Thulium laser transurethral incision of the prostate with ejaculation-sparing intent: 2-year follow-up outcomes from a high-volume centre.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-07 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2023.266
Marco Carilli, Riccardo Bertolo, Matteo Vittori, Valerio Iacovelli, Michele Antonucci, Francesco Maiorino, Marta Signoretti, Filomena Petta, Pierluigi Bove
{"title":"Thulium laser transurethral incision of the prostate with ejaculation-sparing intent: 2-year follow-up outcomes from a high-volume centre.","authors":"Marco Carilli, Riccardo Bertolo, Matteo Vittori, Valerio Iacovelli, Michele Antonucci, Francesco Maiorino, Marta Signoretti, Filomena Petta, Pierluigi Bove","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several 'ultra-minimally-invasive' surgical treatments (uMISTs) have been developed, aiming to relieve benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and spare ejaculatory function; however, such techniques do not always ensure substantial improvements in uroflowmetry parameters. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the 2-year functional outcomes of thulium laser transurethral incision of the prostate (ThuIP) as an alternative to uMISTs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of consecutive patients affected by BPO with indication to surgical intervention and a strong will to spare ejaculatory function were collected on a dedicated prospectively maintained database. A specific \"trifecta\" was identified as the contemporary presence of: (1) post-operative Qmax ≥15 ml/s; (2) absence of early (within 90 days) complications; and (3) preserved antegrade ejaculation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>120 patients underwent ThuIP and were analysed. Median catheterisation time was 2 days (IQR 2-2). Significant improvements in IPSS and IPSS-QoL scores and uroflowmetry parameters were observed at all follow-up times. At the last follow-up visit (24 months) the median ΔIPSS was -12 (-17; -9), median ΔIPSS-QoL was -3 (-4; -2), median ΔQmax was +7.7 ml/s (+5.2; +11.0), and median ΔPVR was -50 ml (-100; 0) (all p-values <0.001). Fourteen patients reported postoperative absence of antegrade ejaculation (11.7%). Overall, trifecta was achieved in 86 patients (71.7%) at 6 months, in 79 patients (65.8%) at 12 months, and in 75 patients (62.5%) at 24 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ThuIP allows for a significant improvement in uroflowmetry parameters and patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up. Moreover, antegrade ejaculation is preserved in approximately 90% of cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"235-242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Several 'ultra-minimally-invasive' surgical treatments (uMISTs) have been developed, aiming to relieve benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and spare ejaculatory function; however, such techniques do not always ensure substantial improvements in uroflowmetry parameters. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the 2-year functional outcomes of thulium laser transurethral incision of the prostate (ThuIP) as an alternative to uMISTs.

Material and methods: Data of consecutive patients affected by BPO with indication to surgical intervention and a strong will to spare ejaculatory function were collected on a dedicated prospectively maintained database. A specific "trifecta" was identified as the contemporary presence of: (1) post-operative Qmax ≥15 ml/s; (2) absence of early (within 90 days) complications; and (3) preserved antegrade ejaculation.

Results: 120 patients underwent ThuIP and were analysed. Median catheterisation time was 2 days (IQR 2-2). Significant improvements in IPSS and IPSS-QoL scores and uroflowmetry parameters were observed at all follow-up times. At the last follow-up visit (24 months) the median ΔIPSS was -12 (-17; -9), median ΔIPSS-QoL was -3 (-4; -2), median ΔQmax was +7.7 ml/s (+5.2; +11.0), and median ΔPVR was -50 ml (-100; 0) (all p-values <0.001). Fourteen patients reported postoperative absence of antegrade ejaculation (11.7%). Overall, trifecta was achieved in 86 patients (71.7%) at 6 months, in 79 patients (65.8%) at 12 months, and in 75 patients (62.5%) at 24 months.

Conclusions: ThuIP allows for a significant improvement in uroflowmetry parameters and patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up. Moreover, antegrade ejaculation is preserved in approximately 90% of cases.

保留射精功能的铥激光经尿道前列腺切开术:一家高流量中心的两年随访结果。
导言:目前已开发出多种 "超微创 "手术疗法(uMISTs),旨在缓解良性前列腺梗阻(BPO)并恢复射精功能;然而,这些技术并不总能确保尿流参数得到实质性改善。本研究旨在评估铥激光经尿道前列腺切开术(ThuIP)作为尿道前列腺电切术(uMISTs)替代方案的两年功能效果:在一个专门的前瞻性数据库中收集了受前列腺增生症(BPO)影响的连续患者的数据,这些患者均有手术干预指征,并有保留射精功能的强烈意愿。特定的 "三连胜 "被认定为同时具备以下条件:(1)术后Qmax≥15毫升/秒;(2)无早期(90天内)并发症;(3)保留逆行射精:对 120 名患者进行了 ThuIP 分析。导管插入时间中位数为 2 天(IQR 2-2)。在所有随访时间内,IPSS、IPSS-QoL 评分和尿流参数均有显著改善。在最后一次随访(24 个月)时,中位数 ΔIPSS 为 -12 (-17; -9),中位数 ΔIPSS-QoL 为 -3 (-4; -2),中位数 ΔQmax 为 +7.7 ml/s (+5.2; +11.0),中位数 ΔPVR 为 -50 ml (-100; 0)(所有 p 值均为结论):ThuIP 可显著改善尿流参数,并在 2 年随访时改善患者报告的结果。此外,约 90% 的病例保留了逆行射精功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信