Preliminary Reliability and Validity of the Self-Determination Inventory: Student Report French Translation.

IF 1.7 3区医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1352/1934-9556-62.5.339

Karrie A Shogren, Daria Gerasimova, Yves Lachapelle, Dany Lussier-Desrochers, Mayumi Hagiwara, Geneviève Petitpierre, Barbara Fontana-Lana, Filippo Piazza, Yannick Courbois, Agnès Desbiens, Marie-Claire Haelewyck, Hélène Geurts, Jesse R Pace, Tyler Hicks

{"title":"Preliminary Reliability and Validity of the Self-Determination Inventory: Student Report French Translation.","authors":"Karrie A Shogren, Daria Gerasimova, Yves Lachapelle, Dany Lussier-Desrochers, Mayumi Hagiwara, Geneviève Petitpierre, Barbara Fontana-Lana, Filippo Piazza, Yannick Courbois, Agnès Desbiens, Marie-Claire Haelewyck, Hélène Geurts, Jesse R Pace, Tyler Hicks","doi":"10.1352/1934-9556-62.5.339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a strong and growing focus on self-determination in French-speaking countries, and this pilot study reports the technical adequacy of the Self-Determination Inventory: Student Report (SDI:SR) French Translation. Data were collected with 471 French-speaking youth with and without disabilities in Canada (Quebec), Switzerland, France, and Belgium. Key findings showed it was feasible to use 20 (of 21) items to represent the self-determination construct in the French-speaking sample. The same set of items function in the same way across students with and without disabilities, and students with disabilities descriptively scored lower. Overall, this study provides promising evidence for reliability and validity of the SDI:SR French Translation and suggests ongoing development and larger-scale testing of the SDI:SR French Translation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":47489,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","volume":"62 5","pages":"339-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-62.5.339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a strong and growing focus on self-determination in French-speaking countries, and this pilot study reports the technical adequacy of the Self-Determination Inventory: Student Report (SDI:SR) French Translation. Data were collected with 471 French-speaking youth with and without disabilities in Canada (Quebec), Switzerland, France, and Belgium. Key findings showed it was feasible to use 20 (of 21) items to represent the self-determination construct in the French-speaking sample. The same set of items function in the same way across students with and without disabilities, and students with disabilities descriptively scored lower. Overall, this study provides promising evidence for reliability and validity of the SDI:SR French Translation and suggests ongoing development and larger-scale testing of the SDI:SR French Translation is warranted.

查看原文本刊更多论文

自我决定量表的初步可靠性和有效性：学生报告法文译本。

在法语国家，人们对自决的关注日益强烈，这项试点研究报告了自决量表在技术上的充分性：本试验性研究报告了 "自决量表：学生报告"（SDI:SR）法文译本的技术充分性。研究收集了加拿大（魁北克）、瑞士、法国和比利时 471 名讲法语的残疾和非残疾青少年的数据。主要研究结果表明，在法语样本中使用 20 个项目（共 21 个）来代表自决建构是可行的。同一组项目在残疾和非残疾学生中的作用相同，而残疾学生的描述性得分较低。总之，本研究为 SDI:SR 法文译本的可靠性和有效性提供了有希望的证据，并表明有必要对 SDI:SR 法文译本进行持续开发和更大规模的测试。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Multiple-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is dedicated to meeting the information needs of those who seek effective ways to help people with mental retardation. The journal reports new teaching approaches, program developments, administrative tools, program evaluation, service utilization studies, community surveys, public policy issues, training and case studies, and current research in mental retardation. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is a peer-reviewed journal whose consulting editors represent a broad spectrum of settings: universities, research centers, public and private residential care facilities, and specialized community service agencies.