margins in each group were analyzed as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 237 patients with 572 polyps; the margins were negative in 58.6% (negative group) and unclear in 41.4% (unclear group). The unclear margin was significantly higher at straddling folds ( P  = 0.0001), flexure points ( P  = 0.005), and in the procedures performed by trainees ( P  < 0.0001). Altogether, 198 propensity score matched pairs were explored for secondary outcomes. There were no significant differences in risk factors for unclear margins in the expert group, while in the trainee group, the unclear margin was significantly higher at the straddling folds ( P  = 0.0004) and flexure points ( P  = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated that straddling folds, flexure points, and procedures performed by the trainees were significant risk factors for unclear margins, and we hypothesized that the rate of unclear margins will reduce as the trainees accumulate experience at difficult sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a common, simple, and safe procedure; however, it has a high rate of unclear margins. We analyzed the risk factors for unclear margins of colorectal polyp.

Methods: We retrospectively investigated colorectal polyps treated with CSP between July 2021 and July 2022, excluding those that could not be retrieved or pathologically nonneoplastic and hyperplastic polyps without margin evaluation. The clinicopathological features and risk factors for unclear margins were analyzed. Furthermore, the polyps were divided into two groups: those resected by experts and those resected by trainees. A 1 : 1 propensity score matching was performed. After matching, the risk factors for unclear margins in each group were analyzed as secondary outcomes.

Results: We analyzed 237 patients with 572 polyps; the margins were negative in 58.6% (negative group) and unclear in 41.4% (unclear group). The unclear margin was significantly higher at straddling folds ( P  = 0.0001), flexure points ( P  = 0.005), and in the procedures performed by trainees ( P  < 0.0001). Altogether, 198 propensity score matched pairs were explored for secondary outcomes. There were no significant differences in risk factors for unclear margins in the expert group, while in the trainee group, the unclear margin was significantly higher at the straddling folds ( P  = 0.0004) and flexure points ( P  = 0.005).

Conclusions: We demonstrated that straddling folds, flexure points, and procedures performed by the trainees were significant risk factors for unclear margins, and we hypothesized that the rate of unclear margins will reduce as the trainees accumulate experience at difficult sites.

大肠息肉冷套管息肉切除术边缘不清晰的风险因素。
目的:冷套管息肉切除术(CSP)是一种常见、简单且安全的手术,但其边缘不清的比例很高。我们分析了大肠息肉边缘不清的风险因素:我们回顾性调查了 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 7 月间接受 CSP 治疗的结直肠息肉,排除了无法取材或未经边缘评估的病理非肿瘤性息肉和增生性息肉。分析了边缘不清的临床病理特征和风险因素。此外,息肉被分为两组:专家切除的息肉和学员切除的息肉。进行了 1 : 1 倾向评分匹配。匹配后,作为次要结果分析了各组中边缘不清的风险因素:我们对 237 名患者的 572 个息肉进行了分析;58.6%(阴性组)的息肉边缘为阴性,41.4%(不清晰组)的息肉边缘不清晰。在跨皱襞(P = 0.0001)、屈曲点(P = 0.005)和由受训者实施的手术中,边缘不清的比例明显较高(P < 0.0001)。共有 198 对倾向得分匹配对进行了次要结果研究。在专家组中,边缘不清的风险因素没有明显差异,而在受训者组中,跨折处(P = 0.0004)和屈曲点(P = 0.005)的边缘不清率明显更高:我们证明了跨皱襞、屈曲点和学员实施的手术是导致边缘不清的重要风险因素,并假设随着学员在困难部位积累经验,边缘不清的比例会降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信