Pain outcomes of outside-the-cage robotic thoracic surgery: a prospective matched-cohort study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Arthur Streit, Lyndon C Walsh, Florent Stasiak, Nicolas Vautrin, Philippe Guerci, Joseph Seitlinger, Stéphane Renaud
{"title":"Pain outcomes of outside-the-cage robotic thoracic surgery: a prospective matched-cohort study.","authors":"Arthur Streit, Lyndon C Walsh, Florent Stasiak, Nicolas Vautrin, Philippe Guerci, Joseph Seitlinger, Stéphane Renaud","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02108-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Management of acute and chronic pain after thoracic surgery for pulmonary resection or thymectomy remains a challenge for both thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists. Advances in minimally invasive robotic procedures have made subcostal outside-the-cage (OTC) resections possible, but the procedure's pain benefits have not been previously measured. A single-center cohort was consented to undergo robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) with an OTC or transthoracic (TT) approach. On every post-operative day (POD), patients were asked to complete the visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, assigning a score of 0-10 with higher scores equaling higher pain intensity. Additionally, patients' opioid consumption was recorded and classified using morphine equivalent dose (MED). Descriptive statistics of demographics, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-squared tests were performed in a matched analysis. Altogether, 50 OTC patients and 50 TT patients were included. For each group, 1 pneumonectomy, 19 lobectomies, 10 segmentectomies, and 20 thymectomies were performed. Between groups, most were male (n = 54; p = 0.42) and there were no differences in American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (p = 0.51), or tobacco consumption (p = 0.45). Patients who received an OTC approach experienced significantly lower pain scores on POD-0 (p = 0.001), POD-1 (p < 0.001), and POD-2 (p < 0.001). POD-3 OTC VAS scores were not different from those of the TT group (p = 0.09). Similarly, MED was lower for the OTC group on POD-0 (p < 0.001), POD-1 (p = 0.03), and POD-3 (p = 0.03). The RATS-OTC approach results in a more rapid decrease in self-reported pain by the patient as well as significantly lower levels of MED.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02108-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management of acute and chronic pain after thoracic surgery for pulmonary resection or thymectomy remains a challenge for both thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists. Advances in minimally invasive robotic procedures have made subcostal outside-the-cage (OTC) resections possible, but the procedure's pain benefits have not been previously measured. A single-center cohort was consented to undergo robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) with an OTC or transthoracic (TT) approach. On every post-operative day (POD), patients were asked to complete the visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, assigning a score of 0-10 with higher scores equaling higher pain intensity. Additionally, patients' opioid consumption was recorded and classified using morphine equivalent dose (MED). Descriptive statistics of demographics, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-squared tests were performed in a matched analysis. Altogether, 50 OTC patients and 50 TT patients were included. For each group, 1 pneumonectomy, 19 lobectomies, 10 segmentectomies, and 20 thymectomies were performed. Between groups, most were male (n = 54; p = 0.42) and there were no differences in American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (p = 0.51), or tobacco consumption (p = 0.45). Patients who received an OTC approach experienced significantly lower pain scores on POD-0 (p = 0.001), POD-1 (p < 0.001), and POD-2 (p < 0.001). POD-3 OTC VAS scores were not different from those of the TT group (p = 0.09). Similarly, MED was lower for the OTC group on POD-0 (p < 0.001), POD-1 (p = 0.03), and POD-3 (p = 0.03). The RATS-OTC approach results in a more rapid decrease in self-reported pain by the patient as well as significantly lower levels of MED.

笼外机器人胸腔手术的疼痛预后:一项前瞻性配对队列研究。
对于胸外科医生和麻醉师来说,肺切除术或胸腺切除术后急性和慢性疼痛的处理仍然是一项挑战。微创机器人手术的进步使肋骨下笼外切除术(OTC)成为可能,但该手术的止痛效果此前尚未进行过测量。一个单中心队列同意接受机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS),采用 OTC 或经胸腔(TT)方法。术后每一天(POD),患者都要完成疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS),评分为 0-10 分,分数越高,疼痛强度越大。此外,还记录了患者的阿片类药物消耗量,并使用吗啡当量剂量(MED)对其进行分类。在配对分析中进行了人口统计学描述性统计、曼-惠特尼检验和卡方检验。共纳入了 50 名 OTC 患者和 50 名 TT 患者。每组均进行了 1 次肺切除术、19 次肺叶切除术、10 次肺段切除术和 20 次胸腺切除术。各组之间,男性居多(n = 54;p = 0.42),美国麻醉医师协会评分(p = 0.51)和烟草消费(p = 0.45)无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信