Evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided maxillary and mandibular nerve pulsed radiofrequency treatment for trigeminal neuralgia and factors associated with successful response: a retrospective study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ezgi Can, Gevher Rabia Genç Perdecioğlu, Gökhan Yıldız, Damla Yürük, Ömer Taylan Akkaya
{"title":"Evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided maxillary and mandibular nerve pulsed radiofrequency treatment for trigeminal neuralgia and factors associated with successful response: a retrospective study.","authors":"Ezgi Can, Gevher Rabia Genç Perdecioğlu, Gökhan Yıldız, Damla Yürük, Ömer Taylan Akkaya","doi":"10.1007/s13760-024-02638-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the treatment efficacy and clinical and demographic characteristics affecting treatment success in patients who underwent ultrasound (US)-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) to the maxillary and/or mandibular nerves for trigeminal neuralgia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of patients with trigeminal neuralgia who underwent US-guided maxillary and/or mandibular nerve PRF between September 2022 and December 2023 were reviewed and the study was retrospectively designed. Good analgesia was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in pain score at 3 months after the procedure, and the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 72 included patients, 39 (54.2%) and 33 (45.8%) were classified as responders and non-responders, respectively. The age, pre- and post-procedural Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores, pain duration, and presence of constant pain were significantly lower in the responders. Logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (OR = 0.899, p < 0.001), high pre-procedural NRS scores (OR = 0.177, p = 0.009) and non-idiopathic (secondary or classic) etiology (OR = 0.062, p = 0.048) were significantly associated with an unsuccessful response to maxillary/mandibular PRF treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of PRF therapy of the maxillary and mandibular nerves in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia and demonstrated a significant reduction in pain scores at 3 months. Older age, high pre-procedural NRS scores, and non-idiopathic (secondary or classical) etiology are independent predictors of poor response to ultrasound-guided maxillary/mandibular nerve pulse radiofrequency treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-024-02638-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the treatment efficacy and clinical and demographic characteristics affecting treatment success in patients who underwent ultrasound (US)-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) to the maxillary and/or mandibular nerves for trigeminal neuralgia.

Methods: The data of patients with trigeminal neuralgia who underwent US-guided maxillary and/or mandibular nerve PRF between September 2022 and December 2023 were reviewed and the study was retrospectively designed. Good analgesia was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in pain score at 3 months after the procedure, and the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were assessed.

Results: Among the 72 included patients, 39 (54.2%) and 33 (45.8%) were classified as responders and non-responders, respectively. The age, pre- and post-procedural Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores, pain duration, and presence of constant pain were significantly lower in the responders. Logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (OR = 0.899, p < 0.001), high pre-procedural NRS scores (OR = 0.177, p = 0.009) and non-idiopathic (secondary or classic) etiology (OR = 0.062, p = 0.048) were significantly associated with an unsuccessful response to maxillary/mandibular PRF treatment.

Conclusion: This study is the first clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of PRF therapy of the maxillary and mandibular nerves in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia and demonstrated a significant reduction in pain scores at 3 months. Older age, high pre-procedural NRS scores, and non-idiopathic (secondary or classical) etiology are independent predictors of poor response to ultrasound-guided maxillary/mandibular nerve pulse radiofrequency treatment.

超声引导下颌神经脉冲射频治疗三叉神经痛的疗效评估及成功应答的相关因素:一项回顾性研究。
研究背景本研究旨在探讨在超声(US)引导下对上颌和/或下颌神经进行脉冲射频(PRF)治疗三叉神经痛患者的疗效以及影响治疗成功率的临床和人口学特征:回顾 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 12 月期间接受 US 引导的上颌和/或下颌神经脉冲射频治疗的三叉神经痛患者的数据,并对研究进行回顾性设计。术后3个月疼痛评分降低≥50%即为镇痛良好,并对患者的人口统计学和临床特征进行了评估:在纳入的 72 例患者中,39 例(54.2%)和 33 例(45.8%)分别被归类为有反应者和无反应者。有反应者的年龄、术前和术后的数字评分量表(NRS)评分、疼痛持续时间和是否存在持续疼痛均明显较低。逻辑回归分析表明,年龄越大(OR = 0.899,p 结论:年龄越大,疼痛持续时间越长:该研究是首个评估上颌和下颌神经 PRF 治疗三叉神经痛疗效的临床试验,结果表明 3 个月后疼痛评分明显降低。年龄较大、术前 NRS 评分较高以及非特发性(继发性或典型性)病因是超声引导下上颌/下颌神经脉冲射频治疗反应不佳的独立预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Belgica
Acta neurologica Belgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor. Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies: Belgian Neurological Society Belgian Society for Neuroscience Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis Belgian Stroke Council Belgian Headache Society Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信