Current Endodontic Practices among Romanian Dental Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cezar Tiberiu Diaconu, Lelia Mihaela Gheorghiță, Anca Elena Diaconu, Mihaela Jana Țuculină, Alexandru Gliga, Carlo Gaeta, Simone Grandini, Iulia Roxana Marinescu, Marina Olimpia Amărăscu, Oana Andreea Diaconu
{"title":"Current Endodontic Practices among Romanian Dental Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Cezar Tiberiu Diaconu, Lelia Mihaela Gheorghiță, Anca Elena Diaconu, Mihaela Jana Țuculină, Alexandru Gliga, Carlo Gaeta, Simone Grandini, Iulia Roxana Marinescu, Marina Olimpia Amărăscu, Oana Andreea Diaconu","doi":"10.3390/dj12090283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Root canal therapy (RCT) is usually performed in Romania by general dentists (GDPs) because they are more readily available and more reasonably priced than endodontists. Concerns have been raised about the quality of RCTs performed by GDPs, possibly due to insufficient equipment or knowledge; therefore, this study aims to investigate current endodontic practices in Romania. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted via a questionnaire distributed to 400 randomly selected Romanian dentists, with 285 fully validated completed responses (71.25% response rate). Respondents were grouped by speciality, and statistical analysis, including cross-tabulation and the χ<sup>2</sup> (chi-square) test, was used, with a significance level set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 for all tests. Results: Significant differences were found in the use of magnification, rubber dam, sodium hypochlorite concentration, and bioceramics (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in preferences for measuring working length (<i>p</i> = 0.166) or rotary instrument motion (<i>p</i> = 0.289). Approximately 6% of the respondents used laser technology with no significant difference across specialities (<i>p</i> = 0.571). Additionally, 77.9% preferred using sodium hypochlorite, with no significant difference between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.006) regarding concentration. <i>Conclusions</i>: Most participants, including GDPs, use modern equipment and techniques during RCT, indicating their awareness and competence in current endodontic practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11431326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12090283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Root canal therapy (RCT) is usually performed in Romania by general dentists (GDPs) because they are more readily available and more reasonably priced than endodontists. Concerns have been raised about the quality of RCTs performed by GDPs, possibly due to insufficient equipment or knowledge; therefore, this study aims to investigate current endodontic practices in Romania. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted via a questionnaire distributed to 400 randomly selected Romanian dentists, with 285 fully validated completed responses (71.25% response rate). Respondents were grouped by speciality, and statistical analysis, including cross-tabulation and the χ2 (chi-square) test, was used, with a significance level set at p ≤ 0.05 for all tests. Results: Significant differences were found in the use of magnification, rubber dam, sodium hypochlorite concentration, and bioceramics (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in preferences for measuring working length (p = 0.166) or rotary instrument motion (p = 0.289). Approximately 6% of the respondents used laser technology with no significant difference across specialities (p = 0.571). Additionally, 77.9% preferred using sodium hypochlorite, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.006) regarding concentration. Conclusions: Most participants, including GDPs, use modern equipment and techniques during RCT, indicating their awareness and competence in current endodontic practices.

罗马尼亚牙科医生目前的牙髓治疗实践:一项横断面研究。
在罗马尼亚,根管治疗 (RCT) 通常由普通牙医 (GDP) 来完成,因为他们比根管治疗医生更容易找到,价格也更合理。可能由于设备或知识不足,人们对普通牙医进行的根管治疗的质量表示担忧;因此,本研究旨在调查罗马尼亚目前的根管治疗实践。材料和方法:本研究通过向随机抽取的 400 名罗马尼亚牙医发放调查问卷的方式进行了横向研究,共收到 285 份完全有效的完整回复(回复率为 71.25%)。受访者按专业分组,采用交叉表和 χ2(卡方)检验等统计分析方法,所有检验的显著性水平均为 p≤ 0.05。结果在使用放大镜、橡胶坝、次氯酸钠浓度和生物陶瓷方面存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。在测量工作长度(p = 0.166)或旋转仪器运动(p = 0.289)的偏好方面没有发现明显差异。约有 6% 的受访者使用激光技术,不同专业之间无明显差异(p = 0.571)。此外,77.9%的受访者倾向于使用次氯酸钠,不同组别在浓度方面无明显差异(p = 0.006)。结论:包括 GDPs 在内的大多数参与者都在 RCT 期间使用现代设备和技术,这表明他们对当前牙髓治疗实践的认识和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信