Comparison of the European Foot and Ankle Score (EFAS) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot and ankle surgery.

IF 2 3区医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05585-y

Victoria Julia Frank, Philip Lichte, Natalia Gutteck, Bertil Bouillon, Dariusch Arbab

{"title":"Comparison of the European Foot and Ankle Score (EFAS) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot and ankle surgery.","authors":"Victoria Julia Frank, Philip Lichte, Natalia Gutteck, Bertil Bouillon, Dariusch Arbab","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05585-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The European Foot and Ankle Score EFAS and the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score SEFAS are two Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used in foot and ankle surgery. The EFAS has been published in recent years, while the SEFAS is a validated questionnaire based on the New Zealand total ankle questionnaire.Methods: We compared the EFAS to the SEFAS, Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) regarding reliability and validity based on the results of 126 patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery in a single center.Results: Both the EFAS and SEFAS demonstrate good psychometric properties with comparable reliability and validity. The EFAS questionnaire portrays pain and physical function as well as those well-established tools of SEFAS, NRS and SF-36.Conclusions: In conclusion both the EFAS and SEFAS show good psychometric properties with comparable results for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change and strong correlation for the corresponding domains describing pain and physical function.Levels of evidence: III.","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"4929-4935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05585-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The European Foot and Ankle Score EFAS and the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score SEFAS are two Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used in foot and ankle surgery. The EFAS has been published in recent years, while the SEFAS is a validated questionnaire based on the New Zealand total ankle questionnaire.

Methods: We compared the EFAS to the SEFAS, Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) regarding reliability and validity based on the results of 126 patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery in a single center.

Results: Both the EFAS and SEFAS demonstrate good psychometric properties with comparable reliability and validity. The EFAS questionnaire portrays pain and physical function as well as those well-established tools of SEFAS, NRS and SF-36.

Conclusions: In conclusion both the EFAS and SEFAS show good psychometric properties with comparable results for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change and strong correlation for the corresponding domains describing pain and physical function.

Levels of evidence: III.

查看原文本刊更多论文

比较足踝手术患者的欧洲足踝评分（EFAS）和自评足踝评分（SEFAS）。

背景：欧洲足踝评分（EFAS）和自我报告足踝评分（SEFAS）是足踝手术中使用的两种患者报告结果量表（PROM）。EFAS 是近几年发布的，而 SEFAS 则是基于新西兰全踝问卷的有效问卷：我们根据在一个中心接受足踝手术的 126 名患者的结果，比较了 EFAS 与 SEFAS、短表 36（SF-36）和数字评定量表（NRS）的信度和效度：结果：EFAS 和 SEFAS 都具有良好的心理测量特性，信度和效度相当。EFAS问卷对疼痛和身体功能的描述不亚于SEFAS、NRS和SF-36这些成熟的工具：结论：总之，EFAS 和 SEFAS 都显示出良好的心理测量特性，在内部一致性、重测可靠性、对变化的敏感性和描述疼痛和身体功能的相应领域的强相关性方面结果相当：证据等级：III.

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 医学-外科

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

13.00%

发文量

424

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).